An interesting capture from my ISS UAP Detector on the May 1st Spacewalk. The detection appears just as astronauts exit the ISS. To play it down a bit, it bears several hallmarks of a lens flare, but is also particularly distinct, persistent, and well-timed. Check the long vid.
This is HUGE news.
PhD astronomer and former NASA engineer Ivo Busko has single-handedly driven a final nail into the coffin of the contamination-based hypotheses (e.g. plate defects and cosmic rays) proposed to explain the VASCO transients. He did so using one of the most creative approaches in astronomy I have ever seen: by analysing pre-Sputnik photographic plates from a German telescope known to suffer from severe optical distortions (aberrations), he demonstrated that the transients appear on these plates and exhibit the same optical distortions as the stars themselves. They are slightly narrower and sharper than the stars, consistent with brief flashes.
This is a crucial result. It shows that the transient light passed through the telescope optics, meaning the transients originate from real objects producing light, rather than from plate defects or cosmic-ray contamination that hit the plate. Dr Busko has also shown that the transients cluster spatially and are associated with periods close to nuclear tests. See the example of the triple transient with optical comas.
This is the greatest gift. Congratulations, Ivo.
I'm happy beyond belief.
Read Ivo Busko's paper: https://t.co/6CT58wnsKJ
@fin365 But what does that lead you to Fin? You, like I, have fairly unambiguous experiences. Do you think the visitors are trans-temporal and somehow avoid capture, or is there some control system that gets the good video etc?
The Feds didn’t just tell us that.
They implied that everyone claiming that there was something huge going on was stupid, manipulative, crazy, greedy, lying and/or faking.
It’s the active willful destruction of American dissenters by our own government that cannot be forgiven.
If something important has been withheld on what I'll call for simplicity's sake "the UFO subject" we have no idea at all what the effect of this missing information about our universe and our world has done to our psyches and our society. Could it be that many of our problems, problems we cast about blaming on all sorts of imagined factors, in fact stem from a flawed or incomplete picture of reality? From an invisible chain reaction unleashed by basic intellectual deficits?
I think it's very possible.
EXCLUSIVE: From then acting Director of @DoW_AARO, Tim Philips, on @GallaudetTim visit to AARO:
‘…Sean was gone. I met with Tim for close to two hours when serving as the acting AARO Director….the meeting was between him and myself.’
Sean can’t stop lying! Why?!
@grok@digijordan Thanks @grok. Let's dig down some because this is important. One outcome the IC rigged the lottery to payout a temporarily inconvenienced pedophile (J.E.), while the other outcome is perfectly normal and prosaic.
Epstein reportedly got Congress to cancel funding for a scientist named Stanley Pons who was researching cold fusion and getting results according to leaked mails
Epstein influenced Congress to kill his funding, and other scientists discredited him by trying to recreate his work but doing it incorrectly so they could claim it never worked.
This is very similar to the Fallout TV show plot, where a scientist invents cold fusion, Vault-Tec buys out her company, labels her a communist, blacklists her, and discredits her.
On my honeymoon and had a stop at Lago Cote, site of COMETA report cover and "The Best UFO Photo Ever Taken?".
#UAPX#IYKYK
Had to miss @chrisramsay52 and @AlchemyAmerican at The Rialto in Montreal, but what can you do?
S/O to @BryceZabel Link to Famous Photo Here --> https://t.co/Zv7ITScsCo
NEW: Revealed: Unexplained objects that stop and accelerate quickly in space detected by 'highly qualified observers, says former UFO chief. 'Spacecraft we know don't behave that way' https://t.co/KBHHYbfmZu
I am still beyond perplexed at the monolithic UFO Legacy Program portrayed in the Age of Disclosure, referred to as the "UAP crash retrieval portfolio".
This WILDLY inaccurate representation of UFO legacy programs is illustrated by Lue Elizondo, Eric Davis, Hal Puthoff, and Jay Stratton. These figures state the @CIA Directorate of Science and Technology (DS&T) is in charge of the entire "crash retrieval portfolio", with the Department of Energy, US Air Force, and defense contractors like @northropgrumman on an equal playing field beneath them.
This, to me, is willfully inaccurate. Let's just reference a few issues here:
- @ENERGY with their creative classifications inherited from the 1954 Atomic Energy Agreement (Special Nuclear Materials, Transclassified Foreign Nuclear Information, Foreign Intelligence Information, etc), and specialized units such as NEST (Nuclear Emergency Support Team) with their NF-MAP (National Foresnices Material Analysis Program), operate subordinate to CIA DS&T?
