One day tourists will visit Ukraine.
Not to see war.
But to see the country that refused to disappear.
And they’ll understand why we fought so hard for every inch of it.
His name was Joan Sebastian Guerrero.
- He was here legally.
- He was authorized to work.
- He had Social Security Number.
- He was NOT target of ICE investigation.
- DHS: He did NOT try to kill ICE agents.
He was executed in front of his 3 year old daughter.
Paging Kerry Roberts:
Please kindly tell your cousin, Melissa Reynolds, to lay off. She has already threatened me once and every time she speaks on your behalf is more evidence of the harassment I have endured since October 2024 (which can and will be proven if need be). 🫶
Why is the state of Massachusetts protecting Michael Proctor.
JUDGE GILDEA NEEDS TO BE RECUSED.
Judge Mark Gildea is a specially assigned judge that cannot remain impartial, while making decisions based on media coverage which is improper.
The courts must think the people of Massachusetts and the general public aren't going to notice. This is a disgrace to the justice system and the founding fathers of our country.
No one should ever be punished for speaking out against corruption. No DA should ever weaponize the law against the public to protect corruption.
Who agrees that the ICE officer that shot and killed Lorenzo Salgado Araujo should be arrested and charged with his murder? They wore no body cameras and lied about what happened saying he ran into them when the surveillance footage shows he didn’t. They also had the wrong guy.
Judge Gildae plays semantic reindeer games & Judge Graf melts under pressure faster than Frosty when faced with ruling. Both situations have court viewers seeing red.
Analysis today on Caught In My Web. Subscribe on Patreon. 🕸️
The filings submitted by Karen Read's attorneys after the July 1st hearing paint a very different picture than what was presented in court regarding the Michael Proctor "health information leak".
One of the biggest revelations is that, according to Read's attorneys, it was Michael Proctor's own counsel who brought Aidan Kearney's X post to Judge Gildea's attention. The very post that became the foundation of the emergency hearing was submitted to the Court by Proctor's team.
Read's attorneys argue that the post was then misrepresented because its timestamp was interpreted incorrectly. During the July 1st hearing, Judge Gildea stated that the X post appeared approximately 30 minutes after Proctor's attorneys emailed additional materials to the Court on June 8th. That timeline formed the basis for the Court's concern that information from provisionally impounded filings had been publicly disseminated.
Read's attorneys now say that timeline is factually wrong. Their supplemental filing explains that X displays timestamps in UTC under certain settings. To support that argument, they attached X's own explanation of its time zone display along with screenshots of the post. According to Read's attorneys, Aidan Kearney's post was actually published at 10:52am EST, more than three hours before Proctor's attorneys emailed their supplemental filing to the Court at 2:22pm.
Read's attorneys also argue that the information was already public before Proctor's filing. They point to additional X posts and a YouTube livestream discussing the same information before the supplemental filing was ever emailed to the Court and counsel.
If Read's timeline is accurate, this was a tremendous expenditure of judicial and litigant resources over a factual misunderstanding. 🗣
Every attorney in the case was ordered into court where a total of 32 certifications were submitted. On top of that, discovery was interrupted. The Court discussed the possibility of contempt, sanctions, dismissal, and default. Read's attorneys were then forced to file both an Emergency Motion to Clarify the Record and a Supplemental Memorandum asking the Court to correct what they describe as an inaccurate factual premise.
In my opinion, this filing makes one thing abundantly clear: Michael Proctor's legal team appears to be doing everything they can to keep him from sitting across the table from Alan Jackson again.
First came the emergency motion to delay the deposition, then the motion to impound, then the emergency hearing. Now Read's attorneys are arguing that the very basis for that hearing was built on a timeline that was wrong from the start.
If that's true, this was supposed to stop a deposition but that strategy has completely backfired. Instead, it may have created one of the biggest self-inflicted legal headaches we've seen in this litigation thus far.