I'm starting to buy back in here going long and will continue to dca while BTC still trades below $83k. Closed out a majority of my SOL short at a loss and will get rid of the short completely and flip long. Names I like and am long:
$BTC $ETH $HYPE $SOL $AVAX
NFA DYODD
GL!
The past decade has really made me reassess the nature of WW1 & 2.
What has Russia actually done to increase hostility with the West? Well, they blew up Nordstream, right? Nope. That was a CIA/Ukraine operation blamed on Russia. But they installed Trump in 2016, right? Nope. That was a CIA/FBI operation to hand the WH to Hillary Clinton. But they invaded Ukraine, right? Well, yeah. After decades of NATO expansion and provocations like Maidan, they finally did something about it.
So, in short, Russia did basically nothing to the West. And yet the West is ramping up for direct war against Russia all across Europe.
Does the public support it? No. Not at all.
Just as the debt supercycle hits many quadrillions a major war seems to have been created out of thin air.
So you might want to reconsider your historical understandings of world wars and recognize that you're currently living thru the latest bullshit chapter.
This story is fascinating and is easily one of the most important things happening at the intersection of AI and politics right now. It's critical everyone understands the situation because this is just the beginning of the AI infowars and psyops
Jacob Coxon, a relatively unknown AI researcher, gives the WSJ an exclusive story about his resignation from Anthropic and his concerns about AI
Twenty minutes after the WSJ story drops, Jacob posts on X about how he's concerned that AI could kill us all in a few years. This post now has over 149M views. For reference, Ilya Sutskever (a very well known AI name) left OpenAI in 2024 and his announcement post has fewer than 6M views as of today
Bear in mind, Jacob Coxon's X account had no prior posting activity public, but it is immediately reposted and boosted by numerous AI-doomer policy advocacy nonprofits funded by the same donor (Jaan Tallinn) who just happens to be one of the leading investors in Anthropic
We find out Jacob Coxon, who worked at Anthropic for only a few weeks, worked for a left-wing political advocacy group in 2021 (Newspeak). This organization is a British NGO with ties to hacking democracy, Hillary Clinton, prison abolition and extinction rebellion
Many major Democrat politicians are now using Jacob's X post to fear monger the public into voting to regulate AI. It just so happens Bernie Sanders has a bill already written to ban artificial superintelligence (ASI) and to create a new federal agency to protect the public from the dangers of AI. This bill was announced just one week ago on September 3rd
It would also place a temporary pause on "advanced AI" until a new federal regulator exists and has issued safety rules and a model-review process
Elon then points out how none of this feels organic, and Jacob decides to take a shot at him for firing some xAI researchers
Meanwhile, we know Anthropic has publicly asked the government to audit and block frontier models and Anthropic has run a state-by-state campaign for rules that only large AI labs trigger, meaning the rules are structured around barriers only frontier labs can easily clear (limiting competition)
There is extensive Anthropic personnel and financial overlap with the groups that wrote the Biden-era AI policies. It is well known information you can seek out if you want the detail
This all seemingly comes back to regulatory capture and political motives. None of this feels natural. Jacob can say these are his real views all he wants, and they may be, but there is clearly far more to the story
The most active Democratic stock trader in the House wants you to know he supports banning congressional stock trading.
Meet Ro Khanna.
Khanna built a national profile pushing to ban individual stock trading by members of Congress. He teamed up with Bernie Sanders on a billionaire tax. The populist brand is the whole point.
His household runs the busiest book of any House Democrat. Over $600M in volume across 37,172 trades since 2020, per Quiver Quantitative.
From Jan 2024 to April 2026, trades tied to him beat the S&P 500 by 112%, per ProCap Insights. Pelosi cleared 38.5% over the same window.
His wife's trust bought Nvidia in Feb 2024 for a 143% gain, while he sat on the subcommittee overseeing defense AI procurement (NY Post). A 2022 NYT investigation flagged 149 potential conflicts in his trades.
His answer never changes. The trades are his wife's, held in a trust, he controls none of it. It is legal and it is disclosed. It is also exactly what he says should be banned.
Ro is worth $200m and has $600m in trade volume so far during his time as a congressman
He is a liar, hypocrite, insider trader, and fraudster
If he wants to fund these causes, he should be the first to give from his private fortune
@draecomino James this is the part that confuses me because yes it’s advertised as such. But then third party individuals like SemiAnalysis suggests otherwise and Codex Spark being a smaller model only seems to support their claim.
Hace unas semanas, un grupo de “expertos y expertas”, financiados por Open Society (Soros), acudió a la CIDH y a la ONU a, básicamente, pedir la liberación del 100% de los pandilleros arrestados durante el régimen de excepción.
Estos videos fueron vistos por el pueblo salvadoreño, lo que generó un fuerte rechazo hacia todas las ONG, “periodistas” y políticos que apoyaron el informe. Fue un desastre de relaciones públicas para las organizaciones de supuesta defensa de los derechos humanos.
Sin embargo, al ver la reacción y ser cuestionados por la gente, su excusa fue que no defendían a terroristas, sino a supuestos inocentes.
Así que decidieron intentarlo otra vez, esta vez ante el Congreso de los Estados Unidos. El plan era presentar al Gobierno de El Salvador como un violador de derechos humanos. Sin embargo, les salió peor: cuando les preguntaron directamente si estaban de acuerdo en que la MS-13 es una organización terrorista, no pudieron responder, y luego afirmaron que, independientemente de los crímenes cometidos, ellos estaban ahí para defender los derechos de esas personas.
Vean el video. Vean claramente cómo defienden a terroristas. Vean cómo dicen que, aunque hayan cometido crímenes horribles, ellos están ahí para defender sus derechos. No lo digo yo, lo dicen ellos con sus propias palabras en el Congreso estadounidense.
Que no los engañen: no están defendiendo a supuestos inocentes, están defendiendo a terroristas. Están diciendo que la MS-13 no es una organización terrorista y que, sin importar sus delitos, ellos igual defenderán sus derechos.
Que no quede ninguna duda: lo que buscan estos supuestos “periodistas”, organizaciones de “defensa de los derechos humanos” y políticos nacionales y extranjeros que los apoyan, es la liberación de estos criminales, para que puedan volver a someter al pueblo salvadoreño a su régimen de terror y volvernos a convertir en el país más peligroso del mundo.
Pero se dispararon en el pie, otra vez.
Vean el video y juzguen ustedes mismos.