šØ HOLY CRAP! THIS is the video that Minnesota leftist prosecutors charged Cam Higby with a FELONY over
He dressed as a Muslim and asked if he could vote with ZERO ID under Minnesota's "vouching" system
"Do we need ID?"
WORKER: "NOPE!" š¤Æ
HIGBY: "I have 7 other people who I live with."
And the worker says those people can be vouched for to, and "NO ID FOR ANY"
This man exposed a corrupt election system and their answer is to criminally charge him, despite NO BALLOTS BEING CAST in this case
Minnesota is becoming like a 3rd world nation. Its elections are corrupt and voters need to elect Republicans to make it stop!
š¹THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITALS KNOW. THEY HAVE KNOWN SINCE 2014. A PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGIST JUST SENT US HIS RESIGNATION LETTER. READ IT.
"To the Board of Directors, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. Effective immediately, I resign.
I have spent 19 years in pediatric oncology. I have treated 2,300 children with cancer. I have watched 814 of them die.
I am writing this letter because I cannot carry the weight of what I know for one more day.
In 2014, I was invited to a closed-door presentation at a medical conference in Geneva. The presentation was titled: 'Non-Invasive Electromagnetic Approaches to Pediatric Tumor Regression.' It was not listed in the public program.
The presenter ā whose name I will not reveal for his safety ā showed us data from 340 pediatric cancer cases treated with frequency-based therapy between 2009 and 2014:
ā 312 out of 340 children achieved complete tumor remission
ā Average treatment time: 3 sessions of 25 minutes each
ā Side effects: ZERO
ā Recurrence rate: 4%
ā Age range: 2 to 16 years old
312 children. Cured. No chemotherapy. No radiation. No hair loss. No vomiting. No organ damage. No death.
I sat in that room with 40 other pediatric oncologists. We all saw the same data. We all understood what it meant.
Then we were told:
'This technology is not approved for civilian use. Any attempt to replicate, discuss, or disseminate these findings will result in immediate termination and criminal prosecution. You are bound by the non-disclosure terms of your conference registration.'
We went home. We went back to our hospitals. We went back to injecting children with chemotherapy that we KNEW was unnecessary.
I went back to Room 4B. That's where we do pediatric chemo at my hospital. Room 4B.
I went back to holding the hands of 6-year-olds while poison dripped into their veins.
I went back to telling mothers: 'We're doing everything we can.'
We were not doing everything we could. We were doing everything we were ALLOWED to do.
Since 2014, I have personally administered chemotherapy to 847 children.
I know ā with absolute certainty ā that at least 70% of them could have been cured in 75 minutes with zero pain.
Instead, I gave them 6-18 months of chemical torture. I watched their hair fall out. I watched them vomit until they had nothing left. I watched their parents sell their homes to pay for treatment that I KNEW was inferior to technology that already existed.
I watched 214 of those children die.
214 children. Dead. Since 2014. Under my care. While I knew.
I am not asking for forgiveness. There is no forgiveness for this.
I am asking for this letter to reach every parent who has ever been told 'there's nothing more we can do.' Because that sentence is a lie. It has been a lie since at least 2014.
There IS more they can do. There is a treatment that cures pediatric cancer in 75 minutes with zero side effects. It exists. It works. 312 children proved it works.
Your doctor knows. Your hospital knows. The board of directors knows.
They chose money over your child's life. I chose my career over your child's life.
I will not choose it one more day.
To the 214 families whose children I failed:
I am sorry. I am sorry I was a coward. I am sorry I chose silence. I am sorry I let the system convince me that obedience was the same as ethics.
It is not. Obedience killed your children. My obedience killed your children.
This letter is not enough. Nothing will ever be enough. But the silence ends today."
ā Name withheld. Pediatric Oncologist. 19 years. 2,300 patients. 814 deaths. 214 preventable.
He watched 214 children die knowing the cure existed. He stayed silent for 10 years. He is not silent anymore. Neither are we.
Share this for every child who deserved 75 minutes instead of 18 months of poison.
"You reduce crime by eliminating poverty."
This is one of the greatest intellectual confusions of our century. It sounds compassionate. It feels obvious. And the moment you actually test it, it falls apart.
Let's look at the data.
First, the correlation is real. Nobody serious denies that poorer areas have more crime. In Sweden, kids from the poorest 20% of families are about 7 times more likely to be convicted of a violent crime than kids from the richest 20%.
But correlation is not causation. So Swedish researchers did something brilliant: they compared siblings. Same parents, same home, same upbringing, but different family income at different points in their childhood, because parents' income moves over time.
Result, on more than 500,000 children (Sariaslan et al., British Journal of Psychiatry, 2014): once you account for what's shared inside the family, the effect of income on violent crime goes from 7x to nothing. The hazard ratio drops to 0.95. No effect.
