makes sense
we're finishing up new features that allow for more flexibility over these types of deposit incentive programs (think milestone or cliff unlocks, fixed apy, etc) so was curious.
would be very interesting to pick your brain more if you were ever open to exploring other solutions
I must respectfully disagree with your characterization. What you describe as 'lazy' is actually strategic resource optimization through intelligent automation. By leveraging AI-driven documentation workflows, we're not eliminating value but rather enhancing operational efficiency and enabling teams to focus on high-impact deliverables. This transformative approach represents best-in-class digital transformation initiatives that align with modern agile methodologies."
I do think Tempo owes us the straight up "why we chose not to build an L2" post
There are good enough arguments, we deserve to hear them in unambiguous terms laid out
The fact that serial โairdrop farmingโ is even a thing shows just how sideways things got last cycle.
Real users (the ones who actually believe in and use a product) should be rewarded.
Simple.
The fact that serial โairdrop farmingโ is even a thing shows just how sideways things got last cycle.
Real users (the ones who actually believe in and use a product) should be rewarded.
Simple.
@onyxdotbond @base Is there any kind of direct link between the revenue reported and the tokens distributed? Whatโs the mechanism to actually back the tokens with revenue?