Binging hours of chess content.
Twitter is a hate loudspeaker.
I hate UPSC IAS exam & coaching/propaganda centres both wasting youngster’s precious years.
Hell yes!
Ambitious students becoming bureaucrats & clerks!
What could go wrong? In just few years, govt perks like car, bungalows lose their shine. Public fame and respect also ring hollow. All dreams of making change in society gets crushed by red tape and transfers.
this government’s priorities are genuinely fucking disgusting. just two weeks ago, hundreds of lady shri ram college students were on the streets protesting for basic rights, demanding functional CCTV cameras, better lighting, pink booths, security especially around gate 7 & the back gate. women were on the streets demanding basic safety and the government headed by rekha gupta couldn’t show the same urgency.
but just a day before the Jantar Mantar protest on 10th october, suddenly there’s an order to install 1,000+ cameras around the protest site. THOUSANDS. yeah they successfully installed more than thousand cameras in just 2 days. apparently, the government knows how to mobilise resources overnight when it comes to keeping an eye on citizens who raise their voices, but becomes deaf, dumb and paralysed when young women from one of the finest institution of this country demands protection in the nation’s capital.
they have the machinery to watch you, the manpower to stop you and the resources to control & suppress you. what they apparently lack is the urgency to protect you.
the most fucking shameful part? delhi has a woman chief minister, yet women’s safety seems to be the last thing on this government’s priority list. when women demand protection, the system goes silent. when citizens prepare to protest, suddenly the cameras, barricades and police are ready. if a woman becoming chief minister doesn’t make women’s safety a priority in nation’s capital, then what the fuck was the point of having one? and some of you spineless clowns still have the fucking audacity to defend this government & their spineless actions?!!
Suddenly, the government has drones, facial scanning, high-tech surveillance and an extremely heavy police presence to suppress protesters But where is all this when it comes to women's safety??
Hello India.
We are under a State of Emergency.
The Government of India is at war with its own young citizens.
But remember, the young generation will prevail.
See you all in Delhi 10th October onwards. Jeetenge! ✊🏻🇮🇳🪳
@Cockroachisback
Due to the foreign companies we made our life better, have money, house, car, can retire, lived with dignity, go on vacation, have peace of mind, worked with respect.
Otherwise these babus, lala companies & politicians would have treated like slaves, delivery boy, waiter jobs.
If they don't allow the protest on October 10. we will protest on:
▪️ October 11
▪️ October 12
▪️ October 13
▪️ October 14
▪️ October 15
▪️ October 16
▪️ .
▪️ .
▪️ .
▪️ VERY SINGLE DAY UNTIL GYANESH CHOR AND TRAITOR, RESIGNS!
How long will Modi-Shah shut down Delhi to protect these chors? You can block roads, shut metro stations and detain protesters, but you cannot silence people forever. THE FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY WILL CONTINUE!
Statement: MeitY’s “enhanced diligence” advisory pressures platforms to police protest speech. It must be withdrawn.
October 9, 2026
On October 8, MeitY’s Cyber Laws Division sent an advisory to all social media intermediaries. It asks them to exercise “enhanced diligence” over false, misleading, manipulated or out-of-context content linked to “ongoing public events and developments”, to “identify, prevent and not promote” unlawful information, to label or “contextualise” misleading content, and to prioritise complaints from “authorised Government agencies” on public-order content. It takes effect immediately. MeitY has not published it and its text became public through MediaNama. It was issued as citizens protest in Delhi and Mumbai over the revision of electoral rolls, with a protest called at Jantar Mantar for October 10. We call on MEITY to withdraw it.
First, the advisory names no provision that empowers MeitY to issue it and such advisories are not issued under any law. Section 79(2)(c) of the IT Act conditions safe harbour on “due diligence” and on guidelines the Central Government may “prescribe”, that is, by rules notified and laid before Parliament under Section 87. The IT Rules recognise only “due diligence” under Rule 3 and “additional due diligence” for significant social media intermediaries under Rule 4. The phrase, “Enhanced diligence” used in this Advisory appears in neither. Further, MeitY’s proposed Rule 3(4) in the last round of Amendments mooted to the IT Rules, 2021, which has not been notified further confirms this does not have any legal character. Second, an advisory cannot alter the application of existing law. Rule 3(1)(b)(v) covers only misinformation communicated “knowingly and intentionally” that is “patently false and untrue or misleading in nature”. The advisory drops both qualifiers and adds “social tranquility”, neither that nor “misleading” is a ground for restricting speech under Article 19(2).
Third, facing an undefined standard platforms will censor more than the law requires. The advisory asks them to “identify, prevent and not promote” unlawful information and to “strengthen their existing monitoring”. This is proactive monitoring by another name, which the Rules contemplate only for narrow categories such as child sexual abuse material. Further, it is vague and does does not define “authorised Government agencies” or “priority”, and does not require platforms to tell users that a government complaint lay behind an action. Users will see only a platform decision. The State’s role disappears, and with it any route to challenge that role in court. The advisory governs public speech but is not itself public. It cites no statutory provision, is approved by an unnamed “competent authority”, and does not identify the events or content that prompted it.
We anticipate a huge spike in censorship over the next few days.
We call on MeitY to:
1. Publish the advisory in full, including any clause (v), and state the provision under which it was issued.
2. Withdraw it, or clarify that it creates no obligations beyond the IT Act and Rules and that “enhanced diligence” is not a condition of safe harbour.
3. Disclose which agencies are sending complaints under it, and how many.
4. Abandon the proposed Rule 3(4).
We also call on platforms to:
1. Disclose all government complaints and requests received under this advisory.
2. Act only on requests that meet the Shreya Singhal standard and Rule 3(1)(d).
3. Refrain from proactively filtering or downranking protest content on the basis of this advisory.
4. Notify affected users, including when an action follows a government complaint.
PS: We got the text of the advisory from @medianama' s website.
NYU math professor Tristan Buckmaster says OpenAI’s Tuesday drop of 722 AI-generated math papers wiped out entire research programs:
“This recent dump of papers on Tuesday destroyed the careers of early career mathematicians.”