Help name the future of $BNC.
Vote below.
Have another idea? Share it in the replies.
Advisory poll. Not a shareholder vote. Final name subject to Board approval and legal clearance.
Seems like the obvious choice is to buy back solana:3RZhwmcD2y1pq9roatMvaXxWR5VadTgxF6AL7TCLpump token & Purchase the #1 memecoin, which is undoubtedly gonna be gstock:native
At this point, I have no doubt gstock:native will be the first token on Genius listed on Binance Alpha.
Huge win for the Geniuses!
The @GeniusFDN has accumulated $125,000 of $BNB, given that it can't be unwrapped, the foundation would like to propose 3 options: Buy, Split ($GENIUS & #1 Meme), or Hold.
We will use the full $BNB balance at the end of the poll.
What does the community want?
What I like most about GFUND is how the tax actually creates value:
1.25% → Giggle Academy, helping bring free education to millions of children
0.25% → Buyback & burn
0.5% → Genius ecosystem & community growth
Every transaction gives something back.
Not just a memecoin — a community-powered model built around giving, sustainability, and real impact.
This is the kind of innovation I want to see on Genius. 🧠 @ryanmyher
So I found something.
@GeniusTerminal next updates will include launching tokens with custom ending numbers, potentially "1111" - Reasons below.
1. CEO @ryanmyher publicly endorsed the idea that Genius tokens should have a unified, special ending for better brand-recognition, like Flap's "7777" or Fourmeme's "4444".
-> Good idea, I didn't know why they did not do this sooner.
2. 2 days ago, a creator wallet launched this token:
0x6a49d2d9e9d0f0c5db415ccdab48fe5015e01111
And they verified the source code of that token, which matches the exact source codes of all Genius tokens.
Bscscan also shows that all Genius token source codes are verified and that they all match the above token.
Check bscscan for proof yourself:
- Copy any genius token contract
- Paste to bscscan -> go to "contract" -> all token contracts point to that exact source code of that token.
See image below.
Then at 15:47 UTC Sept 20th, the same creator wallet created another special ending "0000" token, named "NTest".
Weird, creating "1111" and "0000".
But then just 2 hours later, Genius posted that all their contract source codes are verified.
This is not a coincidence.
➡️ I suspect the "1111" and "0000" ending tokens are test tokens created by the team, and they used the "1111" token to verify the source codes.
➡️ They haven't confirmed on the ending yet, as you can see, they launch "1111" and "0000" -> still decided which one to choose. My bet is on "1111"
If it's not the team, then explain:
- Why would Genius let anyone verify the source code before them?
- Why would Genius post that their contracts have been verified AFTER the fact?
- Why would the CEO endorse the special ending idea now, after everything is tested on-chain?
- Why "1111" is the contract used to verify contracts and not other contracts ending in "0000" or "8888"?
All of this is not confirmed, just my theory. We have to wait for official updates
Creators should be able to direct 100% fees to a wallet of their choice @GeniusTerminal
I think this is perfect for Charity Tokens.
Right now on Genius, fees are allocated to "burn" and "genius platform", which takes up about 37.5% of total fees.
Don't get me wrong, allocating to Burn and Platform is good for token + Genius, but we're talking about Freedom of Choice here. If a token wants to allocate all fees to a specific Donation address, they should be able to.
Great example is $MAX on Flap, they donated well over $1.5m to @GiggleAcademy with 100% fees
Genius is a great platform and we can use it for greater cause @ryanmyher
We've paid over $650,000 in creator fees to deployers on https://t.co/rIU4NwhzBf.
Creators earn up to 1.25% of the collected fees generated by their token.
Join them and launch your own. 👇
@ryanmyher@GeniusTerminal Love what you're doing Ryan, great founders listening to communities.
Hope to see this feature next. 100% fees to charity would be huge.
Some people are asking whether $GFUND creator fees really go to the Giggle Academy wallet.
Don’t trust us. Verify it on-chain.
Step 1: Open Genius Factory 4.2
0x37eE8AeE29C5efd3C1A7edA6dF3F510779928a37
BscScan → Contract → Read Contract → getLaunchedToken
Step 2: Enter $GFUND token
0xf62948133DE2C4e17352Fc7d5163F2BdAE844cA3
Step 3: Check creatorFeeRecipient
It returns:
0xc7f501d25ea088aefca8b4b3ebd936aae12bf4a4
That is the Giggle Academy wallet set to receive the creator fees.
You can also see $BNCB fee distributions arriving at the same address on-chain.
No promises. No screenshots required.
Read the contract. Follow the money. Verify it yourself.
$GFUND / $BNCB
When will there be a full 100% fees directed to a specific wallet?
I noticed most Charity tokens on Genius has a fixed 25% sent to "Genius Platform" and 12.5% to "Burn".
Like $GFUND for example, they want to direct 100% fees to @GiggleAcademy donation address, but 25% of fees are still directed to Genius Platform and 12.5% to Burn.
If a token creator wants to direct 100% fees to a Charity, shouldn't they be able to?
It would be a great feature to add in the future @ryanmyher
ANNOUNCEMENT: https://t.co/rIU4NwhzBf source code is now verified. ✅
All tokens launched are now eligible for pre-listing pools, giving projects another path to build more liquidity and visibility before a potential listing.
Weird @ryanmyher
I was looking into bscscan's data, and all of your token contract source codes all point to an "exact match" source code of another token with "1111" ending.
Does this mean creators can also choose "1111" as their ending for tokens as well?
What does this mean for other tokens on the platform?
Below example is the $GSTOCK contract points to this contract as source code match
0x6a49d2d9e9d0f0c5db415ccdab48fe5015e01111
All other tokens also pointed to it.
@ryanmyher@Daryl11672791 Hey @ryanmyher, how come Genius tokens don't have a custom ending numbers like Flap with "7777", or fourmeme with "4444"?
Will there be such token contracts in the next updates?