every person who says AI is theft never got an education, and hasn't had a career. they'd hate themselves if they did.
if directly indicates their inability to perform in society, simply because they don't understand things around them.
If generative AI is stealing can someone explain to me how humans consuming content and being inspired is any different? Inspiration and effort aren't unique to humans but your human story is unique to you, and that is what art is about. Telling a story.
I fully admit to being social media retarded, sitting at a low follower count....
but I can see clear as day this is a social detriment from a dude talking about how money will have no meaning in the near future....
please send me a dollar! it's just a dollar! you can feel better knowing I need a dollar! if only 100k people send me a dollar I can afford a vacation to a black hole!!!!
don't worry... anti ai crazies will never make it to market ever again. 100+ ai projects will drown them into oblivion overnight, and perform 100x better.
it's no longer human vs ai, it's progess vs retardation.
If your software is human-coded slop, Iโm not using it.
Itโs just too risky.
AI can find vulnerabilities in human code faster than humans can find and patch them.
Iโm done trusting software written by humans.
AI-coded only from now on.
exactly. also why i close-sourced everything.
if you want it, buy a sub and build it. i'm not supporting the general public anymore with my hard work with PRs or source.
will it into existence since you're all so smart!
Using Ai requires no talent If you can make something in Ai so can I
If you try to argue that your prompt requires extra steps, I can argue that in a year from now Ai will be so smart that those steps won't be neccessary
Why do I need your Ai built thing, I'll just copy yours.
23 lines of tweaking interactions and ensuring state management for the next 3-8 hours boiled down to "it's not acting right" and it figured itself out
looking at a UX bug & i know exactly what to do by hand, and it's basically a nasty state hack to ensure interaction use-cases are stable and consistent.
this is the kinda stuff I *****HATE***** dealing with.
but guess what? ai came to the same conclusion & did it in 2 seconds.
looking at a UX bug & i know exactly what to do by hand, and it's basically a nasty state hack to ensure interaction use-cases are stable and consistent.
this is the kinda stuff I *****HATE***** dealing with.
but guess what? ai came to the same conclusion & did it in 2 seconds.
so did X force 642k people to follow this dude?
i have no fucking clue who this is, even after looking him up i have no desire to know, and would have never clicked FOLLOW for his shitty sad music...
@TheOriginal1010@esrtweet except in every case since the dawn of MONITORS (not computer screens, you troglodyte) they are more expensive than TV's, for an EXPLICIT reason, which is the lynchpin of the entire usecase for this feature.
@esrtweet i'd actually be impressed if anything important was done here... this just disables a few apps and custom builds a home app...
there's nothing of interest here, because you'd need an unlocked bootloader to actually do anything of value.
everything else is a few clicks.