Danico Studio

Our design studio creates art, mascots, animations, banners, logos, and other infographics.

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

Just bought a bag of $DOT and I’m not here for hopium.

Here’s why I’m betting on @Polkadot hitting double digits in 2025 - and why this isn’t just another L1 moonshot thread.

Let’s start with the chart:
DOT’s held $3.70–$3.80 like a rock all April.
$3.85 flipped into support. RSI’s got room.
Momentum’s building - and $4.50 is the next real test.

But that’s just surface-level stuff.

Under the hood?
Polkadot 2.0 is live and unfolding:

- Agile Coretime Coretime is replacing slot auctions
- JAM SDK is shipping for devs
- XCM is the real cross-chain protocol (not a bridge duct-taped on)

This isn’t another promise.
It’s quietly running today.

Then you’ve got ETF catalysts lining up:

- Grayscale Polkadot Trust decision - June 11
- 21Shares filed. Coinbase Custody handling storage.
If SEC gives the green light? That’s not hype. That’s institutions.

The ecosystem?

- 150 parachains by EOY
- Projects migrating for lower fees, real infra
- DePIN (peaq), AI (Lightchain), GameFi (Mythical x FIFA) - they’re not plugging into Web3, they’re operating inside it.
That’s native.

And yeah, I see the risks:

- ETF rejection
- Macro headwindsout
- Macro headwinds
- ETH & SOL staying dominant

But the asymmetric upside is obvious.
$8–10 EOY? Reasonable.
More? Definitely possible))

Bottom line?

DOT isn’t just a bet on price...
It’s a bet on infrastructure, coordination, and a protocol that’s been shipping while others have been tweeting.

The bag’s packed.
Let’s see where we land in Q4!!

#DOT #Polkadot #Web3 #CryptoNarrative #CryptoAlpha #ETFSeason #LayerZero

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

Hello, everyone! Our design studio has officially launched. How do you like the animation? 😀

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

Read moreStrength position from @polkaworld_org .
Decentralization ≠ sponsorship without commitment.

If Polkadot's coffers are at risk of $5M $DOT, it's logical to demand:
- clear KPIs
- tokenomics with DOT holders in mind
- A retention strategy, not just airdrop.

Web3 is built on trust, but not blindness...

[PolkaWorld @polkaworld_org]

Hayek once said: “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”

In an open governance system, freedom means that everyone can make proposals, vote, and participate in shaping direction. But this also requires us to remain clear-headed and disciplined in how we allocate public resources—especially when faced with large-scale, high-potential proposals that have yet to define concrete deliverables.

As a Decentralized Voice (DV), PolkaWorld has consistently sought to strike a balance between supporting ecosystem growth and safeguarding public funds. We are not against funding, nor do we dismiss the efforts of projects. However, we believe proposals—especially those requesting significant amounts—should not rely solely on reputation or popularity. Instead, they should be goal-driven, include evaluable milestones, and carry quantifiable accountability.

A truly decentralized, sustainable ecosystem should not be built on “blind spending” but on rational trust, open collaboration, and clear commitments.

@hydration_net is undeniably one of the more active and recognized projects in our ecosystem. As reflected in the proposal’s comments, a large part of the community has shown strong support. From a user adoption perspective, we agree that having a successful breakout project in the @Polkadot ecosystem is vital—it can bring much-needed liquidity and new users.

That said, we must now ask: Should the marketing costs of a high-potential project be borne entirely by the Polkadot Treasury, which is owned collectively by all DOT holders?

The core distinction lies here: when other DeFi projects deploy $100M or $200M in liquidity incentives, they do so with investor capital—not free funding from something like the Ethereum Foundation. Their investors hold tokens and expect returns. In contrast, the Polkadot Treasury, as it stands today, acts as a grant provider, not an investor, and does not receive any tokens in return. As we at PolkaWorld have long pointed out, this mismatch of roles has created recurring friction and governance confusion.

