@YannickBuccella@Skytrader003 Think you have it backwards pal! The tumor lights up because of the radioactive tracer in the sugar solution you are injected with. Prior fasting stops the signal being diluted by ordinary dietary glucose.
Every UK citizen should read @JamesMelville 's post and reflect on the fact that the scientifically, mathematically and economically illiterate ideologue, Milliband, and the Labour Govt under Starmer are destroying the UK economy and causing more and more taxation of decent hard working women and men in the fatuous pursuit of something called "Net Zero".
Even if you believe the unproven hypothesis that human generated CO2 in the atmosphere is the on/off switch for the temperature of the planet the contribution of the UK is beyond miniscule.
At present the atmospheric concentration of the trace gas CO2 is ~420 ppm:
PLEASE NOTE that is parts per MILLION ....
...... it is a trace gas!
Just 420 molecules among a million other gas molecules.
0.04 per cent of the atmosphere.
A very very trace gas, but one upon which all life on Earth depends.
The human body itself is built of millions of molecules all of which were derived from atmospheric Carbon dioxide.
----------------------------------------------
Now here is the result of some simple primary school arithmetic.......
If the UK stopped ALL human generated CO2 emissions TOMORROW it might succed in preventing the addition of just one single molecule to the existing level of 420 ppm.
That is: CO2 concentration would remain at 420 parts per million rather than rise to 421 parts per million!
....... BUT .... it would take 1,500 years for the UK to achieve that miniscule effect .......
Let me repeat that:
1,500 years to prevent one additional CO2 molecule in a milllion others .....
... And only assuming it stopped ALL CO2 emissions TOMORROW!
Of course, even after 1,500 years that ONE single, lonely little molecule in a million others would not, could not possibly, make any difference to "global temperature" (whatever that ill-defined amorphous concept might mean - which is not much!)
---------------------------------------------------
Let me repeat the point calculated from widely accepted values, and using primary school arithmetic.
The great Milliband/UK Govt crusade for Net Zero would only save the addition of ONE single molecule of CO2 to the million others in the atmosphere:
BUT only after 1,500 years having destroyed all civilization in the UK and reduced the nation to poverty and mud huts!
AND the Earth's climate and weather will still be determined by solar and planetary factors far byond human control - as it has been since its creation.
______________________________________
THUS
Anthropogenic CO2 emissions from the UK can make no difference to the climate or the weather.
Not today, Not tomorrow, Not in 2030, Not in 2050, not even in 3500 AD that is ~50 generations away - BUT still no difference.
If readers are interested I will give the detailed primary school arithmetic in a following post.
BREAKING NEWS: The Labour party is contemplating legislation to combat "hate voting". An independent commission will be set up to decide which political parties should be eligible to appear on ballot papers in order to protect democracy. Oh shit! I've just given them an idea!
We warned scientists not to squander people’s trust.
Investigate the lab leak
Don’t overclaim for vaccines
Don’t demand lockdowns
Don’t worship models
Don’t be dogmatic
Encourage debate
They have only themselves to blame.
Just as it was clear in 2020 that Britain's lockdown policies were a social, economic, moral, educational and scientific disaster, so every day it becomes ever clearer that Labour/Miliband's NetZero mania is a national mistake of epic proportions. Our energy policies are suicidal
@SamaHoole Me: "It's interesting that the PET scan used a sugar solution to locate my tumors"
Nutritionist (face like a slapped arse): "There is absolutely no evidence of that!"
Whilst you were all busy with the Epstein news, Mad Ed has unleashed fresh Hell on the UK
He’s handed subsidies to 134 new solar farms across England and 23 in Wales and Scotland AND approved 28 large wind farms, mostly on Scottish and Welsh hillsides. On prime agricultural land!
All of which bill payers and tax payers will fund. Without our money these businesses aren’t even viable.
You are watching the economic and cultural bankrupting of a nation in real time… it’s like a horror movie 🚨
“Let’s spend £4.5trillion on net zero over the next 25 years. Let’s ban new oil and gas licences in the North Sea but spaff away £40billion buying North Sea oil and gas from Norway. Let’s buy coking coal shipments from Japan but ban UK coal mining. Let’s plaster thousands of acres of farmland with solar panels but spend £50million on sun dimming experiments. Let’s give Drax an estimated £1.8billlion in taxpayer funded subsidies on top of the £11billion it has already received despite Drax burning an amount of wood equivalent to 300 million trees. Let’s give £1.5 billion of taxpayers’ money this year alone to wind power companies not to generate power from their wind turbines. And let’s spend £30billion of taxpayers’ money on carbon capture machines but put pensioners, farmers and the disabled into financial peril by falsely claiming there’s a £22bn black hole.”
@Tony_Royle On the one hand he might be just as thick as his dad. On the other, if you own many thousands of acres of land and you can be paid handsomely to host solar and wind farms....
@Christianitymag Multiple accounts of the man, from people of all races who knew him, have flooded in and none have doubted either his faith or his love for his fellow human beings. I intend to find out more about this extraordinary man and I suggest you do to.
@Christianitymag I am not a "believer" but I have a profound emotional attachment to the teachings of Jesus Christ. You clearly doubt Kirk's Christianity, but you don't acknowledge that charity is the greatest Christian virtue; and your piece shows no charity towards Kirk. 1/2