@_yessuh_@SrinjoySen3363 He was also shot with a 40mm at point blank range which would also explode a normal person even if it’s too close to detonate.
@heinygoy@metallikat05@thoughts17181 Right, I should have used the word “grant” instead of believe. Now, pretend I did and contend with what I said instead of being retarded and obfuscating about the irrelevant bullshit.
“Just a thought exercise”
Yeah, a thought exercise requiring me to believe in an omniscient fortune teller who never experiences/will never experience anything positive who also somehow doesn’t wish to die.
Your hypothetical is retarded. You’d probably have a better education if you attended that Learing Center.
@heinygoy@metallikat05@thoughts17181 lol it was YOUR absurd hypothetical and your criticism was just “don’t think about it too much” because you’re retarded and can’t handle a nuanced response that’s more than just a yes or no.
1. I reject your premise. There is no logical scenario where an entire person’s existence is 100% pain and suffering and they have omniscient foreknowledge of the future to know their life would never improve AND not wish to die. The only reason they would have to live would be the hope of improving their current conditions and you ruled that out by giving them foresight.
2. If it’s against their will, there would be no reason good enough to kill an innocent person. It’s not for me to decide if such a person has a reason to live. It would have to be their own decision.
I made an assumption based on your scenario that this person’s life was 100% pain and suffering and they had foreknowledge that it would never improve. Given your circumstances, I believe they’d either kill themselves or at the very least request someone else to do it.
Absent their consent, no, it would not be okay to kill them.