So what does this mean for the recent past and the future tariffs?
Broadly, my thesis is that individual tariffs have a different mix of motivations belonging to different categories, which implies different durability, but overall, tariffs are not going away anytime soon.
1/
What is the point of Trump tariffs?
I am not going to pretend I know the answer. As a matter of fact, I don’t think there *THE* answer.
This thread is really just a place for me to put my semi-structured thoughts on this question, so that I can go back to them in future...
1/
@SuburbanBourbo2 (1) yes, to a large degree, (2) risk aversion and internal politics (as dove you prefer to slow things down, as otherwise you risk hiking more on adverse news in future).
The pushback against insurance is interesting but also predictable.
For hike to be an insurance hike it makes it sound like it is unnecessary, which makes Lagarde uncomfortable. Hence the pushback...
Personally, this sentence to me reads like one word: insurance.
This (and September) are insurance hikes allowed by rates being at lower end of neutral range.
Funny.
But actually I think both are true. July pause is more likely, but hike is possible if things (oil or inflation) get worse by then. We are now at 30-40% probability.
ECB sources vs. counter-sources game is up to another level.
*ECB GOVERNORS EYE JULY PAUSE AFTER FIRST HIKE
*ECB OFFICIALS SEE NEXT RATE HIKE POSSIBLE AS SOON AS JULY
Another way to see this is through the mandate: It would be harder to argue for this hike if ECB had dual mandate, but under single inflation mandate it is the more of a right choice.
In other words, I am with (almost) everyone else in thinking that this is an unnecessary hike, but also as @darioperkins pointed out, likely it will not matter much at the end of the day.
@ClausVistesen I am sure it is, but you make a different argument to the council itself at this point... You will start arguing by neutral when you are at 2.5% and hawks push for another hike.
Personally, this sentence to me reads like one word: insurance.
This (and September) are insurance hikes allowed by rates being at lower end of neutral range.
🇪🇺 Our take on ECB staff projections:
- core HICP looks a bit low in 2026 (even accounting for a June setback in services) but a bit high in 2027 (too much pass-through)
- headline HICP back to 2% in 2028 (likely below 2% by Q4 2028)
- GDP growth still too high in 2026 (Ireland)
"What will happen to Europe if it keeps ignoring AI?"
Three American labs each (!!) operate more AI compute than all of Europe combined. Today we're launching Europe 2031: a story of what might happen if that doesn't change.
@pietergaricano While the broader point is true, this chart is misleading because definitions of unemployment differ. If you compare the more comparable unemployment rates (normal in eurozone and permanent layoff in US) this are much closer to each other.
This time is different for energy-intensive sectors in Germany (for now?). Disrupted supply from Middle East, surging prices and soaring demand for precautionary inventories have given a temporary boost to energy-intensive firms in Europe especially chemicals.
This is another month when eurozone #GDP will separate those doing serious analysis and those chasing headlines.
GDP growth was revised to -0.23% q/q, but basically unrevised at +0.23% when excluding volatile Ireland, and not that much below last year’s growth.
1/
This was my favourite episode of our podcast. Not just because of the topic (inflation and monetary policy), but because we really nerd-ed out this time around, as Barbara Teixeira Araujo put it. So much fun, give it a listen!
https://t.co/LEW7h1ryVb
Overall, Q1 was always going to give up some of the boost 2025q4 brough, and so 0.23% growth is not too bad.
But the composition certainly brings some sour taste, especially now that consumption will be weak (if not negative) in Q2 thanks to Iran war.
9/9
Also, jump in net exports was pretty much offset by a drop in inventories – and here, if anything, we are still abnormally low and due for some contribution this year.
8/