Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man Will Be the Key to Stopping Doctor Doom
•Tobey Maguire’s Spider-Man plays a much bigger and more important role than just a cameo.
• Because he has already experienced multiverse travel and worked with different versions of himself in *No Way Home*, he will be the one who truly understands how to fight against Doctor Doom’s multiversal plans.
• Tobey’s Peter Parker will act as the bridge between the different universes (Earth-616, Fantastic Four universe, and X-Men universe). His experience will help the Avengers and other heroes coordinate and avoid making critical mistakes.
• The theory suggests that Doctor Doom will specifically target Tobey’s universe because it is one of the most “stable” realities, making it a major threat to Doom’s goal of conquering multiple timelines.
• Tobey’s Spider-Man may even make a major sacrifice or key decision in the final act that temporarily stops Doom, setting up the bigger conflict for Avengers: Secret Wars.
• This would also explain why Tobey has been heavily rumored his version of Spider-Man brings both experience and emotional weight that the newer Spider-Men don’t have yet.
.
The Iranian Playbook: How Iran Could Stage the Walk-Back of Trump's Deal
I remain highly skeptical that we will actually see a deal reached where Iran signs on the dotted line, without more military pressure. Personally, I just don't believe a lasting agreement is going to happen, at least not yet. We have all seen this exact movie play out before, and it usually ends with negotiations falling apart at the very last second.
If Iran walks away from a deal with Trump again, the market will realize it was fooled, causing a massive rubber-band effect on prices. Oil would surge and the stock market would tank.
The White House has made it clear that this is Iran's absolute last chance to sign the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). Vice President JD Vance is prepared to travel to Europe to sign the papers, but the U.S. military is simultaneously preparing for the alternative. If Iran tries to stall or fabricate an excuse to walk away, the region will almost certainly see a major escalation in heavy combat by next week.
If Iran backtracks from a deal, it will likely point to the public fight over the deal's terms. Iranian hardliners and politicians inside Tehran's Supreme National Security Council are already publicly fighting over the deal. This gives a clear reason why they are likely to walk it back—internal political survival. Leaders in Tehran will claim that Trump's insistence on "no upfront cash" and total nuclear dismantling violates what was originally agreed upon in secret.
A major hidden deal-breaker could be the fight over shipping costs. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said discussions involving "service fees" in the Strait of Hormuz remain part of ongoing negotiations, according to remarks carried by Iran's Tasnim news agency. If the U.S. refuses to let Iran charge these massive transit fees to international oil tankers, Tehran could easily use it as an excuse to completely torch the agreement.
The fact that the U.S. Navy just shot down multiple Iranian attack drones in the Strait of Hormuz highlights just how thin the ice is. It proves that "the alternative" military option isn't just a future threat—it is actively happening right now.
#Iranwar #oil #Trump $SPX $SPY $QQQ
An emotional moment as Cleveland #Guardians 24yr old RHP prospect Daniel Espino walks of the mound today for Triple-A Columbus.
Espino persevered through multiple surgeries and rehab going 1,241 days between starts as well as the passing of his father during that span.
#GuardsBall
@King0ftheCharts@wntubmyneighbor I think trump pumping the markets up because old trump would have destroy Iran alright, he worried about image or making money because he says there a new deal every week and maybe he waiting til midterm election 🤔
.
Once Again, There Isn't Going to be an Iran Deal!
Expect Trump's Iran Deal to Fall Apart
This deal will likely fall apart by this weekend or next week — and maybe by then, Trump will finally have had a enough of the games. While the experts and the crowd believe there will be a deal, the crowd is usually wrong. The crowd has priced a peace deal into the stock market that isn't going to happen. Not without more military force.
Iran is denying that a final peace agreement has been reached with the United States. Iran continues to flatly deny any imminent agreement with the Trump administration, rejecting U.S. claims of progress and insisting their red lines on enrichment and sanctions relief are non-negotiable.
If no breakthrough materializes, full-fledged combat operations could resume as early as this weekend or next week. Trump canceled the military strikes that were scheduled for Thursday. Once Iran walks back its commitments again and plays more games, Trump will have no choice but to go in and finish the job. That will likely cause oil prices to surge and the stock market to tumble.
This is a fast-moving situation—diplomatic posturing often masks escalation risks in the region.
#Iranwar #Trump $SPX $SPY $QQQ $NDX #SpaceX
🚨Breaking news: 🦋
@Nasdaq just LOST its Motion to Quash.
Read that again s l o w l y . . .
The Bankruptcy Court in Nevada has now ordered Nasdaq to produce extensive $MMAT/TRCH trading data under Rule 2004, including RASH and CORE data, order attributes, cancellations, replaces, executions, and related transaction records covering nearly FOUR YEARS.
The Court was NOT persuaded by the ‘undue burden’ argument, noting that producing ~15GB of spreadsheet data is not exactly impossible for… Nasdaq. (One $10 usb stick)
Even more important, the Court explicitly recognized the Trustee’s AUTHORITY to investigate whether wrongdoing occurred on behalf of the estate, including potential claims tied to stock trading activity.
Translation:
This investigation is very much ALIVE.
