Richard M. Re

Law Professor

[Richard M. Re @RichardMRe]

“The Standing Realignment,” a draft by Yoav Paz-Priel and myself.

Comments welcome! https://t.co/NSusSzNl0g

[Cass Sunstein @CassSunstein]

Needed in 2028: A constitutional mini-moment. @adamliptak @jacklgoldsmith @JonahDispatch @maggieNYT
https://t.co/8D34qOzuWj

[Howard Bashman @howappealing]

“Beyond the Purcell Principle”: Samuel Bray has this post at the “Divided Argument” Substack site. https://t.co/65uUDxbanE

[Anthony Michael Kreis, FRHistS @AnthonyMKreis]

Posting my draft of “Discovering the Historical Anglo-American Constitution.”

I trace birthright citizenship from the 1100s to the 1770s and show that the English common-law rule of natural-born subjects was always tied to territory and jurisdiction.

https://t.co/shmXgQYZI9

[Lawrence Solum @lsolum]

Cass Sunstein (Harvard) proposes seven constitutionally inspired commitments a future administration could adopt by executive order — on DOJ independence, the Fed, the pardon power, and self-dealing — as the kernel of a constitutional “mini-moment.” Highly recommended. https://t.co/CY2tjyHsn1

[Richard M. Re @RichardMRe]

New draft paper: “What is the Business of the Warren Court?” https://t.co/hdn2Jdhvay

[Jill Hasday @JillHasday]

I am delighted to report that today is publication day for my new book! In a nation whose Constitution purports to speak for “We the People,” too many of the stories that powerful Americans tell about law and society include only #WeTheMen.

@OUPLaw @OUPAcademic @SocSci

[Richard M. Re @RichardMRe]

Answer: 2001

https://t.co/g3VV8wl2jH

[Richard M. Re @RichardMRe]

“We live in extraordinary times. … In the past ten years [the Supreme Court] has produced fundamental changes in American constitutional law.”

When was this written?

[Mark Jia @MarkZJia]

Sharing here a forthcoming paper of mine entitled, "Law Power." It proposes a theory of national legal power similar to existing theories of military and economic power. Link here and abstract below. Comments highly welcome. https://t.co/K8vwYnAMPk

[Richard M. Re @RichardMRe]

“We live in extraordinary times. … In the past ten years [the Supreme Court] has produced fundamental changes in American constitutional law.”

When was this written?

[Richard M. Re @RichardMRe]

@daniel_b_rice That is some coincidence!

[Richard M. Re @RichardMRe]

“We live in extraordinary times. … In the past ten years [the Supreme Court] has produced fundamental changes in American constitutional law.”

When was this written?

[Nicholas Bagley @nicholas_bagley]

This is a super interesting paper !

[John Arnold @johnarnold]

Try to ignore any personal views for a minute...
It's nuts how abortion dominated politics & divided society for 40+ years and yet the Hobbs decision had, at least at macro level, no discernable impact and may have increased numbers by accelerating medication-assisted abortion.

[Curtis Bradley @curtisabradley]

Here's the link to my new article with Neil Siegel, “Court-Stripping, Court-Packing, and Court-Defying: Revisiting the Supreme Court’s Essential Functions.”
https://t.co/Txca2aRQdv

[Nicholas Bednar @NicholasBednar]

Happy to see my final piece on the Presidential Control of the Civil Service published with Minn. L. Rev.

https://t.co/M78zunn0YV

[Andrew Kent @andrewkent33]

Good piece, important topic

[William Baude @WilliamBaude]

Full post, co-authored with @RichardMRe, here: https://t.co/zttfc7KYh9

[Richard M. Re @RichardMRe]

The Supreme Court’s common sense problem | SCOTUSblog https://t.co/VZAFNt3Ai6

[Dr. Taraleigh Davis @tdunc17]

How often do courts actually cite Supreme Court emergency docket orders? Probably than you think. New piece over at In the Interim @SCOTUSblog
https://t.co/Zs37n2JNPE

[Ed Whelan @EdWhelanEPPC]

Outrageous abuse of power.