@highbrow_nobrow And the taxpayers are footing the bill...
MAGA retarded fucks: "Yay! Another win for us. Trump is playing 4D chess."
Fucking stupid-ass fuckers!
@Eric_Schmitt@JDVance The only way JD Vance will become president is if AOC, Kamala Harris, and Newsom run against him. However, if @CaptMarkKelly Kelly or even @SenatorSlotkin runs against JD Vance, both would have a better chance of winning.
@elonmusk Future with love? I guess you’ve forgotten how you mocked federal employees and carried a chainsaw around as if it were fun to ruin people’s livelihoods.
@USEagleEye@WhoRfk36331@costplusdrugs Oh, they gave you a break from sucking their dicks. Thin skinned? I am not a liberal and not in a MAGA cult either. Try again. You're a mega MAGA retarded fuck! 🤣😂🤣
@USEagleEye@WhoRfk36331@costplusdrugs FYI: I asked about possible incentives, concessions, and hidden costs behind the pricing structure, and instead of addressing that, you pivoted to “basic economics” and a personal jab. Competition lowering prices doesn’t answer the question I asked. MEGA MAGA DUMBASS! 😂
@DR_427@SumSol44@EricLDaugh@jeff76930614 you already paid for it. Being okay with that without asking how much these companies are really making off the arrangement is exactly how taxpayers keep getting played.
@DR_427@SumSol44@EricLDaugh@jeff76930614 Nobody's against cheaper drugs. The problem is when the government spends taxpayer money building a platform, hands out priority FDA reviews and tariff exemptions to pharma companies, and then calls it a deal because you save $15 on insulin. You're not getting a discount.
@WhoRfk36331@costplusdrugs The president gets political credit. And taxpayers funded the marketing campaign for all of it.
You save $15 on insulin. Pharma gets regulatory favors worth billions. But sure, celebrate the coupon.
@WhoRfk36331@costplusdrugs The government spent taxpayer money building a website that aggregates private company coupons, slaps a presidential brand on it, and calls it a healthcare breakthrough. The companies get massive free exposure, priority FDA reviews, and tariff exemptions.
@WhoRfk36331@costplusdrugs It's a federal government website, built and operated with government resources, which means taxpayer money. https://t.co/aahrbEn0hP
@costplusdrugs Now he gets something he couldn't get on his own . A massive government-driven traffic, credibility from a federal endorsement, and potentially a revenue stream backed by public money. This is not about being some selfless crusader.
@WhoRfk36331@costplusdrugs Guess who’s paying for it? Taxpayers. Charge the government more than triple, then make it look like consumers are getting a deal when they already paid for it through taxes.
@ryan466381@EricLDaugh He's been trying for years, yes. Now he gets something he couldn't get on his own. A massive government-driven traffic, credibility from a federal endorsement, and a guaranteed revenue stream backed by public money. Taxpayers are paying for it and he makes more money.
@ryan466381@EricLDaugh We’ve seen government programs create incentives where private companies profit heavily because taxpayers ultimately fund the system. Charge triple, make it look like consumers are paying less, when in reality taxpayers already paid for it.
@SumSol44@EricLDaugh@jeff76930614 Guess who pays when government-backed programs and private companies team up: taxpayers. I wouldn’t be surprised if he charges huge amounts for the drugs and then make it look like consumers are paying less, when taxpayers already covered the cost somewhere along the line.
@EricLDaugh Low price? Taxpayers will be paying for it, ass. Funny how the guy who spent years attacking Trump suddenly shows up for a ‘special partnership’ once there’s business upside involved. It's a government-backed program. Cuban doesn't care about you.