The law protects the asshole kid, but it also protects the man at the same time. I wish he would have went full Bill Burr on him and made him cry, but I know he was worried about his job.
It’s society’s job to punish in these cases, not the government. I hope wherever he is, his entire community is disgusted and fully ostracizing him. I know the digital world sure is.
This is true. Fascism, socialism, and communism are all in the same collectivism basket on the left. People are just using the outdated single axis, left vs right graph that oversimplifies all of politics onto a single line. It’s inaccurate. Fascism is socialism/communism, but with a façade. Socialism/communism will straight up take your house from you and divide it into apartments for strangers. Fascism allows your name to stay on the title, but controls who gets to live there, whether they have to pay you anything, how much, and if you are allowed to live there too, which basically means it isn’t your house anymore.
A more accurate political spectrum graph would have economic freedom on its own axis. Should the markets be controlled by the gov or by the citizens? Should you and your family be allowed to own/live in a private house, or should the gov be allowed to move a couple other families in there with you?
A more accurate political graph would also include an axis for how much the government controls you. Outside of owning the house, should you be allowed to paint it the color you want or have friends over? Can you cook whatever you want for dinner?
Having 2 separate axes for economic and personal freedoms on a single graph makes it a 4 quadrant graph called Nolan’s chart. It’s more modern and accurate than the single axis graph, and is much easier to plot and understand.
Ultimately, I think this graph should also have a third axis for the government itself. Should our decisions be made by the many or by the few? Whose opinion matters? Should you decide the color of your house or should a coven of Karen’s? This would make it much more accurate, but would create a 3D graph, which would be tougher for most to draw/understand.
@grok@jeffb198712@AmericaPapaBear Both charts combined into a 3-axis chart! Economic freedom, personal freedom, and democracy. Gives an even more accurate idea of where each party belongs, but isn’t as easy to read/draw compared to a single or double axis graph.
@grok@jeffb198712@AmericaPapaBear@grok Would you say the single (right vs left) economic axis line is outdated and inaccurate compared to multi axis charts?
@grok@jeffb198712@AmericaPapaBear@grok Let’s adjust Nolan’s chart a bit. X-axis can be freedom, y-axis can be concentration of power, who decides those freedoms.
This isn’t some easy thing to do. The left are using every tool they can to fight back. They NEED these foreigners to further their plan. They are releasing illegals from custody, they are using judges to block orders, they are flat out ignoring process, laws, Supreme Court decisions, etc to continue to do as they please. This deportation issue is a multi facet problem that started from within our own country and government.
This is what we (the non globalists) are up against, from their own mouths and documents. They are using lawfare and third world immigration to destroy governments across the globe and remake them as they see fit.
🚨🚨 THE ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK / THE DEMOCRACY FILES: A PRIMER 🚨
I will be using this thread to track all drops, so bookmark it.
I spent most of yesterday backing everything (now 312 gigabytes) up in various sources and getting the materials out to others. I also produced an AI video (below) to explain the whole thing to others are not on 𝕏 - feel free to distribute.
Here's the primer:
USAID, the foreign aid agency, had a democracy office. Inside the agency, it was called DRG.
Officially, DRG administered "democracy assistance." They'd go inside countries they thought were sliding into authoritarianism and help the opposition there. That assistance included election monitoring, judicary support, independent media, and civil society building.
You may have heard the term "color revolution." The model comes from Serbia in 2000, where trained student activists brought down Milosevic with the help of Western governments, after sustained protests. With the help of USAID's democracy office, this model was implemented in many other countries to topple governments: Georgia's "Rose Revolution" in 2003, Ukraine's "Orange Revolution" in 2004, and many more.
Then last year, DOGE shut down USAID. But the USAID democracy office didn't stop. They formed a group called the Democracy Renewal Group, the same initials as their office (USAID Democracy, Human Rights, Governance). Their goal: apply their own playbook to the United States itself.
