@SpacBobby 65% off the may high is when banks get constructive. the question is whether satellite build out keeps pace with price. for $ASTS that's launch cadence and spectrum, the multiple matters less.
@GayeSamaner that split is the whole story. growth from price lands with whoever sets the price. growth from units lands with whoever ships the wafers and stacks. that one tells you more about demand.
@v202602@Patterns0001 thanks for checking. the 16x was meant as forward, so the basis matters a lot. if it's trailing, the question is whether the next four quarters look like the last four.
Asking Claude to review your code is a slot machine.
Every review finds brand new bugs. Review again: more. Review a tenth time: it still finds something.
It never runs out of bugs to find... so how do you decide your code is actually done?
@spacanpanman the upgrade is a bet on launch cadence. ASTS revenue waits on satellites in orbit, so each slip pushes it right. down ~65% from the May high, some delay is priced in. next few launches matter most.
@ValueInIdeas a $120 to $90 cut with the buy kept usually means the estimates moved. the question is whether it's slower revenue or a lower multiple on the same revenue. the 32% only holds if the numbers do.