On TikTok. Olivia Nowak, Henry Nowak’s sister has shared Robert Jenrick’s speech asking Shabana Mahmood if “white lives matter just as much as everyone else’s?”
Peston does not speak for the Nowak family.
Olivia wants answers. We all want answers.
The Conservative Party lapped up the Black Lives Matter bullshit & allowed woke identity politics into every national institution including themselves. Now they say we shouldn’t have identity politics! What a bunch of rancid hypocrites…
Reporting restrictions lifted.
15 men jailed for raping a girl as young as 14 in Bradford.
Jameel Ahmed committed 4 rapes, yet could leave prison in a little over 5 years.
Sentences for rape gang perpetrators are routinely pathetically short.
Britain is broken.
The family of Rhiannon Whyte, who was stabbed to death by an illegal migrant with a screwdriver, have called for all illegal migration to end. They say Keir Starmer is responsible for the death of their loved one.
Why hasn't Starmer et al respected THEIR wishes?
@Red_Wedge_@mikegardner_wb Yes my ‘95%’ was illustrative of a more general point, that it is possible for a tax to simultaneously be highly distortive and immoral, and also raise minimal revenue. What a shame it’s gone over your head
@Red_Wedge_@mikegardner_wb Behold, a retard.
If I tax you at 95%, that will raise essentially no meaningful revenue for the state. It will, however, strongly discourage you from working and probably feel somewhat targeted.
Completely unacceptable. Nigel Farage said "pure cold rage" and the BBC decided to report it as "white cold rage".
This is why fewer and fewer people trust the BBC. They created BBC Verify to counter misinformation, but they are the biggest culprits of misinformation.
@nazirafzal The murder of HN is multiple orders of magnitude worse than GF, as evidenced by the fact that the regime outriders such as yourself are working overtime to sell the approved propaganda lines on it
You’ll notice there is no look-back celebration or remembrance of this or virtually any of the other great moral victories from that era. It’s all been memory holed, a will-o'-the-wisp dimming out in the far distance.
There's a common thread that runs through the way police officers arrested Henry Nowak when his killer invoked "racism", the domestic propaganda unit wheeled out after terror attacks, the attempts to enforce Islamic blasphemy law, the cover-up of the grooming gangs, the clamp down on free speech, and it runs something like this:
The revealed preference for Britain's establishment is for unprecedented levels of migration. The repeatedly revealed preference of the population is for massive reductions in this number. Migration has been pushed on this country against its will.
The result is friction. Friction between people, friction between groups, increasingly sectarian politics as people begin to see the decision of 'who governs' as an existential one. And where there's enough friction, there's fire.
The way the state handles this is to refocus itself on reducing friction, rather than upholding what the law might actually say. A low-level counter-insurgency against its own people. A crime against an individual is unfortunate; a crime against a group is intolerable. Imperial style policing, brought home.
The difference that gives rise to the 'two-tier' element is the size of the groups involved. The 2010 and 2024 riots showed that the state would struggle to deal with any large scale disorder; by definition, any significant dissent from the majority would give rise to this disorder.
The way that the state has chosen to handle this is to treat minority groups with a certain deference and lenience, making "small" concessions with relatively limited impact that buy a degree of peace, and to treat the majority with utter ruthlessness. The Harehills riot saw the police retreat; the Southport riots less than two weeks later saw maximal deployment of state capacity and a "shared understanding" that the courts would do the bidding of Government with quick, tough sentences. This is not "policing by consent" in the old Peelian model. That was not "the public must consent to the law being enforced", but that the police would try to win the trust of the community, singular. Now there are communities, plural, with conflicting views and interests, and the result is that policing has retreated from what it sees as contested ground.
At times, the new reality is even stated bluntly. The National Police Chiefs Council states that its goal is "producing equality of policing outcomes", and that this "does not mean treating everyone 'the same' or being 'colour blind' (racial equality)".
From monitoring what you say online to reorienting policing around the management of "tensions" between groups to endless efforts to promote the idea of diversity as a good, or play down any identity-based element in incidents with a majority victim. Two-tier policing is a function of numbers. And it is by this point completely clear that the Establishment has committed to this strategy so completely that it cannot reverse it without totally discrediting itself.
A white woman criticises a brown man for defending the rights of a white man who died because police were prejudiced against him. The media is truly cooked in the UK.