🚨ICE IN AVENEL: CALL COUGHLIN NOW🚨
This morning, there was a confirmed warehouse raid in Avenel, with over 30 workers taken.
@SpeakerCoughlin has done NOTHING to prevent this raid from happening in HIS OWN district.
Let him know: the time to act is NOW.
Call script in 🧵
@savsays@FrontlinesTPUSA@TPUSA Nope. This account is a dog-whistle. Let's remember, blaming the immigrants and downtrodden is the most basic of scapegoats. All the while claiming the other side are "paid shills" while you are the quite literally that. Closer to an influencer than an actual journalist.
As a Crypto Spec Miner/trsder for the last 8 years, I have mined many different algo's and crypto.
I have never been partial to one or the other. I chose each project based on Market Cap at the time of mining, hashpower being aimed at the project, and future potential for growth.
Out of all of the projects I have provided computational power for, Scrypt has by far shown more stability and growth than any other. Second only to Bitcoin.
As a long time trader and miner, I highly suggest people look into Scrypt projects. Each project on the algo provides additional security for the others. They work in tandem to provide protection for one another, vreting one of the safest blockchains in the entire market.
Litecoin is and has been an undervalued, overlooked, and unappreciated for the utility is has provided for the entire space.
Recently, many big money investors have not only shown interest in the technology, but have made bold moves by investing massive amounts of capitol into Scrypt. There is something in Scrypt that has big investors taking an eye and making moves.
Anyone who does their own research, will easily see that there are very few projects that have the "big guys" getting involved. Why Scrypt?
IMHO, Litecoin, Doge and Pep are destined to become household names. Used by the masses as a form of everyday payments and purchases.
The new stock ticker for the entity that bought Dogehash is going to be XDOG. Why?
DYOR, look beyond the hype, look into what isn't being talked about, then again, ask why.
We at https://t.co/yCmFbbxmyr believe crypto is the future of P2P payments. We also believe everyone deserves a chance to participate. We believe in fairness and community. And we spread this information so that everyone can be informed. Everyone deserves to know. Everyone.
@AskPlayStation Seems like just being on your authorized network is where the unsafe conditions are.
Absolutely amazing that there's no PR team or seemingly anyone competent to communicate to the customers.
@AskPlayStation Yeah, been down since 6pm, so 5 hours now… sucks I CAN’T PLAY ANY OFFLINE GAMES I OWN cuz my PS5 can’t verify I own it EVERY TIME I LOG IN instead of, you know, just SAVING THAT INFO TO THE SYSTEM. Sure would make this down time an almost non-issue.
🚀 Exciting News!
Dear community, we're thrilled to introduce the new official account of Robo Inu 🤖💸.
Stay tuned for updates on our innovative journey in the world of #memecoin! Follow us for insights, announcements, and more.
#RoboInu
BlackRock made headlines with the statement in their ad about Bitcoin that "there is no guarantee that the 21 million BTC limit will not change."
The question of whether this means Bitcoin could exceed 21 million in the future taps into the core of Bitcoin's design and governance. Here's a breakdown:
**Bitcoin's Design:**
- Bitcoin was designed by Satoshi Nakamoto with an explicit cap of 21 million coins. This fixed supply is a fundamental aspect of Bitcoin's economic model, intended to mimic the scarcity of precious metals like gold and to guard against inflation.
**Implications of BlackRock's Statement:**
- **Legal Disclaimer:** BlackRock's statement can be seen as a legal disclaimer rather than a prediction or assertion. Financial institutions often include such disclaimers to cover all possible scenarios, especially when dealing with investments in volatile assets like cryptocurrencies.
- **Decentralized Nature:** Bitcoin operates on a decentralized network where changes to the protocol, including the supply cap, would require consensus among a broad spectrum of participants including developers, miners, and users.
- **Hard Fork Possibility:** Technically, altering the supply cap would require a "hard fork" - a change so significant that it would split the blockchain into two versions, one continuing with the original 21 million cap and another potentially with a new supply model. However, this would essentially create a new cryptocurrency, not Bitcoin as it is currently understood.
- **Community Consensus:** Historical precedents like the Blocksize Wars illustrate the community's resistance to changes that could alter Bitcoin's core principles. Any move to change the supply cap would likely face immense opposition from those who value Bitcoin's scarcity.
**Current Discussions:**
- Discussions on platforms like X (formerly Twitter) and various web forums reflect a mix of skepticism and reassurance. Some argue that the 21 million cap is as secure as Bitcoin's code and community allow it to be, while others highlight the theoretical possibility of a change through consensus, though this is seen as highly improbable due to the decentralized governance.
**Conclusion:**
While BlackRock's statement acknowledges the possibility of change from a legal standpoint, there's no practical evidence or widespread belief within the Bitcoin community that the supply will exceed 21 million. The integrity of Bitcoin's 21 million cap remains a central tenet to its identity and value proposition, safeguarded by both code and community ethos. However, in the realm of possibilities, and given Bitcoin's open-source nature, one can never say with absolute certainty that no change could ever occur, but any such change would dramatically redefine what we understand as Bitcoin.