This goal became a plan, called Renew American Democracy (RAD). It invoked the "4 B's" framework. Block - use lawfare and protests to make life harder for the Trump administration. Bridge & Belong - control dialogue and win people over. The final and most important B is Build. Build means redesigning the American government itself, and the crisis is the opening.
In their own words:
"We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment." - Danielle Reiff, DRG lead.
Calls show DRG working alongside DSA on ideas of creating a different government, one that does away with the Constitution itself.
DRG does not run the Block operations. They hand it to UDA, the United Democracy Alliance. One organizer calls it a "huge galaxy": lawsuits, street protests, non-cooperation. They list No Kings, Indivisible, MoveOn, 50501, and many other mega-activist NGOs among their members.
Another organizer calls UDA Erica Chenoweth's project. Chenoweth is the Harvard professor behind the three-and-half-percent rule of regime change: get that share of a country's populace onto the streets, and historically, the movement wins.
The UDA is very "hush-hush." They have no website, no roster, no filings.
Then come the red lines: things the Trump administration could do, such as calling the Insurrection Act on protesters, that would mean that the federal government, in their words, "crosses the threshold into illegitimacy." Nobody voted on those lines. There was no public debate. These red lines were developed within secretive working groups, and in a paper addressed to governors and staff.
In the words of Reiff/DRG:
"So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everyone's already pre-organized. And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, oh, you guys have the day after tomorrow plan."
Cross a line, and the paper's options include states refusing to lend their resources to federal officials, and governors convening what it calls a "Third Continential Congress."
Running the UDA's Insurrection Act working group: Rear Admiral Mike Smith (RET) of National Security Leaders of America (NSL4A). NSL4A is also credited with operationalizing UDA, the blocking operations. NSL4A consists of about 1,600 ex-officers, spies, diplomats. They're turning red lines into indicators and running a situation room to monitor them throughout the midterms and beyond.
The NSL4A's lawyers told them to stop recording meetings in case of subpoenas. But the rest of the network continued to record. DRG works in conjunction with Renew to Thrive (R2T), which ended up accidentally publishing 400+ calls and thousands of documents. These calls and documents were never meant for our eyes, but it's them, on tape.
Thousands of NGOs and billions of dollars are involved in this endeavor. Most of them believe they're saving democracy. The problem is that people who spent their careers deciding when other countries' governments had lost their legitimacy wrote that test for ours, in private, and planned for what comes after.
Who decides when your government is legitimate?
Oh, I have been researching. These are legit questions I haven’t found answers to. Please help me with my questions tomorrow. I genuinely want to know why Muslims have such a high crime rate compared to all the other religions. It doesn’t make sense for something I keep hearing is the religion of peace. What makes it different?
Says the person who is trying to misinterpret me!! I’m just trying to understand. SOMEBODY needs to fix Muslim culture. Idk who, but obviously they aren’t doing it. Seems to me the changes they make only make things worse. I’m wondering why.
What’s the difference between the peaceful Muslims you’ve met and the others? Why is it that the Quran specifically says to do violent things, but some people don’t follow it?
But you said these awful parts aren’t Islamic teachings, these are things they made up on their own. If they can invent laws that allow murder, why can’t they change them? If they are capable of inventing their own laws and are capable of following those laws, it seems to me they don’t need Islam. They can just keep inventing their own laws.
The real question is why can’t they invent something better for women? Why do they have to be so violent? Is that the low IQ from all the inbreeding? I agree, it does seem like a cesspool.
The point we are discussing is women’s rights. You say don't blame the religion, blame the people deviating from its teachings. Which teaching? Even if I ignore all the later, non-Muhammad written Hadiths, 4:24 in the Quran permits raping female captives, 4:34 prescribes beating wives, 2:282 says women's testimony only counts as half that of a men, and 9:5 commands killing polytheists, half of which are women.
As a woman, it still doesn’t sound like people I’d want to invite into my home.