‼️ It’s now come out that it’s not just the BBC, but ITV and Channel 4 have also had taxpayer funded civil servants working inside their newsrooms during general elections.
Three major broadcasters.. all with government employees behind the scenes helping put together election coverage.
😲 How are we supposed to trust that any of this is impartial?
It looks like newsrooms infested with civil servants helping push state crafted narratives, all at the taxpayers expense.
And we’re supposed to call this independent journalism? Or democratic?! 🤦🏻♀️
We need an independent investigation into these broadcasters AND the governments that allowed this to happen.
What influence did these arrangements have on the news people were watching, public opinion and ultimately how people voted?
The public deserves to know.
- In France they leave pallets of glass bottles to use in riots
- During the BLM riots they left pallets of bricks
- During the ICE protests throughout America they left stacks of bricks to throw at law enforcement
Same playbook, same people funding it. It’s a communist takeover
🚨 NEWS: The BBC has been using taxpayer-funded civil servants to help write and fact-check news coverage on sensitive issues including illegal immigration, Channel crossings and Covid.
An investigation by The Telegraph reveals that 39 government officials have been seconded to the broadcaster since 2018, including staff from the Home Office, HMRC and other departments. Some contributed to articles credited to BBC News and BBC Verify.
The BBC insists these officials had no editorial control and only provided statistical expertise.
The BBC hasn't been impartial for years. Now we discover that Whitehall officials have been helping produce its news coverage, including reports on government policies.
This latest revelation only reinforces everything we've been saying about the broadcaster for years.
U twijfelt eraan of deze rellen in Frankrijk goed gecoördineerd zijn? Dan mag u mij uitleggen waarom er op magische wijze pallets met flessen verschijnen op straat? 17 oktober stond al wekenlang op de agenda, en niet om te protesteren tegen de kwaliteit van het onderwijs.
France is burning and I have to say, watching some of the footage coming out of there today, the hypocrisy is absolutely staggering.
Paris. Marseille. Lyon. Rennes. Toulouse. Angers.
Buildings attacked, cars burning, shops smashed and looted, police and security forces attacked.
Marseille City Hall built in 1653 has been stormed and vandalised, priceless artefacts smashed into pieces. A municipal police station attacked. Lyon’s tourist office set on fire. A fire outside the doors of Cathédrale Sainte-Marie-Majeure.
And they are firing firework mortars at police in Paris, Marseille and Lyon.
Over 270 have been arrested.
Yet it’s people like me who are routinely called “far right” for having an opinion.
Question immigration. Far right.
Talk about borders. Far right.
Raise concerns about integration. Far right.
Say something the left doesn’t like. Far right.
Apparently that is extremism.
But cover your face, dress in black, attack police, smash up public buildings, loot shops and fire mortars at officers and suddenly everyone becomes terribly careful about labels.
Well, here’s the problem.
The French authorities themselves are calling out the ultra-left.
Not me.
France’s Interior Ministry says there has been a “very strong mobilisation” of the ultra-left and has described what is happening in parts of the country as “violent and targeted operations”.
So let’s stop dancing around it.
There is far-left violence on the streets of France.
There are Palestinian flags throughout some of these demonstrations too.
And before anyone tells me that’s something somebody has made up on X, AFP journalists are providing live video and photographic evidence that Palestinian flags are being carried by these violent thugs who are destroying their towns and cities and attacking police and security services.
This doesn’t mean that everyone protesting today is far left. There are ordinary French people out protesting about the cost of living, wages, schools and public services. They have been protesting peacefully in other areas of these towns but their cause has been hijacked by the far-left.
We can’t pretend this isn’t happening just because it makes for an uncomfortable picture.
Then there is the chant from the far-left:
“Louis XVI, Louis XVI, we beheaded him. Macron, Macron, we can do it again.”
They are literally invoking the beheading of Louis XVI and saying they can do it again to the President of France.
That chant isn’t new either. It has been heard at radical-left demonstrations in France before.
Now tell me something.
If this were the far right, would anyone be struggling to find the words?
