🚨SOUTH DAKOTA🚨
🔥Fun Fact: Senator Mike
Rounds of SD nominated John Thune for “Leader of the Senate”
Primary Mike Rounds on a June 2!
Vote for Navy Vet Justin McNeal and retire Thune’s buddy!
Mike Rounds - FAKE CONSERVATIVE👇🏻
@ABPosse007@BuzzPatterson@EllyceKathy When I was stationed at Pearl Harbor, I didn’t even have to look up to know one was flying overhead. Very distinct sound
@connordave35@USN_Submariner I wasn’t an ST, but they saw my interest in sonar and let me spend a lot of time on the stack during transit. Definitely heard interesting 50 hz contacts!
@Ghostofcynthia I muted him. He had little to offer. Maybe I’ll unmute him later when he realizes his reach will go to zero and he has to make his posts more interesting. It sucks I can’t comment on your posts though. Maybe soon😉
You just nailed it -- there are legacy accounts that built a follower base of millions on the backs of the content they pilfered when there was no penalty for doing so.
In a copyright environment -- which is not present here -- they would be liable for economic damages to creators of the content they have stolen for their own financial gain.
X has simply now evolved to the point where it recognizes the virtue in that view -- it doesn't matter who amplifies the content, it is the content that is valuable. Just as radio stations pay a licensing fee to play an artist's music over and over, those who create content that finds a receptive audience should not be punished by the accounts with bigger "loud speakers."
The content will find an audience because the algorithm is now designed to give content with a high engagement rate broader distribution. So the content creator has the ability over time to build his/her own follower base -- something that was made more difficult by the content thieves like the account that is complaining.