For months, some people mocked and undermined the Trustee’s efforts, claimed discovery would never happen, and acted like every subpoena didn’t get served initially and that it would be crushed before daylight. Instead, the wall keeps cracking.
FINRA discovery.
Now Nasdaq discovery.
And the Court explicitly referenced separate pending motions involving Citadel, Virtu, and Anson.
Interesting times ahead.
Turns out Rule 2004 is not just a decorative suggestion.
To the Trustee and legal teams, incredible respect.
It takes courage to walk into rooms filled with institutions that have virtually unlimited resources and say:
‘Produce the data’
And to the echo chambers already warming up their spin machines tonight…
You may want to read the actual order first. 🤝
Blessings to all.
Easy. STOCK SETTLEMENT IS NOT ENFORCED!
Naked shorting in the stock market is allowed to exist in immeasurable volumes because stock settlement is NOT enforced. In any other instance, you would clearly identify this practice as STEALING, THEFT, and FRAUD.
Abolish the Financial Regulatory Authority @FINRA, absorb their responsibilities in @SECGov, and hold the SEC accountable to the rules already in place.
Eliminate the Market Maker Exemption and mandate a pre-borrow locate for every short sale. Why should anyone be able to sell something they don’t own or worse…that doesn’t EXIST?!
$MMTLP @elonmusk@DOGE
Cleveland #Guardians are promoting 25-year-old RHP prospect Daniel Espino before the Tigers series starts on Friday. Espino will make his MLB debut working out of the bullpen.
#GuardsBall
MMAT MMTLP TRCH
🚨WHY DOESN’T THE TRUSTEE PURSUE A MOTION TO COMPEL?🤔
⚠️ Not legal advice - for discussion purposes.
A motion to compel usually works best when:
•The court knows exactly what is missing.
•The producing party (DTCC) has had a chance to explain why it hasn’t produced it.
•The judge understands any technical, confidentiality, or protective-order issues.
•The moving party can show a clear record of efforts to resolve the dispute.
The Trustee is essentially telling Judge Spraker:
“We’ve been working on this for over a year, exchanged 40+ emails, production is still incomplete, we’re running into statute-of-limitations concerns, and we need the Court involved now.”
Then she specifically states one of her goals is:
“…set a schedule and parameters for any motion to compel, if necessary.”
⸻
The filing identifies three objectives:
1️⃣ Force DTCC to explain itself
The Trustee wants:
“concrete information from DTCC about a date by which it will produce the Correspondent Clearing Data”
In plain English:
“Tell us exactly when we’re getting the data.”
⸻
2️⃣ Resolve Protective Order Problems
The Trustee specifically references:
“ECF No. 2601”
which is the protective-order framework.
That suggests there may still be disagreements regarding:
confidentiality designations
who can view data
how it can be stored
how it can be used in litigation
A status conference is often faster than filing a lengthy compel motion when the dispute may be procedural rather than outright refusal. ⬅️
⸻
3️⃣ Prepare for a Motion to Compel
The filing expressly says:
“set a schedule and parameters for any motion to compel, if necessary”
That tells me the Trustee has not yet concluded DTCC is refusing outright.
Instead:
Current Position
Production incomplete ✔️
Delays occurring ✔️
Missing data identified ✔️
Court intervention needed ✔️
But
Not yet at “DTCC has definitively refused to comply.”
⸻
Why This Might Be Strategically Better
If the Trustee files a motion to compel today, DTCC could respond:
“We’re still producing.”
“We’re working through confidentiality issues.”
“The Trustee never asked the Court for assistance before filing.”
By requesting a status conference first, the Trustee creates a record showing:
cooperation
patience
multiple follow-ups
attempts to resolve informally
urgency because of limitations concerns
That record makes a later motion to compel much stronger.
⸻
⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰⏰
This paragraph is probably the biggest headline:
“Continued delay in DTCC’s production of the Correspondent Clearing Data risks prejudice to the estate, including exposure to statutes-of-limitations constraints on potential litigation…”
That is unusually direct. 🎯
The Trustee is essentially telling Judge Spraker:
🚨 “I may have claims to investigate, but I need this DTCC data before limitations periods become a problem.”
That is stronger language than we’ve seen in many prior filings. 👀
⸻
This filing may signal:
Near-Term
The Trustee wants Judge Spraker to quickly get DTCC and the Trustee’s team in front of him and explain:
What has been produced?
What remains outstanding?
Why is it outstanding?
When will it be produced?
Next Step
If DTCC cannot provide satisfactory answers or a firm production schedule, then a formal Motion to Compel becomes much more likely.
In other words:
📌 This filing looks less like an alternative to a motion to compel and more like the Trustee positioning herself to file one with maximum leverage if DTCC still doesn’t deliver. 💥
Not legal advice — just an interpretation of the docket and bankruptcy procedure. ⚖️📄
$MMTLP #MMTLP@dbongino@glennbeck@cvpayne@SECPaulSAtkins
The SEC HAS RELEASED THE S1 so can 65,000 investors get on with their lives.
Next - a resolution after 1280 days of PAIN!
$1000+/share resolution is a start!
$5K/share is better!
How will brokers settle their FTDs?