Some (critical) thoughts on the Supreme Court of Canada and the precariousness of the rule of law. You might not think that how judges dress matters, but I do! https://t.co/dRvnu6b6cQ
Our recent report, "Legal Innovation After Reform: Five Years of Data on Regulatory Change", was discussed by The Legal Intelligencer in "Revolutionizing Legal Services: Five Years in the Regulatory Sandbox".
https://t.co/3iXs1UKcKD
@jadler1969 The comments are racist trash. Not sure the speculation of the original tweet is interesting. Certainly caused the trolls to come out from under their rocks, though.
J. Kavanaugh suggests the MQD is limited to the domestic sphere. This is quite important for the tariff litigation, where challengers seek to extend the MQD to the international sphere. Without the MQD at play, the President's tariff position is significantly stronger.
What happens when states rethink legal services? Watch David Freeman Engstrom & Natalie Knowlton on Talk Justice as they unpack 5 years of reform data from AZ & UT. Legal Innovation After Reform: What worked, what didn’t, what’s next.
Watch now: https://t.co/2LpxlV1KYD
The media makes me laugh honestly 😂 low key have always enjoyed Eubanks as a commentator, always going to spin what I say and turn it into some sort of rivalry or friction 😂 I think if we were on the same panel, would be beneficial to the sport 😂 tennis is weird