Joe

Co-host of The Shocking Details podcast! Also co-creator of Thinking Sideways Podcast. Wannabe Sherlock by day, cat herder the rest of the time

[Joe @DangerProbe]

Breaking!!
@ShockingDetails @vcaldoni
#DBCooper

[Joe @DangerProbe]

@xwanyex They were counting on jury nullification, so in that sense it really IS a blow.

[wretchardthecat @wretchardthecat]

The reason Digwa's family played the race card in the Nowak murder was because they knew they it would likely work. And it did. They were aware the card existed as did everyone who has not been living under a rock.

That is why this incident should not only or even primarily be about an individual criminal act of an ethnic individual but about the industry of get out of jail cards manufactured by the political masters of the police.

The race card would not have been used by the perps -- indeed it would not even have been imagined by them -- had it not been manufactured and indeed subliminally advertised. Two knives were plunged into the dying student that night. First the physical blade now in some evidence room. But there is a second political one and it is still loose on the streets.

To the crime already adudicated one more crime can yet be added: that of sending scapegoats to jail that we may let his political enablers may walk to collect their honors.

https://t.co/hl5H8Eab9r

[Tyler O'Neil @Tyler2ONeil]

🚨READ IT

The Justice Department just secured a superseding indictment against the Southern Poverty Law Center, and it reveals some new bombshells

🧵1/20

https://t.co/uRCbnWaBzr

[Cynical Publius @CynicalPublius]

RE: Pentagon Reporting

Please realize that every bit of reporting you see coming from major legacy media sources about anything Pete Hegseth, the Pentagon or Department of War is doing is butthurt propaganda.

I’ll explain.

You see, for years and years the major legacy media outlets such as the NYT, WaPo, Reuters, etc. have had privileged, largely unfettered access to the Pentagon—access other news outlets never enjoyed. This worked great in Democrat administrations, because the media was totally onboard with the DEI destruction of our nation’s military, and the Democrats knew the media would never abuse its access to undermine them. However, when a Republican is in office, that access was wielded against the administration via unauthorized leaks of classified and other controlled information, not to report the news, but to destroy policies those media members disagreed with.

And Pete Hegseth put a stop to that leftist gravy train. No more uncontrolled access. No more ability to get meaningful, unauthorized info from “sources familiar with the issue.” Zip. Nada. Nothing. He didn’t stop the legacy media from writing what they want—they always have had that right. No, he simply stopped the ability for certain members of the legacy press to undermine national security via privileged access that was denied the rest of the media.

And boy oh boy are they butthurt over that. So butthurt that they have lost whatever residual ability they may have once had to report honestly, and now everything they write is a character assassination piece sourced by anonymous “sources.”

Put simply, they are lying liars lying lies because they got their feelings hurt.

Couple this with the fact that the Gen Z “journalists” doing this reporting tend to have as deep an understanding of warfare as does my cat, and I just explained why any time you read Pentagon reporting from a legacy news outlet, you should assume the opposite of what you are reading is the truth.

[Winston Marshall @MrWinMarshall]

These scum bag politicians are appalling. Two-tier policing is literally in the police code. The audacity to go after Farage for speaking the truth is a disgrace. They’re more upset with him than about the murder. Starmer is a nasty, nasty piece of work

[Nate Silver @NateSilver538]

The fact that California elections often can't be resolved for weeks is kind of insane and not common in other electoral systems around the world.

[Joe @DangerProbe]

@lamps_apple Once again, we see that Orange Hitler isn't remotely as bad as the people claiming to want to save America from him.

[Joe @DangerProbe]

@christopherrufo And also--hi to Jack

[Joe @DangerProbe]

@christopherrufo True. Both Washington and Oregon are very red states with blue dots (Portland, Seattle). Frustrates me to hear people talking about pitching the whole west coast into the trash.

[Dan Burmawi @DanBurmawy]

It’s frightening to look back at what Hitchens warned about 20 years ago, and yet Europe ignored him and carried on, becoming a hellhole regardless of his warning.

[Jonathan Turley @JonathanTurley]

The ethics complaint against Todd Blanche is the latest example of the left’s self-perpetuating lawfare machine. It is no accident that this hit job on Blanche called upon the New York courts and bar to deliver the coup de grâce. https://t.co/kkT9Z9HHa8

[The Drunk Republican @DrunkRepub]

The fact that we are having a hard time throwing America a 250th birthday party because leftists are threatening to kill everyone involved is the most zeitgeist shit I’ve ever seen in my life

[Art @ZarkFiles]

