Cristilyn

I read and write and ride a bike.
I sing and dance and rhyme by chance.
But most of all the things I do,
I love to pray and gaze at You.

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@lisaknows429 Why are you in my feed?? 😩

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@cantfixowls @baroncoleman @Lilyftsobv These are fine folk. They have a beautiful big family from what he’s shared. Again, when people can’t win the argument they try to attack the person.

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@MattWallace888 Good thing it’s in 4k HD cause I could think of a dozen or more women that look like this

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@marika2me @MikeWingerii No he was not wrong, nor were the many voters crimes that came forth or the whistle blowers and journalists and investigators. you want to stand with the liars, go ahead.

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@MelanieNicole06 Here’s some free life advice dear- major in the majors, minor in the minors 😑 and don’t waste peoples time w pettiness

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@LionelMedia People don’t get stupid. The original picture is on Erikas insta. It was a selfie CK took. That arm and hand was added by a creative bored person with Ai

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@TheOrangeCatBad @DrFrankTurek So does the guy gets to decide what wife watches? How about who she talks to? Who she’s friends with? Where she goes, when she goes? 🫪 I’d run

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@lisaknows429 This. Is. Not. A.Thing. People!! It’s just exposing a lack of connection, compassion or love in these couples. Example, my husband is obsessed w baseball and tells me all these stats and plays 🙄 and I could care less really but I sit there and listen and nod CAUSE I LOVE HIM!

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

This is so dumb. Spouses have different hobbies and interests and it’s love that causes us to respect and even lean into our spouse’s interests, not demand or threaten them to stop those interests (unless they’re self harming). This such a bad look for the CO haters. DESPERATION

[lisaknows @lisaknows429]

🚨Candace Owens Is Destroying Marriages!

And how does she respond she claims it’s propaganda against her and laughs! I can tell you it’s an ongoing trend I have seen in the wine mommy candy cult sleuths for over a year now!

Thankfully, some of these women listened to their husbands, left, and are much better off because of it. While other wives are doubling down refusing to listen to their husbands.

It took me less than a minute on Reddit to find a post from a husband saying Candace conspiracy content is destroying his marriage.

These women are legitimately addicted to this and it's ruining their families! Don't even get me started on the moms who are bringing their children into this nonsense!

[joey kim @joeykim23790]

@lisaknows429 Lisa, your tweet is destroying my marriage.

Great now you need to delete your X account and stop tweeting or you’re going to hell you demon.

Man, this is easy. I should had start accusing people of ruining marriages long time ago

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@thevivafrei @DiligentDenizen @baroncoleman Awww how cute.. your little ChatGPT thingy you got there

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO You’d love to be this relevant

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@SharrellAnne2 I can’t believe this is going this far. CO ruining marriages, really? My husband and I exchange conspiracy theories like it’s a hobby. He’s not particularly into CO but there’s no way we’d divorce over petty differences like this. Know what I see? You guys are looking desperate

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@bennyjohnson

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@MikeWingerii 2/2
Why wouldn’t you want TPUSA looked into? Why is its leadership off limits? Why are so many ok with questionable texts and grainy footage and so ready to charge, and send to his death, oh and “forgive” “That young man!”? Why is logic and rationale on pause with this case?

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@MikeWingerii 1/2
Mike I started following you after the IHOP-KC scandal, my church was an offshoot, local house of prayer. After that, I watched mega church after mega church fall in similar ways. I learned that Jesus owes nothing to mega institutions built “in His name” with corrupt leaders.

[The Original Tyra @tyralins]

Blake, I appreciate your response, but this is exactly the concern I was raising.

You write that Charlie "was perfectly capable of realizing a person was obsessed with money or attention," that he was "growing apart" from Candace, and that he wouldn't publicly distance himself because of his character.

Saying Charlie "was capable" of recognizing Candace as "obsessed with money or attention" is using your interpretation of Charlie's thoughts to assign a negative motive and character judgment to Candace. Unless Charlie himself explicitly expressed that view, it is not a documented fact.

Disagreements about actions, statements, or decisions can be discussed with evidence. But attributing motives like greed or a desire for attention moves the conversation from observable facts into assumptions about someone's character.

