chiefboldeagle

Facts over feelings. Results matter.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@Fadzailolo @DandaroOnline Chingoti gaga Tv Sales yaka baiwa!

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@ChampionsLeague Why Always Him?

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@DandaroOnline cross-examine the staff.

What are the actual working conditions?

The evidence points to a broader narrative that demands rigorous investigation. A theft of this magnitude defies rational self-interest we must determine whether this is an isolated breach or a systemic defect, and precisely what structural incentives drive employees to such unlawful recourse.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@FCBarcelona Win what exactly?

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@advocatemahere

Commissioner Nyathi, on 17 October you told Zimbabweans that the system automatically detects violations and sends notifications. On 20 October he explained that 4.8 million flagged incidents require validation to establish whether offences occurred.

Does the system automatically detect proven violations, or does it merely generate suspicions requiring human verification?

And at what stage are motorists notified?

The State cannot demand precision from motorists while being imprecise about its own enforcement machinery.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@FCBarcelona Who asked you?

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@SawyerMerritt @BYDCompany are done during day light which removes any conspiracy theories. It will be wonderful to see @Tesla do the same and remove all doubt.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@Gaurab To settle the debate on this let them do another one during day time @Tesla , what does have to lose?

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@CounselBaptiste @LarryMadowo @PaulKagame 😂😂 I like that perspective! Perhaps that's the secret seeing possibilities where others see disappointment.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@Vadyegoraa Discard raw passions and personal drama. The proper recourse lies not in lawless violence!

Seek redress where it hurts most: the PURSE.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@Opulent_Shingie

The court is treated here to a display of digital armchair accounting so breathtakingly misguided that it demands a swift arithmetic correction.

​Our commentator giggling uncontrollably into his keyboard asks with mocking incredulity what the Plaintiff will tell his friends when he collects his $200,000 judgment: "Ndaane mari yei?" ("What money do I now have?") Is it proceeds from selling his spouse ("Yekutengesa mukadzi?")? Is it "seed capital" ("mari ye start") for his next chapter, or an absurd "push present"? He concludes, with supreme self-confidence, that the Plaintiff is a "loser".

​Let us indulge this commenter’s financial premise and run the actual numbers, shall we?

​Suppose, hypothetically, the Plaintiff paid a customary lobola or dowry of $20,000. If our self-appointed forensic accountant insists on treating a sacred marital union as an amortizable corporate asset, we must apply standard straight-line accounting rules over the 9-year duration of the marriage.

​At a standard 2% annual depreciation rate, the math proceeds as follows:

Hypothetical Initial Dowry: $20,000
9 Years Depreciation (2%/yr): ($3,600 [$400 x 9 years)
------------------------------------------------------
Net Book Value of "Asset": $16,400

Court Judgment Demanded: $200,000
-Adjusted Net Book Value: ($16,400)
------------------------------------------------------
Realized Financial Return: $183,600 (Over 1,100% Return on Investment)

By the commentator’s own flawed logic, the Plaintiff did not merely break even he realised a $183,600 net financial gain, representing a staggering 1,119% return on his initial $20,000 layout!

Even the most seasoned CA at a top-tier firm like @GrantThornton would struggle to yield an eleven-fold return on an asset after nine years of straight-line depreciation. So if we are measuring this by cold, ruthless commercial arithmetic, who exactly is the loser here?

​Certainly not the husband who leveraged a $16,400 depreciated "book value" into a $200,000 court judgment!

​Of course, this entire mathematical exercise serves only to highlight the commentator's utter illiteracy in basic tort law.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@NewsHawksLive Do you have the Google coordinates? Anyone?

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@BitiTendai Hon is it him alone?

We also have white based entities who are also doing this through proxies but in stealth mode.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

The common law of adultery does not exist to flatter the tender feelings of modern libertines, nor does it serve as a mere fossil in our jurisprudence. It exists to protect an ancient, foundational institution: marriage. When a third party willfully inserts himself into the marital sanctuary, dismantles its peace, and plunders its fidelity, he commits a tort of the highest order.

To make matters worse, the Defendant a senior corporate practitioner who ought to understand the sanctity of contracts better than most chose to parade his conquest with unseemly arrogance.

The law must possess teeth, or it ceases to be law. A judgment of US$200,000 split between the humiliation suffered ($100,000) and the loss of marital companionship ($100,000) is neither excessive nor punitive. It is a necessary, principled accounting for the deliberate wrecking of a union.

@GrantThorntonUK @GrantThorntonUS @GrantThornton @GrantThorntonPL

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@LynneStactia GET - RUDE

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@IanECox @jahman_adamski

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@WillarShoko Is that the same thing customers have with aura they overpay subs and they are not in control of their kit.

They cant even change passwords.

[chiefboldeagle @ChiefZW1]

@jahman_adamski Read today's Bloomberg Balance of Power by @MarksSimon.

I think 🤔 you maybe onto something!