Incentives can indeed unlock integrations, but the team has mentioned that future integrations may require additional Treasury support. So how do we distinguish between integrations that are the project’s own business expenses, and those that serve the broader DOT holder community and thus warrant Treasury funding? This circles back to a fundamental question: Does Hydration belong to its core team and HDX holders, or to all DOT holders? Community members calling for acquiring a stake in Hydration (or at least receiving HDX in exchange) are not entirely unreasonable in this context.🤔

5 million DOT represents nearly 30% of the current DOT balance across the Relay Chain and Asset Hub. If such a large portion of Treasury funds is allocated to a single high-potential project—without clear deliverables or defined success metrics—that effectively shifts the market risk to the Polkadot DAO. If we expect quantifiable milestones from smaller proposals, why should larger ones be exempt? Setting clear goals is not only a commitment to the Treasury, but also a way to motivate the Hydration team, the broader community, and all contributors actively supporting the campaign.

Right now, the Treasury is being asked to act like an investor—selecting a promising project and pinning its hopes on its success—without receiving any of the upside typically expected in return.

What’s more, we’ve yet to see a retention plan: How will we keep the users and liquidity that arrive during the incentive period? As we know, many "airdrop-focused" users have low loyalty. TVL and user numbers may rise quickly, but what happens when the market shifts? What strategies are in place to retain users once the incentives stop? The proposal offers no concrete answers on this front.

To be clear: we are not opposed to supporting ambitious, high-expectation projects with Treasury funding. But should come with clear goals, defined strategies, and explicit commitments.

(PS: We are not here to stir controversy or spread FUD, simply hope to offer a constructive perspective.)

https://t.co/GCGK8t9EXm

[PolkaWorld @polkaworld_org]

Hayek once said: “The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.”

In an open governance system, freedom means that everyone can make proposals, vote, and participate in shaping direction. But this also requires us to remain clear-headed and disciplined in how we allocate public resources—especially when faced with large-scale, high-potential proposals that have yet to define concrete deliverables.

As a Decentralized Voice (DV), PolkaWorld has consistently sought to strike a balance between supporting ecosystem growth and safeguarding public funds. We are not against funding, nor do we dismiss the efforts of projects. However, we believe proposals—especially those requesting significant amounts—should not rely solely on reputation or popularity. Instead, they should be goal-driven, include evaluable milestones, and carry quantifiable accountability.

A truly decentralized, sustainable ecosystem should not be built on “blind spending” but on rational trust, open collaboration, and clear commitments.

@hydration_net is undeniably one of the more active and recognized projects in our ecosystem. As reflected in the proposal’s comments, a large part of the community has shown strong support. From a user adoption perspective, we agree that having a successful breakout project in the @Polkadot ecosystem is vital—it can bring much-needed liquidity and new users.

That said, we must now ask: Should the marketing costs of a high-potential project be borne entirely by the Polkadot Treasury, which is owned collectively by all DOT holders?

The core distinction lies here: when other DeFi projects deploy $100M or $200M in liquidity incentives, they do so with investor capital—not free funding from something like the Ethereum Foundation. Their investors hold tokens and expect returns. In contrast, the Polkadot Treasury, as it stands today, acts as a grant provider, not an investor, and does not receive any tokens in return. As we at PolkaWorld have long pointed out, this mismatch of roles has created recurring friction and governance confusion.

Incentives can indeed unlock integrations, but the team has mentioned that future integrations may require additional Treasury support. So how do we distinguish between integrations that are the project’s own business expenses, and those that serve the broader DOT holder community and thus warrant Treasury funding? This circles back to a fundamental question: Does Hydration belong to its core team and HDX holders, or to all DOT holders? Community members calling for acquiring a stake in Hydration (or at least receiving HDX in exchange) are not entirely unreasonable in this context.🤔

5 million DOT represents nearly 30% of the current DOT balance across the Relay Chain and Asset Hub. If such a large portion of Treasury funds is allocated to a single high-potential project—without clear deliverables or defined success metrics—that effectively shifts the market risk to the Polkadot DAO. If we expect quantifiable milestones from smaller proposals, why should larger ones be exempt? Setting clear goals is not only a commitment to the Treasury, but also a way to motivate the Hydration team, the broader community, and all contributors actively supporting the campaign.

