David Cross

Trial lawyer specializing in antitrust, intellectual property, and commercial litigation as well as information governance ... and unsolicited opinions.

[Miles O'Brien @milesobrien]

🎙 On this #ElectionDay, I'm excited to share an important episode of my podcast with Donna Curling, a relentless advocate for secure voting, to discuss her ongoing case, Curling v. Raffensperger. Her story is one of resilience and dedication. 🔗https://t.co/JgyNA1C96T

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@GabrielSterling The absence of evidence of systemic fraud in prior elections does not mean that future elections are necessarily secure. Under that logic, we need not worry about any system that’s never been breached before. But that’s naive. And bad policy.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@AnnaBower @ASFleischman If by groveling you mean law firms fighting over you, then your statement makes sense. Keep up the great work! We need more journalists like you!

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@Rasmussen_Poll @GAballots @MarilynRMarks1 Please correct your tweet. You credited the wrong David Cross. I’m lead counsel for some of the plaintiffs in this case and my firm retained Dr. Halderman for this important work.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

Proud of the firm and my colleagues on this well-deserved recognition

[Morrison Foerster @MoFoLLP]

MoFo received record levels of recognition in the 2023 edition of Chambers USA, including 53 practice area rankings and 116 individual recognitions across the publication’s categories. Read more about this year’s results: https://t.co/wxR032RqVq

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

Remarkably @GaSecofState own #cybersecurity consultant and former White House CIO advised that a US election hack isn’t an IF, but a WHEN. This isn’t crazy conspiracy nonsense. It’s a real threat. Raffensperger’s approach to #ElectionIntegrity is reckless and unlawful.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

One wonders if @GaSecofState still doesn’t understand election security or if this is deliberately misleading. He knows hash values provide no meaningful security as @CISAgov confirmed a year ago. Voters deserve better. #ElectionIntegrity #CyberSecurity https://t.co/eHJYVj5B3s

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

Calling for reasonably secure elections in GA doesn’t make one an election denier or a conspiracy theorist. It’s the right thing to do for voters. Those who oppose reasonable election security like @GaSecofState ignore science and reality and needlessly put voters at risk.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

How To Alienate Jurors 101: Start your cross w/ condescending misogyny toward alleged rape victim. Could’ve accepted the nod but had to exert control — just like his client. Not a good look. Empathy matters. #DonaldTrump #EJeanCarroll #ejeancarrolltrial https://t.co/cfPOhYovCy

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@PatCollins63 @GabrielSterling Competition is good. The more competition distributors face, the better for suppliers, retailers, and consumers - and smaller distributors. Let suppliers and retailers make their own choices. End distributor monopolies and help small businesses and consumers in the process.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@PatCollins63 @GabrielSterling Distributors already can choose what products they decide to carry, at least as to the two largest ones that dominate the industry. Those distributors add cost and limit choice. Suppliers are required to deal with distributors to get their products to market.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@PatCollins63 @GabrielSterling You’re mistaken but regardless it’s not the place for government to make this decision for small businesses. If small breweries find more value in sticking with distributors, then nothing changes. But that’s their choice. I think many will choose otherwise, and consumers benefit.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@PatCollins63 @GabrielSterling Distributors also can exercise a lot of control over the alcohol brands that reach consumers through retailers. Eliminating them can give small breweries that lack market power greater access to consumers. That means greater choice and competition for consumers.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@PatCollins63 @GabrielSterling You’ve got the economics wrong. Some small breweries might choose to continue to rely on distributors because they find it cost-effective. Others would not. Eliminating the distributor would reduce cost for the consumer. Distributors do not distribute alcohol for free.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@PatCollins63 @GabrielSterling Let breweries make that decision for themselves. Those that need distributors will choose to use them. Those that don’t, will be free to avoid them. And the ensuing competition for distributors would benefit market participants, including consumers.

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

Facts

[David Cross @Cross_Examine]

@CrialKilru Charleston overrated? Must be talking about WV….