Masked far-right groups attacking police across several major cities.
Far-right extremists firing mortars at officers.
Buildings on fire.
Shops looted.
A town hall stormed.
A police station attacked.
And crowds chanting about doing to the President what was done to Louis XVI.
It would be called far-right extremism from morning until night.
Every newspaper would have it in the headline. Every television studio would be discussing radicalisation. Politicians would be lining up to condemn it.
And rightly so.
That’s the bit that matters.
I am not asking for the far right to be excused.
I’m asking why the far left should be.
Because I am sick to the back teeth of watching “far right” thrown around at ordinary people who have never burned a building, never attacked a police officer, never fired anything at anybody and never threatened anyone’s life.
Our words are apparently dangerous.
Our concerns are apparently dangerous.
Question government policy and you’re an extremist.
Question immigration and somebody will eventually call you far right.
But actual political extremists put masks over their faces, attack police and burn their way through cities and we’re treated to endless discussion about their “grievances”. It’s just a ‘clash’ with police, nothing more.
No.
You don’t get to have it both ways.
It's all gone quiet on the Peter Mandelson scandal.
It's been all quiet on the Tulip Sadiq scandal, on the Angela Rayner scandal, on Burnham and the Man City scandal, on the Nick Brown scandal....
But a few Reform councillors say inappropriate words and the media meltdown.
My thoughts are with Charlie Latchford. This is awful but now part of a pattern - every underhanded media ploy to paint the party as evil makes these dangers worse.
Unsurprisingly the mainstream media doesn’t seem to want to cover this vile incident.
STATEMENT
I am aware that ITV infiltrated the Portsmouth Reform UK branch for their undercover report. I am featured in their documentary. Not in a bad way, in my opinion, but still featured. I’ll get to that in a minute….
What I am more shocked and disgusted in is that I now know who the two reporters were whom infiltrated us. These two men campaigned with us in March/April in Portsmouth and it leads me to wonder whether their interference in an election is a potential criminal offence.
We have no way to know whether they posted flyers they were meant to. Or whether they gave us correct door knocking information. They campaigned in four seats specifically where, in 3, we lost by a small number of votes. Their involvement would have had an impact on the result.
By default ITV could have literally paid reporters to ruin an election result for Reform UK candidates. That has to be criminal.
On a personal level I allowed these men in my home. I made them drinks. They met my dogs. It’s an entirely disgusting invasion of personal privacy. I have photos of these men and know who they are - I will not disclose them at this stage but may in the future once I’ve gotten advice
In relation to my involvement with the documentary I remain firm in everything I personally said. I was never a member of the Portsmouth Patriots, as the documentary states, but I have supported their movement over the years from the sidelines. The executive team who run them are good people. Yes outside third parties have come in and done some abhorrent things. Those people should be condemned. But the local group themselves are decent, passionate, local residents who care deeply about their community.
I’m appalled by ITV and hope they are held to account for their potential criminal behaviour and election interference. The two reporters involved in infiltrating Portsmouth I hope are held to account for their personal actions in the outcome of elections.
The money, resources and time spent by companies and individuals to damage Reform UK are unprecedented in our political system - you have to ask yourself why?
In Andy Burnham's Britain there will be more restrictions to using using social media than there will be to vote
This tells you everything you need to know
They want to arrest people who criticise the Government online and they want to allow millions of migrants to vote
Andy Burnham’s rushing through a change so you can vote with just a bank card — no photo needed.
That means polling staff can’t check it’s actually you.
They’re left matching a name (sometimes just initials) on a card with no photo.
The Electoral Commission has already flagged security worries.
It’s a clear watering-down of the photo ID rules brought in to stop people voting as someone else. Northern Ireland isn’t doing it.
https://t.co/1QYS9ij8yt
UK Christian Police Community Support Officer Luke Salmons, 46, has received a confidential settlement from North Yorkshire Police after being suspended for questioning claims that Islam is a “religion of peace” and raising questions about jihad, Hamas and Gaza during mandatory diversity training.
