Nancy Pelosi is back on the board, and the new filing is hard to ignore.
The disclosure shows two sizeable call positions: $INTC , calls worth up to $5,000,000 $UBER, calls worth up to $1,000,000
Both are set at a $50 strike and expire in March 2027, which gives the trades a long runway and makes them more than just short-term speculation.
It is also notable that the filing comes after a quiet stretch since January, especially with Intel tied to semis, manufacturing, and domestic chip policy, while Uber sits in the consumer mobility and platform economy lane.
SOMETHING BIG IS COMING? Maybe just Washington finally treating crypto like a real market, not a side quest.
The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology, and Artificial Intelligence is holding a field hearing on July 17 in New York, titled: “Building the Future of Finance: How the CLARITY Act Unlocks Innovation.”
That matters because Financial Services has jurisdiction over securities and exchanges, and CLARITY is the bill meant to set the rules of the road for digital assets.
Crypto narrative, policy debate, market structure, all back on the table.
Big claims need more than a 239-page complaint and a pile of screenshots. Ro Khanna does sit on Armed Services and is the ranking member of the House CCP committee, which is exactly why scrutiny matters, but allegations and outperformance are not the same thing as proof of insider trading. He has also publicly backed a ban on congressional stock trading, so the real debate is whether the rules are strong enough, not whether a viral post has already proven the case.
@BullTheoryio That is a lot of pages for a very simple point: when you are on Armed Services and lead the House Select Committee on the CCP, the “my household did it” defense does not exactly scream clean optics. Congress keeps asking for trust while giving itself every reason not to get it.
Jared Moskowitz recently disclosed 4 trades, and the interesting part is the sector mix: healthcare, not headline-chasing.
The filing disclosed: $COR, Cencora, the drug distribution side of healthcare, a quieter but important piece of the supply chain $GILD , Gilead Sciences, biotech exposure, where drug pricing, regulation, and clinical pipelines all matter
He sits on Foreign Affairs and Judiciary, so the filing is worth watching for any overlap with health policy, regulation, and broader oversight themes.
https://t.co/M6zrW1Onwn
A 239-page complaint is not nothing, but the bigger issue is structural: when a congressional household is trading at that scale while sitting close to AI, chips, defense, healthcare, and China policy, even “legal” trades can look like an unfair informational advantage.
The question is not just whether anything was illegal, it is whether the rules are too weak for the power they oversee.
Congratulations to @USSROVER for winning our giveaway! Please DM us or join our Discord so we can accommodate you on receiving your prize, thank you everyone for participating, we’ll host more giveaways in the future.
@business Nothing says "strengthening intelligence" quite like reducing intelligence staff days after installing a political loyalist.
Maybe there's a plan. But cutting analysts while global threats are increasing is certainly a choice.
@Cointelegraph The internet wasn't handed to anyone to govern. That's kind of the point.
Its success came from open standards, global participation, and competition, not one country controlling the rules. Crypto may end up following a similar path whether Washington likes it or not.
Our giveaway has started! Click the link below and follow one of the instructions to enter, this giveaway is for a $25 Amazon Gift Card, goodluck everyone!
https://t.co/3S7yxX6M1f
Rep. Cleo Fields just disclosed 208 stock trades, and the pattern is more interesting than any single name.
The filing leans heavily into AI and market infrastructure: $GOOGL / $GOOG, repeated buys, core exposure to search, ads, and AI spending $NVDA, $TSM, $SOXX, semiconductor exposure tied to the AI buildout $PLTR, $CRWV, $ORCL, software and cloud names linked to enterprise and government tech spend $NFLX, $AAPL, $META, $AMZN, big-cap platform exposure across consumer, ads, and digital services $IREN, $OPEN, $UBER, $T, more cyclical names, from data-center power to housing, mobility, and telecom
Fields sits on House Financial Services, including Capital Markets, Financial Institutions, and Oversight and Investigations, so this filing is worth watching for its tech-heavy, market-infrastructure tilt.
Full filing: https://t.co/NLrlcFHcBu
Is Congress timing a local top in Mega-Cap Tech, or just rotating deeper into AI infrastructure? 🏛️🚨
Fresh Capitol Hill financial disclosures from mid-June 2026 reveal a fascinating divergence in how politicians are positioning their personal portfolios.