The E. Jean Carroll case against President Trump is one of the strangest civil cases in American history. The foundational problem is this: Carroll could not identify when the alleged incident occurred — not even the year with any precision.
That should have killed the case as dead as a skunk on the road right there.
Without a temporal anchor, no defendant — regardless of guilt or innocence — can mount an alibi defense. Trump, who has maintained detailed calendars and staff records for decades, was denied the most basic tool of self-defense: the ability to establish where he was. That is not a technicality. It is a due process violation at the constitutional level.
Then Carroll produced the one piece of physical evidence she claimed corroborated her account — the dress she wore during the alleged incident. It was subsequently established that the dress was designed after the incident could have occurred. The sole corroborating evidence falsified her timeline.
The case proceeded anyway.
The resulting verdict was then weaponized in a defamation suit — where Trump was held liable for denying the allegation, while being procedurally barred from defending against it, because it was already "proven" in another court, regardless how flawed the procedure was. He was punished, in effect, for asserting his own innocence.
Compounding everything: coordinated professional and physical threats so thoroughly intimidated the legal community that attorneys refused these cases regardless of available fees. When you systematically destroy a defendant's ability to retain counsel of choice, you forfeit the right to a legitimate verdict.
An allegation is not evidence. Process without substance is not law. And a verdict produced under these conditions carries no legitimate authority — whatever its formal status.

Not only is it the right move to investigate Carroll, but every other person involved as well. Trump is owed serious damages here, and there may be a few people who belong in prison for their roles in the case.

[Mark Judge @markgjudge]

@ZarkFiles https://t.co/WPn5tvT6BU

[Rob Henderson @robkhenderson]

How many more laps are we gonna take around retard mountain before we accept that standardized testing works.

[Today in History @TodayinHistory]

Napoleon was crowned King of Italy right here today in 1805.

[Art @ZarkFiles]

Before I show you what I found in Georgia's clone records, you need to understand the landscape.
Georgia's voter database contains names across a wide spectrum of frequency — from names that appear exactly once to names that appear more than a thousand times.
4,027,260 names appear exactly once. They cannot be cloned. There is no second record to match against.
But look at the 2-5 band: 696,687 unique names representing 1,825,382 total records.
That is where the cloneable pool lives — in the rare-to-mid frequency names, not the common ones.
This matters for what comes next.
Because in Georgia, something happens in the clone data that I have not seen before in any other state I have analyzed.

[Breanna Morello @BreannaMorello]

It’s actually hard to believe this is a real tweet.

[Dries Van Langenhove @DVanLangenhove]

These two paragraphs of my verdict are crucial for everyone to read and understand.

"Even if all of the statements made by Van Langenhove are based on scientific evidence and statistics, it makes no difference to the criminal intent. Van Langenhove is not charged with spreading false information. He is charged with presenting facts in a way that incites hatred against persons on the grounds of one or more of the protected criteria in the Anti-Racism Law.” 1⃣

"For Van Langenhove to have committed a crime, it is not necessary for him to have incited concrete acts of hate or violence. It suffices that others are incited to take on a general attitude of intolerance or disapproval regarding a group protected under the criteria of the Anti-Racism Law." 2⃣

This means you can go to jail for "inciting hatred" even if your statements were 100% factual (see 1⃣) and even if you did NOT incite concrete acts of hate (see 2⃣).

The benchmark of "inciting hatred" , a crime punishable by prison, is thus "saying something that has the potential of inciting someone to have a general attitude of disapproval regarding a protected group". This means literally any criticism of mass migration is now a punishable offence. If you cite a statistic, and someone could potentially think less of a protected group (like migrants) because of it, you can be jailed.

The craziest part is that there is no defence possible against this. I brought the scientific studies that I cited to court, but the judge didn't care 1⃣. I also proved that the hundreds of students present at the lecture included students of all different political affiliations, and everyone was able to voice their opinion or ask questions. The lecture went very calmly, so obviously nobody was incited to hatred. But this too did not matter 2⃣, because if the judge says he believes there is the possibility that someone COULD be incited to "a general attitude of disapproval", this is enough for the judge to send me to jail, even without any evidence.

I'm telling you this to warn you that by the time these hate speech laws have come into place, it's already too late. You will NEVER be able to beat these laws in court. You have to stop them before they are implemented. Let my fate be your warning.

[Joe @DangerProbe]

Hey @HarmeetKDhillon @elonmusk you seeing this?

[Art @ZarkFiles]

About 5 years ago, I started researching voter roll data in the United States. Since then, I have published 7 peer-reviewed articles on the subject, most in the Journal of information Warfare (links in comments).

I am the first person to publish anything on the subject of hidden algorithms in voter rolls, and remain the only person to have published on the subject.

More importantly, this study has revealed that no state of the 12+ I have looked at meet normal standards for database management or security. If the state election boards were banks or any other regulated industry, they would be shut down.

They could complain about "incompetent clerks" and "accumulated errors over time" all they want, but they'd still be shut down.