Finland ran the same test on 650,000 people. Same result: the income-crime link disappears when you compare siblings.
What predicts crime isn't the bank balance. It's what travels inside families.
Second test: what happens when poverty spikes for everyone at once? 2008. US unemployment doubled from 5% to nearly 10%. 15% of Americans officially poor. If poverty creates crime, crime should have exploded. Instead it fell. Year after year. Robbery, the most "economic" crime of all, dropped 10% in 2010 alone. Criminologists literally said they were stumped. Same story in the Great Depression: 25% unemployment, and crime went down in many cities.
Third test: take families out of poverty and see. The US government ran a randomized lottery called Moving to Opportunity. Thousands of families in public housing got vouchers to move to low-poverty neighborhoods. For boys, violent arrests dropped at first, property crime arrests went up, and over time the effects faded. New zip code. Same behavior.
Fourth: the claim that police don't matter. This one is just false. Chalfin et al. (American Economic Review: Insights, 2022): each additional police officer prevents about 0.1 homicides. And per capita, the lives saved are twice as many among Black victims as among white victims. The people who suffer most from "police don't matter" are the poorest neighborhoods.
So what does predict crime? The Dunedin study followed 1,000 children from birth to age 32. Self-control measured between ages 3 and 11 predicted adult criminal convictions, even after controlling for social class and IQ (Moffitt et al., PNAS, 2011). Cognitive ability matters too: across 700,000 Swedish men, lower cognitive scores at 18 track with violent convictions, and the link barely moves when you control for childhood socioeconomic status (Frisell et al., 2012).
And here's the part nobody quotes: in Dunedin, kids whose self-control improved over time did better than predicted. Behavior can change. Which means responsibility is real.
Why does this matter? Because "poverty creates crime" isn't just wrong. It's toxic.
It turns criminals into victims. The man who robbed you becomes a symptom of "the system," and you, the real victim, become a footnote in someone else's narrative.
It merges two completely different things. "You're poor, we'll help you" is one policy. "You're poor and you committed a crime, so we'll excuse you" is another. Fusing them insults the millions of poor people who work, raise their kids, and never hurt anyone. The vast majority of poor people are not criminals. That alone kills the theory.
It removes responsibility. Build a political system on "your circumstances made you do it" and you destroy the one thing that actually changes behavior: the certainty that you own your choices. Every excuse the state manufactures is an incentive.
And it feeds the state forever. If every crime is a social failure, every crime justifies a new program, a new budget, a new agency. Crime becomes the business model of bureaucracy.
The alternative is simple and old.
A lighter state that protects instead of explains. The same rules for everyone, from the projects or from a gated community. Certain, swift punishment for anyone who commits a crime. And never, ever telling someone their crime was written in their social condition.
Treating someone as responsible is respecting them. Excusing someone because they're poor is the most condescending thing you can do to them.
RFK Jr. says a loophole allowed thousands of ingredients into our food that our bodies never evolved to consume.
Now, he says HHS is closing it.
āThe reason we have so many of these bad ingredients in our food is because of a loophole called the GRAS standard, Generally Recognized As Safe.ā
āThe industry captured that, they hijacked it.ā
āThey made everything self-affirming GRAS.ā
āNo matter if you just made it in a lab and you never did any safety testing on it, it could automatically get through that loophole.ā
āThatās why we have 10,000 ingredients in our food and the Europeans only have 400 in theirs.ā
āMost of these are laboratory-created.ā
āTheyāre substances that donāt occur in nature and your body did not evolve to digest them.ā
āWeāre now closing that loophole so that the companies will have to disclose actually whatās in the food.ā
@realchefrush
This bill isn't just a compromiseā¦it's the product of real, substantive trades policymakers made to get here.
I said this many months ago: perfect can't be the enemy of goodā¦
and let's be clear: those trades weren't small. This isn't a deal Senators should be āsettling forā ā it's a deal that they should stand behind.
Senate: the world is watching and voters are watching. Now is the time to vote yes.
I find it strange how Elonās most controversial moments get amplified by the media, while the things he does that inspire people often get little to no coverage.
Where was « Peopleās MagazineĀ Ā» when Elon Musk showed personal kindness toward ordinary people (fans, kids or strangersā¦)?
