@disnaix2@Bulletxyz NO migration, no 1:1. Note the deceptively innocuous "wind-down details" of this unscrupulous move, burying it under avalanche of new posts. Here it is: "For the ZEX snapshot and wind-down details, see Zeta's announcement: https://t.co/HIfEAFZw53
@disnaix2@Tristan0x NO migration. They can't say it or own it. Not EVEN for ZEX four-year stakers! Same project/team. Why not post directly here under Bullet? Becomes obvious. "For the ZEX snapshot and wind-down details, see Zeta's announcement: https://t.co/HIfEAFZw53
@FThilo@Tristan0x@Bulletxyz It's more like Zero to None, not Zero to One for ZEX holders. Let me clarify, since team and Tristian did not: NO migration, let alone 1:1. Not EVEN for ZEX stakers! Same project/team. "For the ZEX snapshot and wind-down details, see Zeta's announcement: https://t.co/HIfEAFZw53
@vektronvultyr@Tristan0x@Bulletxyz NO migration, let alone 1:1. Not EVEN for ZEX stakers! Same project/team. "For the ZEX snapshot and wind-down details, see Zeta's announcement: https://t.co/HIfEAFZw53 Go read this!
@Bulletxyz NO migration, let alone 1:1. Not EVEN for ZEX stakers! Same project/team. Why not post this directly here under Bullet? "For the ZEX snapshot and wind-down details, see Zeta's announcement: https://t.co/HIfEAFZw53 Go read this!
Huge fail on ZEX to Bullet. Article's "contemplated 1:1 migration" used as subtitle! LOL. With "this decision is final." Weak, sophomoric, opaque. Value ZEX how via Bullet? New ratio? Nada. Art of the Soft Rug Pull, folks. Cool tech. Hardworking but extremely immature and inexperienced team for an investable project. Waiting on the next promise/news to come soon ;) That's the old paradigm play from last cycle. Also, spare me the Platonic allusion of "one and many" and clean up the sophistry. Grow up. People, go read the article. Embarrassing, especially if you've publicly followed this project. Not even close to the trajectory or leadership of a HL.
Kash, have you all made super clear how these items can be shipped via the listing, too? While this is not necessarily about how to ship, or to elect to ship, but that it is clearly shippable, if you want. My son bought one and then we figured it out by going to the vendor's site and watching a youtube video. Would be great if the concept, not necessarily the full shipping process, were better indicated in the listing. I don't think such instructions would cause folks to mistakenly ship, but just ensure that it is a real asset that can be shipped, yet also stored safely in real location via digital NFT etc. It took a lot of clicks to figure this out. gadfly.sol
@baccredited@kashdhanda Jup token not needed for success of Jupiter, unless someone else knows what I donโt. Thus all new cool features wonโt move the price given the current nominal value of token. Could this change? Maybe if the token itself gets new features.
@1amtwaps@kashdhanda Absolutely. Real value vs nominal or narrative value. Old paradigm ainโt gonna fly. Jup ainโt going up simply on emotion. My speculation is that the team knows this and that they can work towards real value as they get real assets and real revenue.
Resonate with ethos. How does profitability relate to token value for the remnant? The days of nominal token value is over. Whatโs the new model apart from a narrower market for speculation? Show me the new big boy model. Elimination of competitors only does so much. I want a damn response otherwise this is just speculative bs same paradigm.
@molusol Jupiter will be great, but its token has nothing to do with its greatness. Are you suggesting that we buy Jupiter in light of this? Use Jupiter but what exactly is the value of buying the token ? PLEASE TELL ME. thank you.