THE TRUTH IS NOW SEEPING OUT OF WHAT HAPPENDED AT THE WUHAN INSTITUTE OF VIROLOGY IN CHINA.
Who was complicit in Federal Government of funding this FRANKENSTEIN Gain-of-Function "research"creation from SARS-COV-1 to SARS-COV-2?
https://t.co/pm3dPAX475
https://t.co/O8xXyNQCbA
Since we know the British government wants to make sure women are safe both online and offline (thus contemplating a Russia-style @X ban, to protect them from bikini images), here’s more from Wikipedia on cousin marriage — and its connection to honor killing.
I’ve received some questions about what we mean, in our National Security Strategy, when we invoke “civilizational” concerns. So I’m tweeting a relevant news item.
Permitting incestuous marriages which will lead to birth defects and developmental disabilities that will in turn place even more strain on the NHS and cause untold misery to children so as to secure the Muslim vote is about as disgraceful as it gets.
https://t.co/60dFDDJNqz
Keir Starmer has been asked to ban:
The Muslim Brotherhood
Cousin Marriage
Medical experiments on Children
Halal Slaughter
He said no to all of them
Instead he wants to ban 𝕏
We all know why
🚨 "Mercantile interests put FRUIT LOOPS at the top of the food pyramid!"
RFK Jr. says the food pyramid was INTENTIONALLY DESIGNED by corporations to poison America's kids.
First they sell you the disease.
Then they sell you the cure.
The SCAM ENDS NOW.
Thank you @SecKennedy!
Calls to Remove COVID-19 Vaccines from Human Use for Years Have Been Ignored
Hulscher N, Bowden M T., McCullough P A. Review of Calls for Market Removal of COVID-19 Vaccines Intensify: Risks Far Outweigh Theoretical Benefits. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2025 Jan 28; v6.2019-2025 @SecKennedy@HHSGov@CDCgov@ShannonJoyRadio@shannonjoyradi0@mdbreathe@NicHulscher@McCulloughFund https://t.co/HEg49y19OB
🚨 WOAH! 🚨 Senator Ron Johnson just said COVID was “preplanned by an elite group of people."
“This needs to be exposed."
"Event 201. It occurred in late 2019, prior to the rest of us knowing about the pandemic."
Congress KNOWS.
So when will we get accountability??
Both lemongrass and dandelion root selectively destroy human cancer cells in vitro and suppress human tumor growth in mice by ~95% — with ZERO harm to healthy cells.
Common, non-toxic plants shown to nearly HALT tumor growth in animal models deserve immediate clinical trials.
These are the words of the first 16 scientists of 46 that have left the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) due to the corruption of science within the organisation.
Dr Robert Balling: The IPCC notes that “No significant acceleration in the rate of sea level rise during the 20th century has been detected.” This did not appear in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.
Dr Lucka Bogataj: “Rising levels of airborne carbon dioxide don’t cause global temperatures to rise…. temperature changed first and some 700 years later a change in aerial content of carbon dioxide followed.”
Dr John Christy: “Little known to the public is the fact that most of the scientists involved with the IPCC do not agree that global warming is occurring. Its findings have been consistently misrepresented and/or politicized with each succeeding report.”
Dr Rosa Compagnucci: “Humans have only contributed a few tenths of a degree to warming on Earth. Solar activity is a key driver of climate.”
Dr Richard Courtney: “The empirical evidence strongly indicates that the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis is wrong.”
Dr Judith Curry: “I’m not going to just spout off and endorse the IPCC because I don’t have confidence in the process.”
Dr Robert Davis: “Global temperatures have not been changing as state of the art climate models predicted they would. Not a single mention of satellite temperature observations appears in the IPCC Summary for Policymakers.”
Dr Willem de Lange: “In 1996 the IPCC listed me as one of approximately 3000 “scientists” who agreed that there was a discernible human influence on climate. I didn’t. There is no evidence to support the hypothesis that runaway catastrophic climate change is due to human activities.”
Dr Chris de Freitas: “Government decision-makers should have heard by now that the basis for the long-standing claim that carbon dioxide is a major driver of global climate is being questioned; along with it the hitherto assumed need for costly measures to restrict carbon dioxide emissions. If they have not heard, it is because of the din of global warming hysteria that relies on the logical fallacy of ‘argument from ignorance’ and predictions of computer models.”
Dr Oliver Frauenfeld: “Much more progress is necessary regarding our current understanding of climate and our abilities to model it.”
Dr Peter Dietze: “Using a flawed eddy diffusion model, the IPCC has grossly underestimated the future oceanic carbon dioxide uptake.”
Dr John Everett: “It is time for a reality check. The oceans and coastal zones have been far warmer and colder than is projected in the present scenarios of climate change. I have reviewed the IPCC and more recent scientific literature and believe that there is not a problem with increased acidification, even up to the unlikely levels in the most-used IPCC scenarios.”
Dr Eigil Friis-Christensen: “The IPCC refused to consider the sun’s effect on the Earth’s climate as a topic worthy of investigation. The IPCC conceived its task only as investigating potential human causes of climate change.”
Dr Lee Gerhard: “I never fully accepted or denied the anthropogenic global warming concept until the furore started after NASA’s James Hansen’s wild claims in the late 1980s. I went to the [scientific] literature to study the basis of the claim, starting with first principles. My studies then led me to believe that the claims were false.”
Dr Indur Goklany: “Climate change is unlikely to be the world’s most important environmental problem of the 21st century. There is no signal in the mortality data to indicate increases in the overall frequencies or severities of extreme weather events, despite large increases in the population at risk.”
Dr Vincent Gray: “The [IPCC] climate change statement is an orchestrated litany of lies.”
BOOM🚨Robert F. Kennedy Jr. just nuked the narrative.
“If you look at the Pfizer vaccine studies, the people who got the vaccine had a 23 percent HIGHER death rate from all causes.”
Bill Maher panics.
“But that could be the disease itself…”
Kennedy ends it.
“Then the vaccine doesn’t WORK, does it?”
That’s it. Game over.
If a vaccine doesn’t reduce overall deaths, it failed.
If deaths go UP, it’s not protection. It’s harm.
They censored doctors.
They buried data.
They bullied the public.
Now the truth is leaking out anyway.
There are now 13 studies comparing vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children. They ALL found the SAME thing — vaccinated children are FAR sicker, with higher risks of:
Death.
Autism.
Cancer.
Autoimmune diseases.
Diabetes.
ADHD.
Tics.
Asthma.
Motor disability.
Speech disorders.
Mental health disorders.
Neurodevelopmental disorders.
Developmental delays.
Atopic diseases.
Seizure disorders.
Food allergies.
Neurological disorders.
Brain dysfunction.
Behavioral disability.
Learning disability.
Intellectual disability.
Chronic infections.
Did you know the news used to regularly air stories about people's lives being ruined by vaccines?
That all changed after Clinton let Pharma buy out the media.
Here I compiled 56 mind-blowing news segments they'd never air today.
https://t.co/HI2GyO0M1R
Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong's stark warning on cancer treatment:
"Chemo & radiation wipe out your NK cells & T cells — the very immune cells that give long-term survival & memory."
He says the short-term tumor shrinkage is a "response," but it sets up metastasis.
If someone close to you got cancer, he'd start them on his immune program first — before chemo/radiation.
1:51 clip — provocative rethink on how we fight cancer
What do you make of prioritizing immune function over immediate tumor reduction?