A4HonestAbe

SFV-Alex Nation Wannabe Voice Actor Part of the @A4Army Go follow my dudes @a4andre and @ronaldokuna4

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

As always, follow my guy Ron on twitch. https://t.co/J6NXGvliI1
NOW! Thread of things I finished in 2022

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@NECRO_Xlll If this is about Rika, then I did. He's been in jail, confirmed pedophile.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@CaribouCoon @NECRO_Xlll In case you need a little summary, courtesy of an old friend

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@CaribouCoon https://t.co/Q8uayak9AL Few years later, but I gotta ask: what do you and @NECRO_Xlll think about this?

[oomf in law @OomfOfAnOomf]

IF ANYONE IS INTERESTED IN TRYING OUT BLAZBLUE AFTER THIS. DM ME AND I WILL BUY THE GAME FOR YOU.
I love blazblue and if making it a free to play game is what it takes to make it more popular, then I'll fund that myself. #PLAYCF #PLAYBBCF

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@BROWNDUST2_EN Wordle 1791 3/6

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
I don't know who you are or what you do, but I did good on the wordle today, I believe. Got parka in two guesses a few days back.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx Deserved, really. Anyway, about those truths you agree with him on?

[Busham0 the Half Straight VTuber 🥊🐓 @Busham0]

In EXTREMELY positive news for people everywhere,

Erick Pruzynski (aka Rikafag, Mr__Cynical, nonamenemo8, bern, etc) creator of “In Defense of Lolicon” and known CRIMINAL has had their channel taken down

They were know for Star Wars, Ratatouille and Crypto (lol) #goodriddance

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 Now, let's circle back here for a minute, because you really seem intent on not answering: what are these truths? You frame them as objective truths, yet do not share what they are. Are you ashamed of them? Or are you only willing to talk a big game and not actually play?

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 >arrested for possession of CSAM
>posts pictures of his little sister's feet
>talks about going to Thailand to fuck child prostitutes
"Surely he was only trolling and nothing more." Also, it's not like Rika is the only guy to have talked about this, even when he made the video.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 Do you assume most people can't critically think about the videos they consume? That they aren't capable of reasoning for themself? Do you assume I don't think you're capable of autonomy?

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 By saying he is right, you are indeed placing faith in him. That doesn't mean you agree with him wholeheartedly. Life's not that simple, nobody should agree with someone on every issue they speak on, let's not misconstrue the talking point.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 You're setting aside the fact that this guy raped kids in the name that he (possibly) stumbled upon some objective truth—one you seem to be unwilling to share. I'm not saying you endorse it, but it does kind of loom over the conversation when you could've cited anyone else

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 You can call my argument consequentialist, but the fact is that, if such an objective truth exists, you would trust this man to share it as intended, rather than how he would interpret it. So I implore you: what truths did this man impart for you to disregard his deeds?

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 That's a rather solipsistic view, isn't it? You present it as an absolute, yet trust an irrational human to not only discover such an absolute truth, but also trust them to know it to one and still present it as an absolute should they share it.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 Moreover, if one were to stumble upon a truth, how then would one know it to be the truth? That assumes that, upon accidentally discovering a truth, one would understand why it is the truth at its fundamental level.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 Fascinating quote and all, but two things: one, you've still not shares what truths you agree with him on, and two, my argument can't be disregarded so simply on those grounds. Because there were very real consequences that should call his motives into question.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 I don't know, I think in an instance like this—especially considering who we're talking about in particular—it kind of does matter. How one uses the truth is just as important as the truth itself.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 That may be, but what truths are we talking about? Could it not be said that his actions make some of the arguments he presented seem a little disingenuous in hindsight? Arguments that may or may not include ones you agree with?

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@phyonx @lurkingboat @Busham0 What would those good points be? Would you say that Rika made those points in good faith, considering he really did molest kids? You can't just say "he made good points, we should hear him out", considering his points didn't exist in a vacuum.

[A4HonestAbe @DIOBranflakes]

@Busham0 @DamnedLen Am I Peter or Chris