@LukaL53640@DCHussar There is already a territorial monopoly on force (the initiation of aggression). Anarchists by definition want no such thing to exist, nor do they want a monopoly on any system that either prosecutes or defends aggressors, or those who defend themselves against them
@LukaL53640@DCHussar In a short term form, anarchy just means no rulers. The status quo has rulers, primarily visible via the existence of governments. They all use forms of coercion at the very minimum up to outright murder. Anarchistic societies dont really exist because most people tolerate this.
@LukaL53640@3R_Throw@DCHussar The NAP effectively is making the claim that you rightfully own yourself and other people rightfully own themselves. To believe otherwise is making the claim that other people can own you and do with you what they wish, including using coercive measures