Why are we importing endless low-skilled migrants to steal jobs from British teenagers?
We do not need to ship in Indians to work in fast food restaurants.
@BrpLeics@renyan@ohLurch@KingHaiX Rens always been an egotistical wank stain, his whole life and earnings are attached to CS so he'll keep queueing, he's a maximum level furry libtard. Why the fuck anyone respects him in the CS community is beyond me. He's a Valorant player larping being a cs player.
@0xJackPhantom@RupertLowe10 Just say your are a closet Muslim libtard cuck and move on, quit using this wordy bull shit that makes no sense retard. You spend more time talking to computers than humans and it shows.
How a Restore Britain Government will approach Pakistan.
They have made it very clear that they will not accept their deported child rapists.
How would Restore Britain react?
The response must be swift, ruthless and brutal. Why?
So that others will witness it, and we wonโt have the same problem again.
It would designated as a rogue state on day one.
All immigration from Pakistan into Britain will end.
We will impose trade sanctions and tariffs - the aim will be to hurt their economy.
Dividends and remittances into Pakistan will be taxed.
Foreign aid will be cancelled in its entirety, and we will bill Pakistan for recent spending - we want that money back, our money back.
This would all be applied with allied nations.
Our deportation NATO.
Sanctions from a single country are easier to absorb, but a unified bloc of economies and travel markets creates systematic and severe pressure. Coordinated restrictions would also close loopholes whereby Pakistani nationals bypass our measures by moving through another jurisdiction.
If the Pakistani elites start to play ball and accept their deported rapists, criminals and freeloaders in vast numbers over a sustained period of time?
A debate could then be had about easing trade sanctions.
If done right, it would not be needed again.
A Restore Britain Government will make an example of Pakistan.
Following their scandalous behaviour over the Rochdale rape gang leader, and much else, it is thoroughly deserved.
Britain still has the power. A Restore Britain Government will use it.
Socialists imagine a class struggle. In their made-up fantasy the CEO is in competition with low level workers, the wealthy entrepreneur is stealing from the underpaid nurse.
In reality, workers do not compete vertically they compete horizontally.
Entrepreneurs compete with entrepreneurs. Investors outbid each other. CEOs are benchmarked against other CEOs. Nurses are hired from a pool of nurses. Etc.
The CEOs pay has no correlation to the entry level workers. The Football star on ยฃ300K a week isnโt linked to the person selling drinks in the stadium. A biotech entrepreneur raising VC capital isnโt paid relative to a cleaner.
What is linked is the demand and supply dynamic of each role.
If a company places an ad for a qualified truck driver and 150 people apply for the role, then the company knows it does not need to increase wages for that role. If the company has an open role for months, it is forced to look at the compensation package.
Same for a CEO. A board representing shareholders would like to hire a CEO for a lot less if they could. Their dream scenario would be to hire a CEO who brings in institutional investors, attracts top executives, drives innovation and growth, keeps margins steady and is a good public face for the business even under pressure. It turns out there arenโt a lot of these people looking for work and if you want one you have to pay more than other companies are offering.
The class struggle isnโt vertical itโs horizontal. CEOs are in competition with CEOs. Retail workers are in competition with retail workers. Demand and supply dynamics set the price.
Sure you can say that a CEO wantโs profitability and would like wages to be lower BUT itโs not up to the CEO - demand and supply tension sets the price of workers. An Airline like RyanAir would like free pilots if they could get them but they canโtโฆ so they pay the market rate.
The reason incomes are rising at the top and falling at the bottom is not class warfare. Itโs technology and globalisation.
Technology makes basic jobs simple, remote or fully automated. At the same time tech makes executive roles more leveraged, more important and more valuable.
A CEO used to run a smaller organisation. Today a CEO whoโs 2% better on a $5B company is generating $100M more. Seems sensible to try and pay a few million to get $100M.
Globalisation has put workers from all over the world in completion with each other - downward pressure on wages. Globalisation has given CEOs more market opportunities to explore - upside opportunity to unlock.
The rich are not very interested in buying houses that poor people own. The poor are not buying up the homes the rich want. They are separate groups living separate lives. Try finding the genuinely rich people whose strategy is to hoard normal residential homes - it barely exists as a thing. About 85% of landlords are people who own 1-4 properties. Super-landlords (100+ properties) are 0.2% of landlords and own a tiny fraction of the 30M homes in the UKโฆ and theyโre heavily taxed.
Class warfare isnโt real. Itโs an imagined war in the minds of socialists.
Demand and supply dynamics are real. To the degree it is measured in class, itโs a horizontal competition not a vertical one.
Pakistan has said that it will not take back the Rochdale rape gang leader under any circumstances.
A Restore Britain Government would end all immigration from Pakistan - it would go on our Red List.
Enough is enough.
Pakistan is a rogue state, and we would treat it as such.
@PorcelainTroll Seem to have you pressed constantly, your my biggest fan? And obviously I'm up at 6 am every day working a good paying job while you sit there oggling little boys online like the predator faggot you are ๐ you will never be accepted by conservatives as a old retard fag.
@PorcelainTroll@RupertLowe10 A retard faggot calling someone else closeted is actually funny as fuck ๐๐๐๐๐ keep going bro ๐๐๐ or ma'am ๐๐๐ your that retarded you can't even see the flaw that you are on the same peg as an immigrant as far as being wanted by true Christian conservatives. ๐๐๐๐
@PorcelainTroll@RupertLowe10 Are you mentally disabled? ๐๐๐ You are a homo (against nature and biology) calling me a trans activist ๐๐๐๐ thanks for the laughs tho mate you've made my entire friendship group laugh for the last few days ๐๐๐๐๐
@PorcelainTroll@RupertLowe10 You literally can't even go with your own biology and nature and you talk about critical thought? ๐๐๐๐๐ Thanks mate I needed a good laugh
@PorcelainTroll@RupertLowe10 Some old faggot trying to dictate to anyone else what they say or do is absolutely mind blowing to me. You can't even agree with your own biology you trollop.
DRIVE-BY MEDIA: Most Americans believe that black women are primarily murdered by racist white men. It turns out that 99% are committed by blacks. 91% are committed by black men and 8% are committed by black women. It turns out that 0% are committed by white supremacists. Why does the media want us to think white men are the problem?
h/t @EndWokeness
If you want to start a startup, don't learn "entrepreneurship." Learn how to build things. The hard part of startups is not "entrepreneurship" but product: to know what to build, and to be able to build it.
Sitting down?
Legacy Media increased the term โwhite supremacyโ by 5,296% from 2009-2020.
Violent crimes 2009-2020:
Black on White: 1,162 per 100K Blacks.
White on Black: 38 per 100K Whites.
30X more likely!
Dangers of โwhite supremacyโ narrative is pure propaganda.
Facts.