@sterillo_ If you really care about the process and not about the end result then this is nothing to you because it affects in 0 ways your ability to decompose games to understand how they work. You can even decompose games already decomposed. But no, you a bitch.
@staysaasy I was with you until you mentioned Bohemian Rhapsody and Master of Puppets as majestic. I thought you were going to mention true grandiosity and genius like Bach. Directionally correct. Proportionally wrong.
@siziyman@EmptyJarDoto@Fenruscloud 1. No you don't. Folks cannot stall on your clock, they waste their clock while stalling which is the point. No need for judge calls.
It's quite clear you don't understand how chess clocks work. I don't know how to explain them any simpler and I don't suffer fools. I'm out.
@siziyman@EmptyJarDoto@Fenruscloud 1. You're already playing that game today with stallers, except there's no objective way to prove they are doing this every time they get priority.
2. You get time added back to your clock everytime you touch it.
@siziyman@EmptyJarDoto@Fenruscloud I already explained it to you. You don't touch the clock unless the opponent tries to do something.
Player A: I attack... responses?
Player B: No
(You don't touch the clock and continue)
Player A: I attack... responses?
Player B: Yes
(You touch the clock)