Some wonder why Maga is disappointed with Amy Coney Barrett👩⚖️⚖️
Here's why:
She lied to Trump.
She lied to the Senate confirmation committee.
She lied to Republicans.
She lied to Maga.
She lied to the American people.
Despite her assurances & testimony, she was no conservative—she was & is a liberal wolf in sheep's clothing.
SHAME on her.
Europe lives rent free in my head because it keeps proving the same point.
The postwar love affair with American-style freedom may have been the exception, not the rule.
This is still a continent shaped by emperors, kings, ministries, censors, licenses, borders drawn by blood, and bureaucrats who instinctively believe liberty is something to be managed.
The French Revolution terrified Europe because it was not merely a rebellion. It was self-government turned contagious. And it was treated like a contagion.
The old monarchies understood exactly what was at stake. If ordinary people could claim sovereignty once, they might do it everywhere.
That is the European reflex I cannot stop noticing.
When freedom appears, they study it first as a disease.
Then they attack it like an immune system attacks a virus.
The more I study this, the more I come to the conclusion that America is totally unique and cannot be replicated anywhere, ever.
This place is the last stand of western civilization.
🚨 CORRUPT CHIEF JUSTICE EXPOSED: John Roberts’ wife Jane made $10,323,842.70 in commissions from Big Law firms arguing cases before HIS Supreme Court!
Roberts listed it as “salary” to hide it.
He NEVER recused from 500+ cases when he had a HUGE FINANCIAL & FAMILY CONFLICT OF INTEREST!
A FORMAL disbarment complaint was filed April 2026!
This guy “saved” Obamacare and sold out conservatives for YEARS!
WHY DON'T HOUSE REPUBLICANS IMPEACH JOHN ROBERTS IMMEDIATELY?
@Jim_Jordan
President Trump should end all immigration in the name of national security.
He has the authority to do it without Congress.
Per the Immigration and Nationality Act:
“Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
Section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) (8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)):
During @DOGE, I watched legacy media and left-wing “journalists” publish falsehoods for clicks. @NickKristof and The New York Times are doing the same now.
Their biased reporting shows a clear disdain for the American people, President Trump, and @elonmusk.
Nick cites two widely critiqued studies in his USAID piece:
• One relies on projections with zero verified mortality data, just models.
• The other attributes 92 million prevented deaths to USAID alone, more than the entire global improvement in that period.
These much-critiqued studies overstate the impact and lack real-world death counts. Where is the New York Times fact checker?
Many of America’s wealthiest counties sit right outside Washington, DC. McLean and Loudoun County, VA, consistently rank in the top 10. This is all thanks to the foreign aid contracting industry. The DC housing market still hasn’t recovered.
Deloitte in DC routinely kept over 80% of contract value on USAID work. Only about 10%—some say as low as 6%—typically reached the recipient.
On the specific people Kristof highlights:
• Jibia from Uganda who died from malaria: During Kristof’s reporting period, the President’s Malaria Initiative was funded at its full $805 million. The Global Fund and the Ugandan government fund malaria programs. Why is Kristof so sure it was USAID funding when none was cut?
• Yamah from Liberia: The UN, EU, and Liberian government all fund health systems and emergency care. Is he really sure it was USAID? Unlikely he traced this program from funding to the field.
Kristof’s reporting reads as if the conclusion was decided in advance. He uses tragic anecdotes without naming specific programs, full funding context, or alternative donor sources.
This begs the question: Where is the New York Times Standards Desk?
They would rather print false information than do any due diligence.
@KatieMiller@DOGE@NickKristof@elonmusk Africa had an average of 600,000 Malaria deaths per year for the last decade with USAID. How can you tell the one extra death ? AIDS deaths are about 400,000. Famine deaths caused by war and or drought vary widely per year.
The greatest trick in this birthright citizenship fight is pretending the 14th Amendment was always meant to do what the modern Left wants it to do now.
It wasn’t.
They took a Reconstruction promise and repurposed it into an immigration loophole. They took a constitutional repair written to overturn the moral stain of Dred Scott and turned it into a paperwork machine for anyone who can touch American soil at the right time.
That is not interpretation.
That is theft.
The 14th Amendment was written to secure citizenship for people who already belonged here, people who had been degraded by law, denied dignity, and told they could never be full Americans in the only country they had ever known.
Clarence Thomas is pointing to that original moral weight and saying: this clause meant something serious.
The Court’s version drains that seriousness out of it.
Under their logic, citizenship is not about allegiance. Not about home. Not about membership. Not about being part of the American people. It is just a legal coupon attached to geography.
Born here? Congratulations. Nationhood dispensed.
That cheapens citizenship.
It cheapens the people the 14th Amendment was written to protect. It cheapens the country. It cheapens the idea that citizenship carries obligations, loyalty, and belonging.
The Left loves invoking history until history gets in the way of the loophole.
Thomas did not attack the 14th Amendment.
He defended it from being hijacked, flattened, and sold back to the country as a border policy the framers of Reconstruction never wrote.
(article below)
The dumbest thing I've heard is that a baby deserves to be an American citizen if that baby's parents broke the law, illegally entered our country and had a baby here. That is so obviously idiotic. paraphrasing @mattvanswol
Meet the dumbest, or most conniving, person in the nation: US Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett
Communism always goes the same way. They smile & promise you the world. Free this, free that, abundance for all! How? Don't ask!
Then they get into power, and the rationing begins. First a smiley ask. Then a demand. Then a bullet. "You used too much energy, comrade"
The Supreme Court today: If you break the law, America will reward you and your offspring indefinitely.
Arguably the worst decision in the entire history of the Court. It’s that bad.
If your rule of constitutional interpretation leads you to conclude your nation must destroy itself then your rule of constitutional interpretation is wrong.