@JohnathanRheb What are your metrics for tracking the success of this project? What do you hope to see returned from your efforts initially (other than your account growing)? How would success begin to manifest?
Yesterday, the RPCNA Synod denied all 4 specifications of my appeal and upheld the deposition and excommunication of the lower court. Here is my response:
1. In specification 1, one man argued that the charges should have had Scripture and one man argued that, in a heresy trial, the doctrines must be listed. Yet, of all the procedural injustice that went on that day on Jan 24th, this Synod could not call their “boys” out in the POA—even on procedural matters. Hypocrites must protect hypocrites.
2. In specification 4, only one man (Eshelman) spoke with appropriate force against the excommunication on the ground that I was a Christian. I am thankful for his words. All the others who are argued against the excommunication did so timidly or only on the ground that it was too hasty. Thus, the close vote on this issue (46-47) was misleading. It is hard to know how man of the 46 voted on the basis that I was a Christian, but still, the majority of these men demonstrated that the RPCNA Synod has added to a credible profession of faith. It is no longer faith alone in Jesus Christ that makes someone a Christian, but faith also in racial egalitarianism.
3. Six men voted for specification 3 which argued for “Injustice in the sentence imposed” wherein I asked the Synod to undo the deposition. However, not one of these 6 gave any speeches. This is an indication of the departure of the Word of God from the Synod. These 6 men believed what was done was unjust in substance but had not courage to raise up their voice—and at least 2 of these 6 were ministers. This Synod heard me explain natural affection from Romans 9:1-3, and how I also have benevolent love for all men and complacent love for all Christians. Yet, this Synod refused to hear. As a whole, they hate their own people because they hate God’s word and because they want the praise of the world. And those among them who do understand natural affection were not willing to suffer for it. This Synod will defend sola fide, but remain quiet while their race is removed from off the face of the planet. These men, because of their liberal egalitarianism, are the reason why 250,000 British girls were raped by brown-skinned savages because these men make Whites afraid of being called a “racist” and their liberalism keeps Whites from loving and defending their own people.
4. When the official appeal process started, Pastor Spangler pulled out his camera and began to record. Then the moderator ordered that no audio or video recording could be taken (we obeyed). These men do evil in the darkness and think that God does not see them. Why do they not show the world their wisdom and justice? It is because there is no light in them.
5. Before my time to speak, we all sang Psalm 16D, v.1 “Preserve me, O God, for I am trusting in you.” This comforted me with the assurance that God will preserve His faithful servants as He preserved Christ. Also, the night before in my hotel room, I tossed and turned for 2 hours thinking on how exactly to present my appeal. I felt God granted me assurance and confidence in my speech. Then during Psalm 16D, we sang, v.7 “The LORD who gives counsel to me I will bless, for surely my mind teaches me through the night.” This was a kind token just before I took the podium. The, after the voting, the Synod sang the following Psalm 119Q (v.126), “Lord, it is Your time for action, for Your law they overthrow.” This was a great comfort to me and I hope it struck their conscience.
6. Seeing these men face to face at Synod was very helpful to me in determining their real spiritual state. For, in up-close private interactions, I saw that almost all of them were hypocrites. These hypocrites, by carrying out evil in an orderly and respectful manner, suppress and soothe their conscience. They think that if they are polite, offer a handshake, and smile, they are loving me. Yet, in truth, they are the persecutors of men who are godlier and more zealous for the truth. These men defend historic Reformed theology and contend for the truths of the 17th century yet say nothing about the issues unique to their own day. By doing this they show themselves to be mercenary shepherds who worship their bellies and “compass sea and land to make one proselyte.” Then, after feeding their proselytes liberalism and egalitarianism, they “…make him twofold more the child of hell than” themselves. I hope that the sincere Christians among them will raise up their voice for the canary has stopped singing in the coal mine.
I conclude with a verse that I read in my private worship this morning which comforted me. Isaiah 50:9, “Behold, the Lord God will help me; who is he that shall condemn me? lo, they all shall wax old as a garment; the moth shall eat them up.”
@willspencer@Brian_Sauve These guys showed you nothing but brotherhood until you career climbed at their expense. I have the dms to prove it. You’re a sad example of Moscow fruit brother.