@thoughtland I curse Scottish sport. Andy Murray did well cos I wasn’t watching. Started watching the game, turned off after 10 minutes with the nerves. Took a swatch of the score and we had scored. Stayed dark until it was all over. They might not have impressed but oor fans did.
Notícies alarmants sobre una taca de petroli al riu Caquetá, cortesia de la companyia petroliera canadenca Gran Tierra Energy. Fa tres dies i no s'ha pres cap mesura visible. Aquesta és la companyia que patrocina la Fundació Barça. @FCBFundacio
I sat on the panel that adjudicated May 2 1999. The various pitch invasions that day. How would I treat what happened last week? As SPL CEO. It’s a fun exercise.
The “misdemeanour” is clear as pointed out below 👇🏻. The game ended before the whistle, due to a pitch invasion.
1/n
@DouglasBeattie4@GeorgeFoulkes But the music hadn’t stopped, that’s the entire point. It’s irrelevant what time remained to be played. In a normal world, Hearts would have kicked off to restart the game followed quickly by the final whistle.
YouTube demonetized my channel for "Inauthentic Content" on April 13th.
I've spent 8+ days tagging TeamYouTube with no response, so I'm putting everything on the record.
I run Fluffcomedy a channel I built from scratch in a niche that didn't exist before me. Every video is a manual creative process: I source realistic footage, generate AI visuals, and record my own voiceover.
I also have a dedicated editor who puts 4+ hours into every single video. This isn't just my livelihood his entire salary depends on this channel. This is original content. This is real people's work.
After the demonetization, their automated legal notice changed the reason to "Copyright Infringement." When I challenged that, their own system confirmed I have zero copyright strikes on my account.
Three different answers. Zero consistency. And they're sitting on €3,963.86 of my earned revenue while they figure out which reason they want to go with.
I did everything right. I filed the appeal. I made a detailed unlisted video walking through my entire creation process footage sources, AI generation workflow, voiceover, all of it. I submitted it as evidence.
YouTube rejected my appeal and told me a "human" reviewed it.
That video has 0 views. Nobody opened it. I have the analytics screenshot to prove it.
After a week of public pressure on here, I finally got an email from YouTube Partner Support admitting my channel is eligible for another appeal and escalating it to "internal specialists." Which tells you everything if the first human review was real, why does it suddenly need to be escalated now?
I shouldn't have to go viral on Twitter to get someone to actually look at my case. That's not a support system. That's a wall designed to make creators give up.
Under the EU's Digital Services Act, platforms are required to provide clear, consistent reasoning for enforcement actions and a functioning internal complaint process. YouTube has done neither. I've formally notified them (Ref: 6-7485000040347) and I am now filing a complaint with the EETT, Greece's regulatory authority.
All I'm asking for is what every creator deserves, one real person to look at the actual evidence.
@TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators@YouTube I've done everything your system asked me to do.
Please do the right thing.
If you think creators deserve a real process and not automated contradictions, please repost this.
Thank you.
@saintmirrenfc I honestly thought that the Old Firm would be docked points for that pitch invasion but evidently not a problem. Not a good look. Always a Buddie.
@emzerielo Interest dipped massively after the conclusion of 2021 season. Netflix saved F1 they say, killed it more like. The new regs are a travesty. Phoney and frighteningly dangerous.