Ça fait un moment que je me pose des questions sur le bilan (provisoire) de Milei en Argentine. On lit tout et son contraire. Alors j'ai arrêté de lire les commentaires et j'ai regardé les chiffres bruts.
L'Argentine, c'est l'expérience grandeur nature que les économistes attendaient depuis 50 ans. Même pays. Même peuple. Même culture. On change UNE variable : la méthode économique.
Avant : des décennies de gestion étatiste et péroniste, "redistributive". Le résultat concret ? 211% d'inflation, 42% de pauvreté, un État en déficit permanent qui finance son train de vie en faisant tourner la planche à billets.
Puis arrive Milei. Méthode inverse, brutale, assumée : on coupe, on déréglemente, on arrête d'imprimer.
Deux ans plus tard (photo à son arrivée (fin 2023) vs aujourd'hui) :
Inflation annuelle : 211% → 31%
Inflation mensuelle : 25% → ~2%
Déficit public : −5% du PIB → +1,8% (excédent)
Croissance : −1,6% → +4,4%
Pauvreté : 42% → 28%
Sans débat. Jugez par vous-mêmes.
Et le point essentiel : ces gains ne vont pas "aux riches" ou "aux marchés". Ils vont d'abord aux plus pauvres.
L'inflation est l'impôt le plus injuste qui existe — elle frappe ceux qui n'ont aucun actif pour se protéger. La diviser par 7, c'est rendre du pouvoir d'achat à ceux d'en bas. Et 14 points de pauvreté en moins, ce sont des millions de gens, pas une ligne Excel.
Pendant un siècle, on a expliqué aux Argentins que l'État les protégerait en dépensant toujours plus. Résultat : un des pays les plus riches du monde en 1910, ruiné. On vient d'inverser la méthode. Regardez le résultat.
À un moment, il faut accepter ce que les faits racontent : sur le terrain économique, la méthode libérale a livré en deux ans ce que des décennies de socialisme avaient promis sans jamais tenir. Et ça profite d'abord aux plus modestes.
On peut détester le style de Milei — la tronçonneuse, l'outrance, les sorties improbables, il n'a rien d'un homme d'État classique. Mais on ne juge pas une politique économique au style de celui qui la mène. On la juge à ce qu'elle fait à la vie des gens.
Et les chiffres ont parlé.
Classic 1980s debate moment.
A woman in hijab passionately challenges Rabbi Meir Kahane: “How can you have no compassion for the Arab people?” invoking Hitler and Palestinian suffering.
Kahane’s calm, piercing response cuts through:
“You had an opportunity for your own state in 1948. The UN proposed partition plan which would have created a Palestine and an Israel. You went to war. You killed 6,000 of our people. ’56, another war. ’67, another war. ’73, another war. I don’t trust you. I don’t believe you. When I’m attacked and I win and you lose, and you’re the one that started it, learn one thing… you take the consequences of your actions.”
Raw, unfiltered truth about repeated rejection of peace and the cost of starting wars.
No slogans. Just history.
Powerful then. Powerful now.
Rare footage from a kindergarten graduation party in Gaza in 2016.
Palestinian children in Gaza are taught to be terrorists.
They have been planning October 7 for decades, brainwashing their children to join Hamas.
Share this. Make it go viral. The world must see this.
Terwijl de "Palestijnen" blijven beweren dat de Joden hen in 1948 uit Palestina hebben verdreven, bewijst dit document precies het tegenovergestelde.
De Joden vroegen de Arabieren NIET te vertrekken, maar de Arabische leiders stonden erop de Arabische bevolking uit Palestina te evacueren.
Waarom?
Omdat de omliggende Arabische staten van plan waren de nieuwe staat Israël aan te vallen, te vernietigen en vervolgens de vertrokken Arabieren terug te sturen.
Lees dit document, geschreven door de Britse districtscommissaris Haifa Dant van Beline Linifa, in april 1948 aandachtig door:
"De Joden hebben de Arabieren opgeroepen hun winkels en bedrijven te heropenen om de problemen met het voeden van de Arabische bevolking te verlichten.
