Coach_Tim

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@misupoalsupo @FarvingCo Was that in tablet form? Or by injections into your rotator cuff?

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@dr_ericberg Pork belly

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@LEAPTRADER_ LEAP

[Jonathan Cohler @cohler]

Fossil fuels did not cause the CO2 rise. PERIOD.

Here is why we know, without wiggle room:

Every carbon source has an isotope fingerprint.
Fossil carbon: -28‰.
Ocean outgassing: -8‰. Standard values. Undisputed. In every carbon-cycle textbook. Used by the IPCC itself.

The Keeling plot reads the fingerprint of whatever is actually being added to the atmosphere. Pure mass balance. No models. No parameterizations. No assumptions.

Scripps measured it at four stations, Barrow to the South Pole, from 1978 to now.

Answer: -13.2‰.

Not -28.
Not close to -28.
Not fossil fuel.

Caribbean sclerosponges preserve that same fingerprint back to 1500 AD.
Same value.
About -13‰.
For five centuries.

Across those five centuries fossil emissions rose from essentially zero to roughly 10 billion tons of carbon per year. A ten thousand fold increase.

The isotope needle did not move.

If fossil combustion were driving atmospheric CO2, that needle would have swung hard toward -28‰.
It did not budge.

The two endmember mixing equation is arithmetic a middle schooler can do. Plug in -13.2 for the observed signature, -28 for fossil, -8 for ocean outgassing.
The fossil share of the net atmospheric addition cannot exceed 26%.

Then apply the five century constancy. In 1500 AD fossil emissions were essentially zero, so the observed -13‰ signature had to be the natural signature itself. That fixes the natural mix at -13‰. Plug that in with the modern -13.2‰.
Fossil share of the net addition: 1.3%.
Within noise of zero.

To escape the conclusion you must reject one of:

1. Elementary algebra applied to mass conservation
2. The isotope endmember values the entire carbon-cycle literature has used for sixty years
3. The Scripps and sclerosponge datasets the IPCC itself relies on

Nobody rejects any of them.

The rise in atmospheric CO2 is not the residue of your gas tank.
The isotopes rule it out.
Full stop.

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@Scottobix @SpicyBroadbean RSO

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@dr_ericberg Beef Tallow, Lard, EVOO, Coconut Oil

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@dr_ericberg Ceylon Cinnamon in black coffee

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@Huma3310 Your math is a big problem!

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@Emmiekimis Definitely

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@Quinnc6ld Absolutely

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@neuronirvana_ @AB54281675 @grok @grok what about borax for osteoarthritis and bone spurs?

[Oliver @OWS1892]

Starbucks paid zero tax in 2025 on sales of £556.3m. They got a £13.7m tax credit instead.
What's the benefit of having Starbucks in the UK?
Either tax them on their sales or give the sites to independent British cafes instead.
Stop letting foreign multinationals plunder our country.

[ClarksonsFarm @ClarksonsFarm1]

We see a lot of comments online comparing the financial situations of Jeremy & Kaleb to ordinary farmers, of which they are obviously not.

The vast majority of Jeremy & Kaleb’s financial status is a reflection of their celebrity status, new or old. It is not a reflection of their time spent as farmers.

Most farmers struggle year in & year out. A sector under immense pressure with the goal to feed a nation, please respect them at all costs.🤝

[John A. Douglas @J0hnADouglas]

A heartfelt Fuck You to @Adobe

>I dowloaded a free trial
>Cancelled before trial was over
>Still got billed for a monthly subscription
>Cant cancel my subscription or I get hit with a $99 cancellation fee.

This is the scummiest fucking shit.
I never WANTED this subscription

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@vulturetrades PDF

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@mazemoore @CNN has your reporter personally apologized to this parent on camera? Did you air the apology?

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@ClarksonsFarm1 Yes definitely!

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@SBakerMD RIBEYE!!!

[Coach_Tim @CoachTim888]

@Quinnc6ld Absolutely!