Right now, the Treasury is being asked to act like an investor—selecting a promising project and pinning its hopes on its success—without receiving any of the upside typically expected in return.

What’s more, we’ve yet to see a retention plan: How will we keep the users and liquidity that arrive during the incentive period? As we know, many "airdrop-focused" users have low loyalty. TVL and user numbers may rise quickly, but what happens when the market shifts? What strategies are in place to retain users once the incentives stop? The proposal offers no concrete answers on this front.

To be clear: we are not opposed to supporting ambitious, high-expectation projects with Treasury funding. But should come with clear goals, defined strategies, and explicit commitments.

(PS: We are not here to stir controversy or spread FUD, simply hope to offer a constructive perspective.)

https://t.co/GCGK8t9EXm

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

@Kripto_Ally @crazino87 Waiting for it

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

Finally, @Polkadot is doing what most chains either ignore or overspend on marketing with a brain. Less on egos and middlemen, more on infrastructure, integration, and scalable promotion. If Web3 is a war of narratives, $DOT finally sharpening the spear instead of funding the tent.

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

$25M+ in one month is... aggressive. Treasury’s not a VC fund with infinite dry powder - it’s the bloodstream of the ecosystem. Without prioritization, we risk turning OpenGov into OpenDrain. Time to ask: are we funding impact, or just burning runway?

[PolkaWorld @polkaworld_org]

📊 In April 2025, the @Polkadot Treasury spent over $25M, with a record $20M+ net outflow, according to @dotlake_xyz.

Breakdown:

🔁 Transfers: $20.4M (incl. 5M DOT converted to USDC/USDT)
📄 Proposals: $4.15M
🏅 Bounties: $5.59M
🔥 Burnt: $0.6M
💰 Income: $5.7M (mostly inflation)

With ~$140M left in the treasury—can we sustain this pace?

Is it time to introduce a spending priority framework or even competitive bidding to fund the most impactful ideas?

What do you think?🤔

https://t.co/2jb69ePVdb

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

AI running 20% of a $400M trading volume in game assets is wild, we’re literally watching bots become market participants. DMarket isn’t just gamifying finance, it’s training AI to price culture. The line between gamer, trader, and agent is gone and honestly, that’s the point.

[Mythical Games @MythicalGames]

📈 @DMarket, owned by Mythical, powers one of the biggest game assets trading platforms globally.

With AI agents now driving 20% of its $400M+ annual trading volume, we’re making it even more AI-friendly to lead the next wave of game collectible markets.

@johnwastaken 🎥

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

@gavofyork didn’t just write “Code Is Law” - he basically drafted the constitution, coded the courthouse, and launched a multi-core judicial system called @Polkadot to enforce it. Meanwhile, the rest of crypto still argues in Discord like it’s a townhall in 2009.4o

[The @TheDotsTalks]

Gavin Wood isn’t just a dreamer.

He built Ethereum to bring “Code Is Law” to life, where technology enforces rules, not institutions.

Then he built Polkadot to finish what Ethereum started: a ubiquitous, multi-core supercomputer dissolving the borders between Web3 and Web2.

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

@Kripto_Ally I like the way you think.

[The @TheDotsTalks]

The most hydrated proposal on OpenGov: GIGA HYDRATION CAMPAIGN 🌊

A GIGA hydrated ask to the Polkadot Treasury for 5M DOT to supercharge DeFi on @hydration_net and the ecosystem over 12 months:

- 2M DOT for stablecoin incentives (incl. upcoming native decentralized stablecoin HOLLAR)
- 2M DOT for LP incentives
- 1M DOT to mint GIGADOT

@lolmcshizz broke it down on AAG, highlighting how the previous campaign reshaped Polkadot DeFi landscape and user growth across ecosystem

The playtime is over, now it’s time to go GIGA

https://t.co/VTyY8aZPA9

[Filippo Franchini @filippoweb3]

So now that Vitalik talks about RISC V in blockchain tech everyone is pumped?

