New cancer drugs offer marginal survival benefit. Initial drug approvals with nonrobust trials may overstate efficacy. @US_FDA, physicians, patients, insurers must evaluate drug's efficacy, price, reimbursement on indication-specific level @JCO_ASCO@ASCO https://t.co/mjVWOolKHb
Findin' a best pricing approach 💲to #cancer drugs 💊💉 is still a challenge. Just after the presentation of the data at #ESMO24, @DTMichaeli 's full paper on #value -based pricing is now finally out!
Don't miss Daniel's work at: https://t.co/dRleFS9sht
💊💲New paper: "Value-Based Indication-Specific and Weighted-Average Pricing: Estimated Price and Cost Savings for Cancer Drugs"
🚨 Indication-specific/ weighted-average pricing could save 11% of US cancer drug expenditure
📖https://t.co/ypttcnI8BJ
@NCT_HD@uniklinik_hd@DKFZ
#Reviews: Breast cancer drugs: FDA approval, development time, efficacy, clinical benefits, innovation, trials, endpoints, quality of life, value, and price https://t.co/QVcnFuEQzo - Breast Cancer - #senology#oncology#breast#cancer
Implementing weighted-average drug pricing in the United States could reduce the cost of cancer drugs, data suggest. Presented at #ESMO2024 by @DTMichaeli. #ESMO24 https://t.co/wTA23WRXqT
🫁 Our poster on new NSCLC drugs with @ADesaiMD at #ESMO24
💊56 FDA NSCLC approvals 2000-2022
🆙Avg. benefit: OS 3 mts, PFS 1.8 mts
🧬Biomarkers (64%) with shorter dvlp times, greater benefit, and cost-effectiveness
@NCT_HD@DKFZ@uniklinik_hd @LMU_Uniklinikum @ONealCancerUAB
Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 @US_FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications https://t.co/QzHLoaouRQ via @DTMichaeli et al
Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications
Original research by @DTMichaeli@NCT_HD@Uniklinik_HD@DKFZ et al.
Link: https://t.co/F0C5tqdV38
Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications
Original research by @DTMichaeli@NCT_HD@Uniklinik_HD@DKFZ et al.
Link: https://t.co/F0C5tqdV38
Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications
Original research by @DTMichaeli@NCT_HD@Uniklinik_HD@DKFZ et al.
Link: https://t.co/F0C5tqdV38
Study reports cancer drugs with multiple FDA designations are associated with faster development but lack robust trial evidence and tend towards higher prices. @DTMichaeli@uniklinik_hd@NCT_HD@LMU_Muenchen@TU_Muenchen
Read here: https://t.co/mAQTDxex5z
Pivotal trial design is significantly associated with measured treatment effects.
The analysed efficacy population (intention-to-treat, per-protocol, or as-treated) was not consistently associated with treatment effects. 🤷🏽♀️
#Meta-analysis https://t.co/0GTNvu9Lch
Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications @BMJ_EBM
https://t.co/yOKRLCPHj9
Breast cancer drugs: @US_FDA approval, development time, efficacy, clinical benefits, innovative essays, trials, endpoints & price via @darioT_ & @DTMichaeli et al Conclusions are not very flattering @Liz_ORiordan@DrMarkLythgoe
Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 @US_FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications https://t.co/DTgrFUeil2 via @DTMichaeli et al @DrMarkLythgoe
⚖️In conclusion, the Breakthrough Therapy Designation expedites patient access to innovative and effective, yet also expensive, new drugs. We find evidence that breakthrough drugs could offer patients a greater clinical benefit.