De evacuatie was gisteren nog steeds aan de gang en er werden verschillende tochten per 'Z'-vaartuig naar Akko gemaakt.
Ook de wegen stonden vol met mensen die Haifa met al hun bezittingen verlieten.
Tijdens een bijeenkomst gisterenmiddag herhaalden Arabische leiders hun vastberadenheid om de gehele Arabische bevolking te evacueren. Om de evacuatie te ondersteunen, hebben ze vanochtend tien militaire vrachtwagens van 3 ton geleend.
Foto: Carl Hermann Voss, The Palestine Problem Today (Boston, 1953)
De enige "Nakba" (ramp) van de "Palestijnen" is dat de Arabieren er niet in geslaagd zijn Israël te vernietigen.
(De Stem van de Waarheid op X)
Elon Musk just defended America better than every politician in Washington combined.
Musk: “After World War 2, the US could have basically taken over the world and any country. Like we got nukes, nobody else got nukes. We don’t even have to lose soldiers. Which country do you want?”
One nation on earth held a weapon nobody else had.
Total dominance. Zero competition. No risk of retaliation.
Every empire in history that held that kind of advantage used it.
Rome. The Mongols. The British. The Ottomans.
They conquered until they collapsed.
America had a bigger advantage than all of them combined.
And it rebuilt the countries it just defeated.
Musk: “The United States actually helped rebuild countries. So it helped rebuild Europe, it helped rebuild Japan. This is very unusual behavior, almost unprecedented.”
Almost unprecedented?
It had never happened before. Not once in 5,000 years of recorded history.
The Marshall Plan wasn’t foreign aid.
It was the most radical act of restraint any superpower ever committed.
America turned its enemies into allies. Turned rubble into economies. Turned surrender into partnership.
Germany went from ashes to the economic engine of Europe in a generation.
Japan went from unconditional surrender to the third largest economy on earth.
Three years after the war, America was flying food into Berlin.
A city in the heart of the nation that just tried to destroy it.
That’s not policy.
That’s a civilization deciding what it is at the exact moment it has the power to be anything.
You’re being told a story right now.
That America is the villain of history.
You hear it everywhere. Media. Universities. Social platforms.
Musk: “There’s always like, well America’s done bad things. Well of course America’s done bad things, but one needs to look at the whole track record.”
Every nation on earth has dark chapters. Every single one.
The difference is what a country does when nobody can stop it.
And when nobody could stop America, it fed its enemies and rebuilt their cities.
Musk: “The history of China suggests that China is not acquisitive. Meaning they’re not going to go out and invade a whole bunch of countries.”
Probably right.
China has historically built walls, not fleets.
But the real question isn’t about borders anymore.
We’re approaching a moment that mirrors 1945 in ways nobody has fully processed yet.
AI is going to give a handful of people a power advantage that makes nuclear monopoly look quaint.
If someone is going to hold that kind of power, who do you want it to be?
The country that conquered when it could? Or the one that rebuilt when it didn’t have to?
Every alliance. Every trade route. Every economy.
Billions lifted out of poverty.
All of it traces back to one act of restraint that had never been done before.
And carries no guarantee of being repeated.
The most powerful thing America ever did wasn’t building the bomb.
It was what it didn’t do after.
Two passengers ‘exposed to hantavirus’ have arrived in Atlanta and are being monitored at Emory University Hospital in DeKalb County.
Seems a bit extreme this response?! 🤣
But some of those present weren’t wearing PPE because they didn’t know they were being filmed lol
🚨🇫🇷 RIESIGE Verschiebung in Frankreich
Französische Medien fordern jetzt offen, Ursulas EU zu VERLASSEN!
Beenden der Sanktionen gehen Russland. Bringt die Atomkraft zurück. Keine Windkraftanlagen.
Anti Brüssel wird MAINSTREAM 💪🔥