Anti-abortionists use arguments with imagined propositions rather than empirical evidence. The use of the impossible conditional form of "if" helps identify them.
Another Logical Fallacy favorite of theirs is, "Appeal to Emotion".
@PrivateJet0311@Sjacobs2020@ProjectLincoln 😆 There was a big roar from the crowd and Trump didn’t flinch. His friend seated next to him clearly reacted:
Cherry Picking Logical Fallacy
https://t.co/kDW9dFBjb0
@NarrowTheRoad@Jenkins4Florida@ScottPresler@RandPaul@RealxRevolution Losing Reality: On Cults, Cultism, and the Mindset of Political and Religious Zealotry
“A definitive account of the psychology of zealotry, from a leading authority on the nature of cults, political absolutism, and mind control”
https://t.co/gUqAg41ljj
@SaltyCracker9@chiky_handlr When you think you’re smart, but what you say is not.
“As expected, extremely enthusiastic Trump supporters used less cognitively complex and more confident language than their less enthusiastic counterparts.”
https://t.co/yE92PgCpA7
@SaltyCracker9@chiky_handlr Yeah, maturity and cognitive ability lower than wormy trash, obviously MAGA:
The Cognitive and Emotional Sources of Trump Support: The Case of Low-Information Voters
https://t.co/TzEXC6A6sn
@notelikopter@CENTCOM@araghchi@TheMossadIL@MOSSADil@EFischberger@koshercockney American here. The U.S. pumping its chest hasn't done anything to deter Iran. Since Feb. Iran it has become more hardened and dangerous. In fact, pre war Trump ignored U.S. Intelligence report stating a U.S. intervention would not change Iran's regime nor would a war be quick.
@ZssMetc@UmbraInfinite@SueZieCue@JustTheTweets17@MichaelCressw14 Trump’s Appeal to the Cognitively Challenged
"Support for Trump was better predicted by lower verbal ability than education or income," the researchers add. "Our analyses indicate that support for Trump was less about socioeconomic standing, and more about intellect."
@calleymeans@JeromeAdamsMD Self serving corporatist, using a relationship with the white house as a marketing strategy. Why not do it the right way with independent research?
If your childish taunts are mental health side effects of your health initiative, I'm properly disturbed.
@metaenforcer@tarkinness@AFpost "I'd rather lose without Donald Trump than try to win with him": Graham stated in late 2015 that he did not want to win the election if it meant supporting Trump's ideology.
@metaenforcer@tarkinness@AFpost You: “This is how he has always been, he has NEVER changed on anything...”
Graham 2015: "Trump's A Race-Baiting, Xenophobic, Religious Bigot. He Doesn't Represent My Party. He Doesn't Represent The Values That The Men And Women Who Wear The Uniform Are Fighting For."
@metaenforcer@tarkinness@AFpost "Unfit for office" and a "jackass": After Trump mocked John McCain’s war record in July 2015, Graham called him a "jackass" and argued he was unqualified to be commander in chief, calling him "shallow" and "ill-prepared".
@metaenforcer@tarkinness@AFpost Graham: "He's [Trump] Putting Our Soldiers And Diplomats At Risk, He's Empowering The Enemy And This Ban...Would Take People... Who Came To Our Side In Iraq And Afghanistan And Who Are Under Siege In Their Own Countries, It Basically Becomes A Death Sentence For Them."