@parousia70@GretchenMafiosa@byroncarroll If the case can't be made from a throughout investigation of Scripture the claim is questionable at best.
The hyper-preterist claim is on the same level as Jesus is not God.
@parousia70@GretchenMafiosa@byroncarroll The Church relies on Scripture to determine orthodoxy. It is our supreme, infallible authority.
The Church, speaking on behalf of Christ, declares truth and error.
Hyper-preterism is a foundationally erroneous system.
@GretchenMafiosa@byroncarroll 1. The Second Coming is a Past Event
2. A Spiritualized, Non-Physical Resurrection
3. The End of the World Already Happened
4. Continuous, Present Eternity
@rootcausesleuth 4. "He does this to show his attributes and his glory to the ones he did choose to save."
Correction: This is partially true, but it omits half of the Reformed view of God's glory. According to the Canons of Dort, God does not display His attributes only to the elect.
@rootcausesleuth ... They are "unable" to choose God because they internally despise Him, not because an external force is blocking a sincere desire to be saved. Therefore, Calvinism views them as fully responsible because they are acting out their own free desires.
@rootcausesleuth 3. "...even though they were born unable to do any differently..."
Calvinism teaches that the non-elect have total physical freedom to do exactly what they want to do. The problem is their want. Because their nature is corrupt, they only ever want to sin and reject God. ...
@Exodus15_11@FDellarosanera@dfziklag Folks might take you more seriously if you weren't in the business of making sweeping sociological claims without any substantiation.
Of course, it would also help if you gave up the dispensational theology.
@rootcausesleuth 1. God is not the author of sin. God created human nature perfectly good. Humanity corrupted itself through voluntary rebellion in the Fall. God decreed that the Fall would happen, but He did not infuse sin into the human heart.