Salmons was suspended two days after the session and was later found guilty of gross misconduct and placed on the Police Barred List, effectively preventing him from working in policing.
He appealed, and North Yorkshire Chief Constable Tim Forber subsequently concluded that his conduct did not amount to gross misconduct or breach professional standards, resulting in his removal from the barred list.
Salmons then brought legal claims alleging religious discrimination, harassment and violations of his freedoms of religion and expression. North Yorkshire Police settled the case before it reached an Employment Tribunal, with the amount remaining confidential.
🚨 NEW: Nigel Farage claims Ann Widdecombe would still be alive if the police had checked CCTV of the alleged firebombing on his home
"The bloke given the CCTV didn’t look at it. Why not? Because it’s me. Who gives a fuck about me?"
Andy Burnham is changing the law
You will need an I.D to use social media
You will no longer need an I.D to vote in elections
We can all see what is happening here right?
You were forced to pay for a free house for a convicted criminal illegal migrant.
Only for him to use it as a launchpad to commit sex offences against 2 young girls.
Mohammed Abbas broke into Britain on a dinghy in March this year.
Within 3 months, he was behind bars, arrested for common assault, sexual assault of a female, assault of a constable on duty and assault by beating.
AFTER all of this had happened, Labour still gave him the keys to a £250,000 two-bedroom house in Cardiff.
What did he do with his gift?
2 days after he moved in, he broke into a nearby family’s home, where two children, one under 13 and the other under 16, woke up to find him exposing himself right in front of them.
He was only stopped when the parents heard the girls screaming.
Labour spent hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers’ money on a monster who should never have been in this country in the first place.
This is the insanity the Tories and Labour created.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
Reform will put the Navy in the Channel to secure our border and deport every illegal migrant already here.
There is a cover-up at the heart of Government. Ministers have been forced to admit that the “missing” Islamophobia definition documents do exist.
After pressure from the Free Speech Union and Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy, Angela Rayner’s Communities department has conceded that documents that helped shape the “anti-Muslim hostility” definition still exist, despite previously saying they had been destroyed.
It now seems almost certain that the Government tried to bury evidence that could show whether Islamist extremists helped draft what amounts to Britain’s de facto Islamic blasphemy law.
The Free Speech Union has warned that this non-statutory definition will be used — and is already being used — by activists, public bodies and authorities to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam, its history and its practices.
A review ordered by Will Garton, the top civil servant at the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, found that responses to the Working Group’s consultation on the definition do exist and are “still held on the department’s systems”.
The Free Speech Union threatened the department with a judicial review unless it revealed who had been given the chance to influence the definition.
Enough is enough. There can be no more excuses. Angela Rayner must come clean about what on earth is going on under her watch.
Read more below 👇
This man was having an argument on Facebook.
Some Muslim online insulted his Hindu god, so he, in turn, insulted Prophet Muhammad.
That user screenshot his comment, reported him to the authorities, got him arrested, and now he's set to be executed.
Muslim countries are nuts.
Oh look. That thing that never happens has happened again. Four Afghans (three men and a teen) are jailed for raping a 17 year old girl.
There is no information in the public domain that I can find which reveals their immigration status. I wonder why that is. 🤔
POV: You worked 60 hour weeks for 10 years to finally afford a new build house and move out your flat.
You just waved hello to your new neighbour.
She arrived in Britain 6 months ago, moved in yesterday.
Behold ATM BAR AND RESTAURANTS LTD!
A "cocktail bar" in Wickford was assigned 40 Skilled Worker visa certificates in 2023 and 2024.
One of the 2023 roles was a web designer, for a bar with no website
There's no sign it ever opened. Its only premises was an empty former Santander branch. Betfred plans to run the same unit with 6 staff (124m^2).
It never filed a single set of accounts.
It had £1 of share capital. It got three compulsory strike-off notices while sponsoring dozens of workers.
Its licence was gone by June 2026. The company was dissolved in September.
How was this business EVER allowed to sponsor visas? What "genuine business need" could they possibly have shown for ONE worker, let alone FORTY workers?
What on earth is UK Visas and Immigration doing?