I agree with Dario that we need to pace the frontier. This has been a primary topic of discussions we've had at OpenAI in recent weeks.
Committing to having independent evaluators with employee-like access is a great idea, and we will do the same. We'll have more to share soon.
stop asking Claude one question and thinking you understand the topic. you don't.
Stanford proved a better way. it's called STORM. peer reviewed. 25% more organized output. open source.
the trick: don't ask one question. ask five. from five different experts.
>the practitioner: what do they know that academics miss?
>the skeptic: what's the strongest counterargument?
>the economist: who profits from the current narrative?
>the historian: what pattern has played out before?
>the academic: what does the evidence actually say?
4 prompts. 5 minutes. no software. no GitHub. just paste into Claude.
single prompts give you what everyone already knows.
STORM gives you what nobody else found.
this article has all 4 prompts ready to copy. pick your hardest topic. paste prompt 1. you'll know more in 5 minutes than people who spent days reading.
🚨BREAKING: SK Telecom Triggered Anthropic's Export Controls. Not Amazon
Days before Amazon flagged Fable 5, the White House called Anthropic about one company: SK Telecom
SK Telecom is Korea's largest carrier, investor in Anthropic, and partner of Project Glasswing
WH ordered to revoke SK Telecom's access to Mythos over alleged ties to China
SK Telecom: "Our company has no ties to China”
Anthropic complied and revoked access the same day
THEN the same week, Amazon flagged Fable 5 guardrail vulnerabilities... leading to the export-control letter revoking ALL foreign nationals' access
White House concluded it "could not trust Anthropic to safeguard its most advanced AI technology”