@mikecavmusic Put every last one of them in jail for life, seize 100% of their fradulent assets. They are unAmerican traitors who sold out other Americans for a buck.
I'm somewhere in the middle. My family has such a hard time buying Christmas gifts for me I threw them a bone and said to get the NS2 and Zelda + Starfox for me. I didn't realize at the time that Zelda game out early November... so...
I have them, it's in a closet somewhere waiting arbitrarily for another month and a half. ๐ญ
I think I didn't like it because its not Resident Evil. It's a horror art project (it's not bad) with the Resident Evil title slapped on it.
It's clear the creator didn't play the source material because instead of getting Nemesis chasing the player you get a zombie tumbleweed. Do you remember the zombie tumbleweeds from Resident Evil 2 or 3? or any of the creatures he showed?
The OG Resident Evil movie didn't have the characters either, but it definitely felt a lot more like Resident Evil than this. The dogs align better and actually has a special infected eg: licker where I think his creatures are inspired by the later games, not the RE2/RE3 ones. This new movie is just a bait and switch.
The new @ResidentEvil has no business calling itself Resident Evil. It is not that at all. If you watch it expecting to get Resident Evil, prepare to be highly disappointed.
Its not a bad film, but its Resident Evil in title only. Zach Cregger should have just made his own horror series and left the words Resident Evil off the project.
He claims to have cared about the franchise and reviewed the source material... but after watching, it feels like that must be a blatant lie. You may have looked at the concept art, but clearly you haven't actually gone through any of the games, or your not a fan of them.
Resident Evil (2002) did a better job at special infected, eg: dogs, licker and while ultimately a flawed attempt that went off the rails pretty bad by the last movie still understood and did a better job with making something that feels like Resident Evil.
Whatever Zach Cregger made is not Resident Evil. To me its a great art piece, I love the cinematography throughout, the film really wasn't bad. Not really my thing though, and not something I would go out of my way to see unless you slapped a brand name on it to trick me into watching it. And that's how I feel, y'all slapped Resident Evil on this to trick me into watching your horror/art project.
Play Resident Evil 2 & 3 and tell me what creature this is? Cause this zombie tumbleweed is what you get chasing the main character throughout instead of Nemesis.
@Butthead_6969@ImYorker93 I left Michigan long ago, I probably don't need to do anything myself to be honest. I'm pretty sure a reckoning is underway whether I'm a part of it or not. I have faith that the foreign terrorists there and in the rest of the country will get their due.
@BrendanCarrFCC This is just bullshit. By the end of next year they'll push it to SI (AI). While I'm for the jobs leaving foreign countries and 'coming back here', it's a moot point since the death of the jobs here is underway. @ATT knows this too, so don't give them too much credit.
Movies like Remember Me, Seven Pounds, The Prestige, The Illusionist, Secret Life of Walter Mitty, are all great movies.
But so is a movie like Tremors, I watched that last night for 1st time in 20 years and that movie is a masterpiece. Perfect balance of everything.
Films don't need to fit into some perfect box to be an amazing work of art, adventure or both. The experience and feeling while watching & after viewing a film the 1st, or even a 2nd+ time is what matters.
Beauty is truly in the eye of the beholder. I saw Pirates of the Caribbean Curse of the Black Pearl three times in theaters when it came out, its master work but so are films like Good Will Hunting.
@Grimkaizer I for one prefer dramatic acting over naturalistic or realistic acting. Makes the unreality of film more entertaining; a Schwarzenegger action film is more amusing and enjoyable than any """art""" film or "based on a true story" award winner.
Blind. They don't glorify him. They simply understand him. Anakin is relatable because the generation coming up now is in a similar position to him.
They're told they're a force for change while also being spoken down to and demeaned by their elders. Theyre also told they're a problem by those elders who have allowed culture to decay for decades. On top of that, emotions like love become harder and harder to express due to the decline in social interaction. Anakin wasn't allowed to love. Anakin wasn't socialized. Anakin was told he was a problem and spoken to like he was untrustworthy while also being told he's the best guy they've got. I dont think most people want to be Anakin Skywalker. But I do think many young men relate to him and that's a cultural failure. Not their failure.