@Lawmankjv@PoliceThePolic1 Better question: What is is considered when applying trafficking to an innate right? I can think of one such example.... Kidnapping for a profit motive at the expense of the victim.... Now what is another way to phrase that? Here's a hint: Executive Order 13818
@PurebloodTweak@PoliceThePolic1 your innate rights to identity and unlimited contract, to deceive you into agreeing to play a role, a puppet on strings.
@PurebloodTweak@PoliceThePolic1 expending your labor for some sort of profit/gain for the servicing towards another man. No one has superior claim to the product of your labor. Your energy is your own. I would hope you would not consider yourself to be a slave. They are taking advantage of your ignorance of...
@cryptonadafomo@PoliceThePolic1 to be in such a role/position, you become liable as the trustee to that creature. The same thing we should be doing to our government/agents/agencies as sovereigns.
@cryptonadafomo@PoliceThePolic1 your private capacity under your innate rights is a 'traveler'. You can still accept payment under this case, but that is you trading your labor for some other form of value. What the government is really doing is regulating their creatures. That's the real trap. When you claim..
@Gary84464527359@PoliceThePolic1 Freedom is inherently risky and dangerous by it's nature. Adherence to man's code is irrelevant. You would still be liable for harm or loss caused to another living man regardless of if you follow the fabricated pieces of paper or not. They are guidelines to determine liability..
@anti_occult_ont@PoliceThePolic1 The public roads are the we the people's property. Using them is a right of every single member of that shared trust. Attempting to impose what you are claiming is called trust fraud, and a mariad of crimes under title 18.
@DLHoffmeister@PoliceThePolic1 And that arrest would be unconstitutional, and by definition a mariad of crimes under title 18. Just because you are faced with an ultimatum doesn't make the ultimatum lawful or morally right. People who enter a banking establishment could be facing being held up at gunpoint.
@ThomasFrisch8@JJ_H2K@Yoli22258018@Dagz_Houz@davidicke Irrelevant. They are paid to do a job. If that job consists of rescue or recovery, they accepted the paycheck. They freely choose to do it. Your rational is contradicting with your conclusion.
@lewisgsd@Nathan_Straus_@povcops If its not up to them, then extortion should be processed as such. You don't get to steal someone else's property or hold it for ransom. If he parked on your property, post signage that gets an implied contract agreement, and take him to small claims or post a lien on him for...