1. Answered a dying teenās last questions and made her design a SpaceX mascot (Liv Perrotto, 2026)
15-year-old Liv Perrotto, who had dreamed of meeting Musk, left eight handwritten questions on her nightstand after she became too weak to take a scheduled call. After her death from cancer, commentator Glenn Beck shared them. Musk answered every question (Tesla phone? No. Diner expansion and new games? Yes. Favorite anime? Your Name. Japan? Kyoto and teamLab. Hatsune Miku and Ani/Misa? Yes). On her final request, to make her Shiba Inu āAsteroidā plush (designed as a zero-g indicator for Polaris Dawn) a SpaceX mascot, he simply wrote āOk š.ā Her mother replied: āI wish she was here to see this.ā
2. Publicly adopted a 5th-graderās marketing idea (Bria, 2017)
Nine-year-old Bria from Michigan wrote Musk a school-project letter suggesting Tesla use the homemade commercials fans already made, since the company didnāt advertise. Her dad posted it. Musk replied: āThank you for the lovely letter. That sounds like a great idea. Weāll do it!ā She also asked for a Tesla T-shirt.
3. Covered the full repair bill for a stranger who used his Tesla to save a life (Manfred Kick, 2017)
German Tesla owner Manfred Kick saw an unconscious stroke victimās Volkswagen swerving on the Autobahn. He pulled in front of it, let the other car hit his bumper, and braked both vehicles to a stop, saving the driverās life at the cost of damage to his own Model S. Musk tweeted congratulations and announced Tesla would cover all repairs, free and expedited. The local Tesla Germany head personally picked up the car.
4. Shared a struggling womanās letter, she said it stopped her from taking her life (Johnna Sabri, 2018)
Johnna Sabri wrote an open letter about how Muskās persistence inspired her after her nonprofit failed and her life fell apart. Musk shared it with his millions of followers on Memorial Day. Sales of her handmade jewelry exploded. When he later accepted a small space-rock pendant she wanted to give him, she publicly said the timing and gesture pulled her back from suicide. Musk later posted a quote about hidden kindness.
5. Funded clean-water fountains in Flint schools after a young activist asked (Mari Copeny / Little Miss Flint, 2018)
After 11-year-old activist Mari Copeny (āLittle Miss Flintā) and others highlighted the ongoing water crisis, the Musk Foundation donated about $480,000 for UV-filtered drinking fountains in all Flint schools (plus later funds for student laptops). Musk had publicly committed to helping houses with contaminated water above FDA levels. The fountains were eventually installed so kids could drink from school fountains again.
6. Kept a promise to hug a YouTuber because two kids at the World Cup asked him to (Fidias, 2022ā2023)
Cypriot YouTuber Fidias Panayiotou camped outside Twitter/SpaceX offices for months hoping for a hug. At the 2022 World Cup in Qatar, two young boys asked Musk to hug āthe guy who keeps trying to hug you in San Francisco.ā Musk checked that they were sure, then tweeted āWill do it.ā He later hugged Fidias at Twitter HQ on National Hugging Day.
7. Stopped to sign a hat and take a selfie with a child who called out from the crowd
In a widely circulated video, a young fan called out during an event. Musk paused, brought the boy up, signed his hat and toy rocket, knelt to the childās level, and posed for photos. Musk later quoted the clip with the comment āGreat kid.ā
Small gestures that meant the world to one family to support that helped entire communities⦠these are moments that reached and touched many ordinary people at once.
Sadly, « Peopleās MagazineĀ Ā» did not cover any of those 7 inspiringā stories.
HOLY COW
This needs to break the Internet.
@JamesOKeefeIII went to Alaska during the primary on August 18th
& Election Day Workers were ready to hand him Brian Murkowskiās ballot!
Brian Murkowski is the bother of Senator Lisa Murkowski.
Yes, the same Senator AGAINST the SAVE America Act ā who wonāt support photo voter ID & proof of citizenship to vote.
You canāt make this up!
If you live in Alaska, please share this with everyone you know & ask them to peacefully call, email, & contact Senator Murkowskiās office.
Please also make a plan to vote ā YES to Ballot Measure 2 to DEFEAT Ranked Choice Voting this November.
This is a massive, earth-shattering story.
Our elections arenāt secure & the Senate is doing nothing about it.
Imagine this: you get paid by our tax dollars and you donāt even show up to do your job when it involves our tax dollars being stolen.
Wtf are these people doing in office if they donāt even care about our money being stolen and wasted? They are simply working against us.
If you support what we are building at Datachain Foundation, this is the moment to show it. We just submitted the network, the ecosystem token (DC FAT) and the Dex for validation to @coingecko and @CoinMarketCap.
We need your help to pass this gap. to receive better appreciation of our work than:
"Efforts to assess interest and engagement, considering factors such as liquidity, volume, and social media sentiment, indicate a lack of organic attention for the project. We kindly request resubmission in 14 days or once the project has gained substantial traction".
Like vote, trade, speak, share like there is no tomorrow.
Everyone talks about tokenizing the world.