- Defense contractors have the same access to information as the Department of Energy and US Air Force?.... Hal Puthoff rationalizes this as programs are kept within defense contractors to keep eyes away from FOIA. I strongly disagree - taking programs out of USG exposes such clandestine operations to exponentially greater risks of leakage or spycraft. (This is why I always stake the missing link between USG and contractors is FFRDC)
- CIA is one of 6 of the US Big 6 intelligence agencies - where are the other Big 6, such as the NGA and DIA, operating as Combat Support Agencies within the programs? Where is the NRO with supplied overhead collection systems for retrieval teams? Where is the NURO supplying undersea reconnaissance?
- Missing entities - Other Big 6 IC agencies, DARPA, IARPA, Navy, Army, FFRDC, UARC, Elements of the OSD including USD(A&S) and USD(I), the National Security Council, other Tier 1 units outside of USAF SOF 24th STS, 160th SOAR, DARPA SID, AFOSI/PJ, DOE OICI? Could go on and on and on there.
Let's take the exclusion of the US Navy as an example:
"The majority of crash retrievals or recoveries and whatever situation it was take place in the maritime environment." - Eric Davis 2025 UAP Hearing (Thank you @polarityjosh for the improved audio https://t.co/1WwabcI5uh )
So Eric Davis, one of the prominent voices detailing the monolithic Legacy Program, says most CRs are in the maritime environment, but the Navy is not included in this framework?...
So a C-5 Galaxy out of Air Mobility Command is just supposed to land on the water in the Pacific, and a group of Airmen will fish out a recovery?
Absolutely not, I have detailed some incredibly interesting maritine crash recoveries before that feature HEAVY involvement from the US Navy dating back to 1964's "Deep Submergence Systems Project" established to drastically increase the depth at which the US Navy could perform deep-ocean engineering to satisfy "Project Sand Dollar" (a compartmented SAP established to itemize and possibly retrieve items of national security interest from the sea floor).
Highly recommend checking that out as I detailed here: https://t.co/T5QkZlmBYu
Of course, the Navy is not monolithic - only select compartments of the Navy would be involved in such highly compartmented USAPs, such as the Office of Naval Research or the Office of Naval Intelligence.
Seems bizarre Jay Stratton worked within the Office of Naval Intelligence as an SES (Senior Executive Service - civilian equivalent to a flag officer or general officer), yet the Navy is not included in this Legacy Program framework.
https://t.co/reJAVFcxLW
Additionally, on 13 January, 2025 @LiberationTimes posted an excellent article titled "UFO Allegedly Stored at East Coast Navy Facility as Material Transfer Claims Resurface" (thanks for referencing me in the article Chris!) This article spoke about NAS Pax River (Naval Air Station Patuxent River).
Great article: https://t.co/YgT9A0eJIF
This article states, "Liberation Times understands that an exotic vehicle of unknown origin has been stored for decades at Naval Air Station Patuxent River (‘Pax River’) in Maryland."
Not only do I agree with Chris Sharp here, but I also believe the USNTPS (US Navy Test Pilot School), alongside the AFTC TPC (Air Force Test Center Test Pilot School), fields select pilots to operate manned derivative airframes or alien reproduction vehicles.
I find it intriguing that on 19 January, the Daily Times posted an article discussing Chris Sharp's work about recovered UFOs and NAS Pax River.
On 22 January, Lue Elizondo reposted the article: https://t.co/WvnGXUqFJx
By posting this article, I think it is safe to assume Elizondo agrees NAS Pax River has stored recovered UFOs.
But the Navy isn't in Elizondo's legacy framework, so who then manages the storage and security of these craft(s) at NAVAIR's headquarters?
So Elizondo has shared articles regarding UFOs being stored at Pax River, Stratton operated within ONI as an SES, and Eric Davis says most UFO retrievals are maritime.... Yet the Navy is not present in their crash retrieval framework.......
Two Options:
1. Characters in AoD tried to dumb down the legacy framework. This results in a dishonest and inaccurate outline. If the goal is to show this to POTUS, the intelligence is not actionable. A complicated outline of programs can be correctly and effectively conveyed to a general audience.
2. Characters in the film are debating who gets to catch the live hand grenade while withholding other information and protecting certain agencies/offices. In this case, it would be DOE, CIA DS&T, and USAF to be exposed.
I go with option 2, and I would be curious to see who in Age of Disclosure has ties to US National Security Council-run UFO legacy crash retrieval programs.