@daJMTexperience I guess radiometer got involved as I think my colleague wasn’t around. I meant to check in with it to see what happened, but other things took over.
@daJMTexperience @HeatherFTSUG Possibly. But on photographic film, the film is ionised. I don’t know the answer but I think a camera sensor doesn’t work that way. I may be over complicating it though. After all both light and x-rays are electromagnetic radiation.
As Nish says - if you have a +ve LFD *OR* any of the three main symptoms, however mild, please book a PCR rather than relying on an LFD.
This isn't just about an accurate result, it's crucially also providing a sample for sequencing that can be used to identify & track variants
@EdanStarforth@DrSelvarajah @dan26wales 4d chess? Oooh sounds fun. I s’pose you could argue that lab professionals occupy a different dimension. Which dimension depends on your view of us.
@p57951380@DrSelvarajah @dan26wales Far, far, far to many people. Used in the right way and at the right time they have their uses. I was tempted to make a comment about how you don’t get to choose which microbe... but decided to be good.
@i_petersen@michaelmina_lab@profbuchan@TheStatsGeek@ScienceShared Aren’t the false negatives just as much of a problem as a false positive? Can I get a copy of the paper? I’d like to review how the quality of the LFT was managed e,g. Who took swab, who performed test, how where storage conditions managed?
@MI5GCJ@SingletonWayne@dralisonj LFT not particularly great at picking up anything. LFT needs millions of virus particles to turn positive. PCR needs hundreds to turn positive. (Bit of an over simplification still)
@aliactorest@invadingpirate@doctor_oxford From what I can see LFT is nose and throat swab. PCR is nasopharyngeal or depending on local testing might be nasal. PCR is not necessarily more unpleasant. I was shocked when I saw the instructions for LFT asking for n + t. Much more unpleasant for little gain in quality.