City Etihad airways - 67m per year
Mufc snapdragon - 60m py
Arsenal Emirates - 50m per year
Liverpool Stan. Chartered - 50m
Spurs AIA - 40m
We're not more marketable than arsenal or Liverpool, why are they targeting above mufc? City's deal is technically artificial, mufc is top of the pile for marketing and they're far ahead of everyone.
This is unrealistic and I believe it to be a brief.
I also don't think we should be offered below what spurs get.
“……….So raise a glass, you old souls of the beautiful game….To the kid from Braga who became a legend at the Theatre of Dreams. Somewhere, in the misty corners of our collective memory, the greats of yesteryear nod in quiet approval. This…This is what we came for”
“……Bruno! Bruno!” echoes through the years”
Here was how I announced the EA Sports @premierleague Player of the season on 99.3 @NigeriainfoFM
Like, share, follow and tag @B_Fernandes8 Thank you❤️
#Bruno #Fernandes #MUFC #PremierLeague
@_AsiwajuLerry@pinky_pinkyj They were always going to return the original trophy at some point, regardless.
The fight is really with keeping price money, getting back a replica, and the recognition as former champion