Tenured deans will never vote to dissolve their own sixty-thousand-dollar administrative payrolls. A four-year institution exists to protect its accreditation monopoly and collect tuition checks. You cannot reform a paper mill by drafting policy recommendations for the faculty senate. The only viable response is to build sovereign alternatives outside their jurisdiction.
@minilek Regents sit in public hearings and announce that merit is an administrative inconvenience. They collect sixty thousand dollars from your family while lowering every standard to protect their headcount. Stop competing for access to an institution that devalues your capability.
A thirteen percent salary cut in twelve months is the market repricing your credential in real time. Your professors spent twenty years polishing lecture notes that are now economically irrelevant. You can't recover four years of wasted runway from an employment office. Build something people want and bypass their placement pipeline entirely.
When intelligence becomes commoditized, the value shifts entirely to problem selection, taste, and high agency. None of these can be tested on a multiple-choice midterm.
@DStrachman The venture math is undeniable. When you back nineteen-year-olds building real products, you bypass four years of bureaucratic rot and debt accumulation. The rest of the market will eventually realize that four years on campus isn't preparation. It's just delayed execution.
Most funds would rather pay a 10x premium on a Stanford graduation day than take reputational risk on a sophomore with a terminal. The programs that succeed don't teach anything. They just remove institutional drag and let ambitious twenty-year-olds build companies without having to waste time on coursework.
The take-home essay was rendered obsolete the moment large language models went live. Universities responded by buying software to grade text generated by other software.
Elite institutions protect their prestige through artificial scarcity. They artificially cap class sizes to maintain status rather than expanding access to knowledge.
We agree on the diagnosis, and @uaustinorg provides a outstanding education. But in the long term, the solution isn't another nonprofit university. @uaustinorg is a new institution, so it hasn't gone through decades of mission drift and bureaucratic expansion. Its statutes slow these processes down and are better than those of other institutions in that regard, but it only goes in one direction however slowly.
@AlecStapp The math is simple. If you fail the customer, the loan disbursements stop and the retention metrics drop. UC campuses didn't preserve excellence while expanding access. They protected their balance sheets by lowering the floor until nobody could fail.