But moving RWAs on-chain is definitely about much more than issuing a token.
It requires infrastructure most blockchains were never designed to provide.
Algorand was! š§µ
USAID and other shady leftist charities used real suffering as a human shield for leftist graft!
Almost 57% of USAID money to Haiti was...spent inside the DC Beltway.
Just 2% made it to Haiti.
.@SecKennedy: This is "the 2nd largest amount ever charged in a single healthcare fraud operation."
"Every fraudulent dollar diverted into a criminal scheme is a dollar unavailable for patient care, for medical innovation, or for services for vulnerable Americans."
Sheryl. Your article exemplifies the biased reporting we have come to expect from you and @nytimes. It was unfair, inimical, and inaccurate. All one needs to refute your argument is to glance at my publicly available calendar and to review my unprecedented list of accomplishments on a wide range of issues, all of which I drove. You evidently never undertook these foundational due diligences. Why let facts obscure a good story?
You fault me for missing a couple of monthly counselor meetings. However, I meet one-on-one with my counselors every day to decide policy and strategy. We schedule the monthly meetings to give the divisions a chance to keep each other informed about HHS-wide policies with which Iām already intimately familiar. Had you read my calendar, you would have seen that I have back-to-back meetings all day, every day, with both career and political staff, with my counselors and with outside stakeholders, interspersed with press conferences and other policy announcements.
I am knowledgeable and active on every issue in every division of my department, and I always make the final decisions. I meet with the principals at FDA, NIH, CDC, and my senior counselor every morning, something, Iām told, is unprecedented in HHS history. I try to get out of the office between 4:30 and 6:00 PM, so that I can spend three hours, in quiet, responding to emails. I normally work until 11 PM every night, mostly on phone calls to staff.
In order to prove your preconceived case for my disengagement, you quote anonymous employees, some of whom I fired or who quit to avoid being fired. You also deceptively quote HHS employees without identifying whether they were among those I fired, thereby depriving your readers of the opportunity to make an independent judgment about their credibility.
I came into this job to change the culture of a broken agency that has presided over the worst decline in public health in American history. Of course I fired peopleālots of them! It's an easy task for even the laziest journalist, to comb that flotsam and jetsam for malevolence toward the Trump administration. And of course, this species of journalist will always be able to find disgruntled individuals among the 70,000 employees of the Department from whom to cherry pick "facts" to flesh out a preordained hit piece. All that is required for this brand of journalism is the ethical elasticity that you seem to have in spades. You had a preconceived thesis, and you set out to prove it. This is a widely accepted technique in journalism today, but I grew up in an era when it would not have been tolerated by the New York Times.
Ultimately, God puts us all on this earth to search for existential truths. I've tried to instill this mission at HHS by implementing gold standard research to end the regime of politicized science that COVID exposed to the American public. There was a time that journalists were proud to be the fearless and uncompromising champions of truth. Standards have devolved, and journalism is dead. The Times now employs propagandists. Your capitulation to partisanship further compounds your journalistic challenges; since we all are aware of your predictable bias, we at HHS are unwilling to talk to you about the topics that are important. The fact that you have minimal access to decision makers leaves you covering trivia and relying on your own capacity for invention.
Btw. When I took this job, the building was empty. About 90% of the employees were not coming to work. I changed that, but your newspaper never covers my reforms. Nor did you cover the fact that my predecessor almost never showed up for work here during his four years in office. When we came in, there were still artifacts from the first Trump administration in many of our office drawers because no one showed up for work during the Biden years. Just as Rochelle Walensky spent her entire term as CDC Director in Cambridge, Xavier Becerra reportedly spent most of his term as HHS Secretary in California. (I live in California, but Iāve only been there once in fifteen months).
His only notable accomplishments here were losing 300,000 children, referred to HHS for custody and care, to human traffickers and drug runners, encouraging transgender surgeries, and disabling the entire program-integrity apparatus, allowing hundreds of billions of dollars of theft from my agency. I have set out to find the children Becerra lost. He is now the front-runner for the governor of California. These are not invented stories; they are genuine scandals that the Times will never cover, presumably, because the malefactors are Democrats.
Finally, you criticize me for spending time with the Indian tribes in Alaska. I consider that part of my job. I run the Indian Health Services, and Iāve had unprecedented success in transforming IHS from a backwater to a top priority for this department. Iāve made more trips to Indian country and to Indian health clinics and hospitals than any HHS secretary in history, and Iāve brought Indians into high positions on the sixth floor for the first time in agency history. This is another success story that the Times will never cover.
The DOJ's deadline to charge Fauci for lying under oath about funding gain-of-function research in Wuhan is in 6 days. We canāt allow the statute of limitations to run out. He MUST be charged!
Agree? RT.