I'd really like to hear from @NAACP, @ReverendWarnock, @RepJeffries, & @TheBlackCaucus to know your thoughts on this.
We have multiple videos of Left-wing Democrats shouting racial slurs at federal agents who are racial minorities. Why do Democrats think that's ok?
“N*gger you’re next” from a liberal white democrat to a black law enforcement agent. And the @NAACP president, Derrick Johnson said not a damn word, neither did the Congressional Black Caucus, or @RepJeffries or @AOC or @ReverendWarnock. @TheBlackCaucus@DerrickNAACP
Wokeness is the most successful rebranding of evil in human history
It takes racism, division, and hatred, wraps them in the language of compassion and justice, and calls it moral progress
It made people cheer for the destruction of their own societies while feeling morally superior for doing it
Under capitalism, socialists are free to build socialism.
Under socialism, capitalists aren’t free to build anything.
Nothing stops a group of socialists pooling their money, forming a company, and splitting every wage and every pound of profit perfectly equally.... Or to donate all profit to the government.
It’s legal. It’s easy. Owning the means of production is as simple as setting up a company.
Marx wrote his manifesto before the invention of limited liability companies. Back then “seize the factory” meant seizing it from the handful of families who could afford one.
That argument expired the day anyone could start a company with limited liability, raise investment and hire who they want.
Socialists are free to lead by example and demonstrate their system works. They can out-recruit, out-motivate, out-build and out innovate based on their ideas if they like. It would prove the philosophy works. Capitalism will happily host their experiment.
The fact that nobody does this tells you a lot.
@Kapow821@BritisherPaz49 Are you serious? Why should he change the wording if he's literally just describing what's happening before our eyes in the video? Gtfo.
@GhostofMapl@scottphall44@hodlonaut The sandwich you ate you shat out of your body within about 24 hours or so. Core v. 30 w/ uncapped OP_Return has been run by about 20%+ of network nodes since release, so we're talking about 9 months of correlation. Maybe it's not causation, but it's definitely correlation.
@GhostofMapl@hodlonaut He didn't "correlate it" (you used that as an active verb).
It quite literally is correlated. You can argue that it's not indicative of causation, but it is correlated without question. It's not even debatable.
The only thing that stops violent men from raping you and your society are other men who are equally willing to be violent in stopping the rapists. The West has decided that the highest virtue is to quietly comply with the destruction of your civilization because to do otherwise is bigoted toward the rapists. It really is that simple.
@GhostofMapl@BashCo_@hodlonaut@GrassFedBitcoin Nearly 80% of Bitcoiners running nodes are either sticking with earlier versions of Core (with OP_Return capped) or they're running Knots. Knots is close to 23% (more than Core v 30.0+). Is that meaningless to you?
@GrassFedBitcoin@BashCo_@cguida6 It wasn't permitted for years on r/bitcoin. They started removing posts, comments & then permanently banning those who advocated for the 2 MB increase more than a year before the '17 HF & ever since. Full censorship on that sub.
@BashCo_@GrassFedBitcoin@cguida6 How exactly are you purporting that his question & his comment above are in any way like asking how many genders there are? This is a bizarre comment @BashCo_.
@B7frankH@Number10cat I asked Grok, & there's a lot of good information in his reply, however it still doesn't explain how the gov't in the UK justifies the very clear double standard in favour of Islam. If any Brits can add anything I'm genuinely curious how they justify it.
https://t.co/m42lRMDze2
@B7frankH Can any Brits explain to me how the gov't in the UK justifies arresting Christians for preaching in public, but simultaneously allows Muslims to broadcast Islamic calls to prayer *via loudspeakers* on a regular basis? How do they explain the disparity in treatment?
@Number10cat ?
@nattiem96@GenDSouza2@TheSCIF Disagree, respectfully. Also disagree that it would be likely to be prosecuted if he denied actually doing it & claimed the video was merely "a joke".
I do agree we don't *know* he did it. Could've just been a joke in his case.
@krushing137@hodlonaut@Conza@CobraBitcoin@TulsiGabbard I'd doubt @CobraBitcoin controls the r/bitcoin sub-reddit, or if he's still a mod, I'd doubt he would be of the ilk to ban users for directly or indirectly supporting BIP110. Then again, I could be wrong. Would be good to hear a reply from him on this question.
@scottphall44@cguida6@bradmillscan@hodlonaut@KylePLeBlanc Even in 2015 the debate wasn't too bad. That's when people started talking abt the idea that blocks would soon fill & txn fees could spike, impeding P2P e-cash usage. In 2016 the debate got more intense, & r/bitcoin started banning anyone advocating for increases in block-space.
@nattiem96@GenDSouza2@TheSCIF 1) Not everybody is smart.
2) He could have easily disposed of a few Trump ballots & correctly assumed he would not be prosecuted for the same as long as he simply denied doing it. He'd have been right to assume no prosecution.
@BashCo_@hodlonaut You don't think it was a contentious change when Core proceeded with removing the OP_return cap in v. 30.0 against widespread objections? What seems very inconsistent is what you acknowledge to be "contentious". What @GrassFedBitcoin & @hodlonaut advocate has widespread support.
This is indeed real, and if it doesn't boil your blood, you're effectively an apologist for violent, oppressive, dictatorial regimes extremely lacking in human rights, where women & gays have no rights whatsoever.
Iran has just been nominated to preside over the UN Committee for the protection of women's rights, human rights, and the prevention of terrorism.
YES, IRAN. And it was supported by the United Kingdom, Spain, and France.
This is not a joke. It's real.
- @isaacrrr7
@nattiem96@GenDSouza2@TheSCIF People post all kinds of things for likes & followers. Some may not be true, but other times they might post bad things they do for the engagement, knowing they won't likely get into any real trouble. Why would he admit it if he actually committed a crime? He would just deny it.
@nattiem96@GenDSouza2@TheSCIF How was a "Debunked"?
Per Reuters he was asked & then he claimed it "was a joke". That's not debunking anything. If he had done what he appeared to do on camera (& what he claimed to do), it's a federal crime. So obviously he'll deny it if asked after doing it.