Andrew has made similar claims, but then asks us to believe Charlie was "walking on egg shells," "knew she would turn on him," or "had anxiety whenever she called." Those would have been Charlie's internal thoughts and emotions, and unless you have texts, emails, recordings, or other evidence where Charlie expressed those things, those are also just interpretations, not established facts. There's an important difference between recounting what someone said and claiming certainty about what they thought.

Meanwhile, the public record is clear. Charlie repeatedly defended Candace, refused to condemn her under pressure, and weeks before his death said on camera in no uncertain terms that he and Candace were "great friends." Not just friends, not just good friends, but great friends. I believe him.

On one side, we have evidence: Charlie's own recorded words, spoken in his own voice, and the clear, uncut video depicting that. On the other side are retrospective accounts of what others say he said or privately thought. You are asking people to conclude that Charlie's public statements did not reflect his true views. You are asking people to conclude he lied.

It is unfortunate that, in defending your position, Candace's motives are repeatedly disparaged through labels given by others yet attributed to Charlie. Whether someone agrees with her or not, that shifts the discussion from verifiable evidence to subjective character assessments.

Finally, if Charlie intentionally chose not to publicly disavow Candace because that was HIS character, how can anyone know with certainty what he would say today? When someone is no longer here to speak for themselves, I believe their own recorded words and actions deserve the greatest weight.

I'm not asking anyone to accept Candace's version of events, but I AM asking for a consistent standard of evidence-from everyone.
________________________________________
I believe Charlie Kirk was a great man, and his loss was felt around the world. That moment left a vacuum, an undeniable absence, a dimming of the light.

He was far from perfect, but he worked hard to get as close as he could. I believe that is why even strangers felt it. People who had never heard his voice or seen his face felt it.

I wrote a song I called "We are all Charlie now" because I could feel that loss - but that loss also changed something.

When I had young children, I was the tooth fairy. I was also Santa Claus. My children are grown now.

On September 10th of 2025 I was devastated and wasn't sure why I felt it so deeply. On September 11th, I knew. I am Charlie Kirk. We are all Charlie now.

https://t.co/MxpoImpFun

[The Original Tyra @tyralins]

I'll repeat: The problem I keep having with responses like this is the implication it creates about Charlie himself.

It asks people to believe that Charlie publicly defended Candace, publicly said he would not allow himself to be pressured into abandoning a friendship, and publicly expressed respect for her, but privately held a very different view and was only saying those things for the camera.

If that is the argument, then it is not just a disagreement about Candace. It calls into question Charlie’s own sincerity and character. It suggests that his public words were a performance and that the “real” Charlie was only revealed in private conversations that cannot be verified.

That is a serious claim to make about someone who is no longer here to respond. The evidence we actually have is Charlie’s own recorded words and actions. If someone wants people to believe those were not genuine, the burden should be on them to provide something more than a private recollection.

[Diligent Denizen 🇺🇸 @DiligentDenizen]

FULL UNEDITED version INTERVIEW with RESTAURANT EMPLOYEE EYE WITNESS who SAW TYLER ROBINSON IN PANGUITCH, UT EVENING OF Charlie KIRK'S ASSASSINATION 9/10/2025

- 8:55pm Tyler Robinson orders dinner at Cowboy's Smokehouse

- 9:47pm pays his bill & leaves Cowboy's

Panguitch is 2 hours 57 minutes drive from UVU shortest route

Alleged texts between Tyler Robinson & Lance Twiggs begin 11pm on 9/10 give real-time updates that Robinson would have to be present in Orem to send (search dogs, etc)

Robinson was allegedly stopped by a patrolman in Orem at 12:30am 9/11 (Robinson would have to speed 90–100+ mph entire trip w/o stopping)

Robinson's presence in Panguitch make it IMPOSSIBLE for him to have sent real-time update text messages at 11pm and be stopped by police at 12:30am

This would mean the texts are fake.
If the texts are fake, the confession is fake.
It would also mean that Lance Twiggs is in on the lie.

Listen closely for a VERY important DETAIL previously not disclosed 👇🏻🫡 🗒

[Cristilyn @Cristilyn7]

@paramounttactcl You sound like the little brother swinging at the legs while the big boys take on the real fight