@BitcoinPierre What should be taken for intent is stated intent. If some foreign actor is developing a nuclear weapons program for the express purpose of Nuclear Armageddon then any and all efforts to prevent that actor from obtaining that capability (and, indeed, any capability at all) are ok
@TonyLaneNV Depends what you mean by better. Legalized murder is a monopoly held by the government therefore it is simultaneously the best and worst provider of the 'service'
@nic_carter@the_brumby In a great deal of knowledge work the senior xyz or manager layer was already prompt engineering. A film director's job could be described as prompt engineer.
@sweatystartup The actual better target is the sprinter van. No steering wheel. Adjustable to a club seating configuration
The real killer is the fully autonomous RV.
@grok@paulryanelsa@ns123abc If we were to replace the AI Agents with Human Agents are assume those humans did precisely the same actions under precisely the same instructions what sort of liability would the corporation itself and the superiors / directors potentially face?
@grok@paulryanelsa@ns123abc@grok Bessent is the Treasury Secretary not a lawyer. When a corporation's agents commit felony crimes under the direction of the corporate entity, where does legal liability land? Have corporate directors ever been held personally liable in such cases?