@DoltonIssac @Perimeter There are many current technological challenges & problems to solve. But one of the biggest is coming up with new & better ways to produce energy. Eg. fusion, solar etc.
@americanbouy Many electrical signals in the brain like brain waves are naturally analog. Any signals that we can measure with our instruments, we could convert into digital signals that could be transmitted elsewhere.
Honey, we shrunk @SamGyimah! 🙀🔬⚛️ UK researchers in quantum tech are turning science fiction into reality. Find out more in the latest mind-bending episode of #ScienceSpotlight#IndustrialStrategy
@isaitrejo@Perimeter Many equations from physics are used in totally different area like predicting the stock market (stochastic differential equations). But as far as I know Yang Mills theory isn’t used anywhere else, at least yet.
@DaveFishPI Not sure of the exact context in the lecture, but the initial NS merger was 130 million ly away. 130 ly away is, of course, past Alpha Centuri. So, maybe not be grav bound.
@Warren_Tilston Blazars have been observed since the 1950s. They weren't groundbreaking in the sense of being totally unexpected & totally revolutionary. But they're really cool in teaching more about black holes.
@Warren_Tilston Great question! This is a topic of current research. Lots of ideas but some are that the core of a neutron star has lots of quarks. Another is superconducting protons. Experiments underway to tell these theories apart.
@Gypsykenny@EGesteau@Perimeter It is *possible* that white holes may help explain a black hole's singularity but, as you know, they're speculative. What we'd probably all like is new physics that doesn't break down at the singularity (like GR does) to figure out what's going on. We need quantum gravity!
@GeorgeCMichas@Perimeter That's a deep question! But I fear it goes beyond my expertise and even science itself. We just don't know. Hard to imagine a connection between these dark things & consciousness as very different. But we're not sure.
@americanbouy@EGesteau@Perimeter We mostly measure size of proton by bouncimg things off of it. Physicists call it scattering experiments. We measure size based on how many particles incident on protons get scattered etc. Even though protons are dynamic, their size is fairly constant
@rodrigo_univasf @Perimeter I'd invest in both! For the particular problems we know quantum computers are good at (finding new medical drugs, simulating quantum reality), I'd say quantum computers are better. But there are lots of complex systems for which we have no evidence that they're superior.
@segundoguerrero The main reason is that dark matter hardly ever interacts with things on Earth. There's lots of it around, we think, but almost all dark matter particles pass right through Earth & out the other side w/o interacting with anything. This makes dark matter VERY hard to detect.
@americanbouy@Perimeter Not exactly sure what you mean by the membrane but protons are made of even smaller quarks plus interaction energy between the quarks (gluons). And quarks are made of, well we're not quite sure ...
@DrMattB@Perimeter Absolutely. The biggest effect is Einstein's famous E = m c squared, which is part of relativity. Most of the mass of a proton actually comes from energy in interactions between the quarks that make it up. And from Einstein's equation, this energy is equivalent to a mass.
@hinsterrr@Perimeter From using stellar models, inc. our understanding of forces (gravity, neutron pressure), scientists know ranges for the masses (1.4 to ~2 solar masses) & radii of pulsars (~10 km). We've been able to measure the masses of few individual pulsars by observing their magnetic fields