On one side, we are seeing a coordinated profit-taking exit from crowded tech giants. Rep. Matthew Van Epps (R) executed a massive single-day dump of his core tech winners, liquidating positions in:
🔴 NVIDIA ($NVDA )
🔴 Alphabet ($GOOGL )
🔴 Meta Platforms ($META )
🔴 Microsoft ($MSFT )
But politicians aren’t abandoning the AI trade entirely—they are shifting down the supply chain. Within 24 hours of those mega-cap tech sales, other lawmakers aggressively loaded up on backend data infrastructure and global semiconductor supply lines:
🟢 Palantir Technologies ($PLTR R) - Large position added by Sen. John Boozman (R)
🟢 Taiwan Semiconductor ($TSM ) - Added by Rep. Rick W. Allen (R)
🟢 EQT Corp ($EQT ) - Natural gas player added by Rep. Thomas Kean Jr. (R) to feed AI energy demand
While retail investors continue to chase consumer-facing software, D.C. insiders appear to be rotating directly into physical foundries and energy infrastructure.
Are you following the mega-cap tech exit, or are you staying long on the giants? Let’s hear your rotation strategy below. 👇
The hammer is finally dropping on Capitol Hill’s shadow betting pools.
House Administration Committee Chairman Bryan Steil just officially introduced the Stop Lawmakers from Predicting Act. This massive legislation completely bans members of Congress, their spouses, and dependent children from wagering on prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi.
No more using insider information to trade on binary event contracts, geopolitical conflicts, or backroom policy changes before they hit the public.
The best part? The bill targets the loopholed STOCK Act by replacing the joke $200 fine with a real deterrent: a $2,000 penalty or 10% of the total transaction value (whichever is greater), plus immediate civil enforcement by the DOJ and the forfeiture of all winnings.
If a retail investor traded on nonpublic data, the CFTC would hit them with immediate regulatory ruin. Is a 10% fine an actual structural deterrent, or is it still just a small fee for politicians to play in a rigged casino? Give me your raw takes below. 👇
Forget standard stock trading, insiders are now literally rigging prediction markets on acts of war and political drama.
The DOJ and CFTC are investigating a massive wave of geopolitical insider trading. Special Forces soldier Gannon Ken Van Dyke was criminally indicted for using top secret intel to bag a $400,000 payout on Polymarket by betting on the exact date of Nicolás Maduro's capture. Meanwhile, the FBI is probing George Santos for allegedly gaming Kalshiodds by betting against his own State of the Union attendance.
This absolute circus is exactly why the STOP Corrupt Bets Act of 2026 was just introduced to completely ban event contract gambling on war, elections, and legislation.
If a retail investor traded on classified data, they'd face decades in federal prison. Why do D.C. insiders get away with it? Drop your raw takes below. 👇
The simulation is officially breaking. Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders actually agree on something: The U.S. government needs to own a piece of Big AI.
While Sanders is pushing a mandatory 50% equity tax via the American AI Sovereign Wealth Fund Act, Trump has similarly floated concepts where the American public "becomes a partner" in these trillion-dollar AI firms, following the template of the government's recent 10% equity stake in Intel.
Even OpenAI’s Sam Altman has advocated for a public wealth fund to distribute AI gains.
The debate is no longer about if the government should intervene, it's about who controls the most powerful technology in human history.
Are we looking at a new era of shared prosperity, or the rise of a politically managed tech monopoly? Let’s talk in the replies. 👇
Congress isn’t just treating Wall Street like a personal hedge fund anymore, now they’re turning Washington into a rigged casino.
Lawmakers and staffers are allegedly using confidential, nonpublic information to place massive wagers on political and military outcomes on prediction platforms like Polymarket.
The Senate already sounded the alarm, unanimously passing S.Res. 708 to completely ban Senators and staff from trading these event contracts. Now, a massive bipartisan coalition led by Rep. Jason Crow is putting intense pressure on Speaker Mike Johnson to update House rules and slam this loophole shu
When politicians can bet on the very legislation they control, it's an apex conflict of interest.
If a regular retail investor traded on classified briefings, they’d face federal prison. Should a total ban apply to politicians' spouses and immediate families too? Drop your raw takes below. 👇
Is the era of Capitol Hill "hedge funds" finally coming to an end?
Momentum is shifting fast. A massive bipartisan push is underway to completely ban individual stock trading and prediction market betting (like Polymarket) for lawmakers.
Led by Rep. Jason Crow, a bipartisan coalition is pressuring House leadership to close these massive conflicts of interest. With the Stop Insider Trading Act officially clearing committees, we are closer to a historic floor vote than we’ve been in a decade.
The current STOCK Act's tiny $200 fine is a joke, it’s just a transaction fee for insider trading. Time for real accountability.
BREAKING: New reports show Sen. Susan Collins failed to properly disclose up to $395k in stock trades, violating the STOCK Act, a law she actually helped pass.
The late filings cover 24 transactions made by her husband (a former lobbyist), including $MSFT, $JPM, $CVS, and a recent Pfizer trade, some reported over 100 days past the legal deadline.
Despite polls showing 81% of Americans support a total ban on congressional trading, the pushback from Capitol Hill remains intense.