Polkadot has been working for at least 2 years on a chain targeting RISC-V via Polkadot Virtual Machine 🤔

https://t.co/6lkJLEpBWS

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

If you yank out the Web3 layer and the game still feels the same, congrats - you just built another Web2 skin with NFTs slapped on. Real Web3 integration - like what @Polkadot enables - should be like oxygen: invisible until it's gone, and suddenly everyone’s gasping.

[Enter the Mythos @EnterTheMythos]

When you rip away the Web3 components from a game, players should notice and demand them back.

That’s the goal.

[Mythical Games @MythicalGames]

Great games that let you keep what you earn and work for. That's our simple formula 🪄

Fun gameplay first, with the added benefit that your game assets, rewards, collections, and achievements actually belong to you.

That’s exactly how gaming should feel 📲

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

@fabsverseNFT Facts!

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

Finally, a game studio that realized players aren’t just dopamine junkies — we’re investors in time, effort, and sometimes even our souls. "Earn it. Keep it." hits different when you’ve spent 400 hours grinding and your sword doesn’t magically disappear with the next patch. Web3 gaming that respects the grind? Yes, please.

[Kaito AI 🌊 @KaitoAI]

.@boopdotfun, led by @dingalingts, utilizing our social algorithm for the BOOP launch!

To reach their community as part of the airdrop, they used Kaito to identify top Solana & memecoin yappers.

With them also giving a tiered token allocation to people with over 500 sKAITO, and all Genesis NFT holders - for those who added a Solana addresses to their connected Yaps account!

Note - the social snapshot given was taken as of 12th April, and prior to $KAITO being on Pendle, so there's no consideration for YT holdings in their drop.

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

While other chains are busy choosing between "fast but fragile" and "secure but sluggish," Polkadot casually rolls up with full security, no trade-offs, and soon — Elastic Scaling to top it off. It's like watching someone solve a Rubik’s cube blindfolded while the rest are still arguing about which side to start with. Meanwhile, Ethereum punts scalability up the stack, Solana speedruns decentralization like it’s a side quest, and TON just skipped the security tutorial altogether.

[Parity Technologies @paritytech]

Sharing some facts about SCALABILITY on @Polkadot here... (and how other ecosystems compare)

🔐Polkadot extends its full security over rollups by verifying all computations on all cores without making any assumptions.

⚡️This means Polkadot rollups scale with zero compromises on security.

↕️ Vertical scalability enabled by the upcoming Elastic Scaling upgrade will raise the messaging throughput that can be achieved between two rollups.

📊Polkadot is by far the most decentralized protocol in Web3 - and this position is in no way threatened by further moves to increase scalability.

In comparison, when it comes to other protocols...

⚠️Solana maximizes its TPS metrics by making compromises on both decentralization and resilience.

⚠️TON is built on a consensus protocol that is NOT secure by design.

⚠️Avalanche makes compromises on both security and decentralization.

⚠️Ethereum's approach is a bet on scalability at the rollup level, which doesn't solve the root problem - instead it passes it one level higher up the stack.

[Danico Studio @Danico_studio]

Everyone’s waiting for “the next big chain.”

Meanwhile, @Polkadot just shipped the most underrated Web3 product of 2025:

Polkadot Hub - a universal gateway for DeFi, NFTs, DAOs, and cross-chain UX.
Not a demo. Not a pitch. It’s live.
Let me show you why this changes the game

Web3’s biggest problem? Fragmentation.
You stake in one app.
Trade in another.
Vote on a DAO somewhere else.
Bridge manually. Pray for security.

Polkadot Hub ends that.
Everything - one place.
Backed by 1000+ validators.
Built into the core protocol.

Here’s what lives inside:
🔄- Native swaps (DOT, USDC, ETH, BTC)
📊- Liquid staking (Bifrost, Lido-style)
🗳️- Onchain governance (OpenGov 2.0)
🎨- NFT minting & trading (multi-chain ready)
💻- Smart contracts (Solidity via PolkaVM, 10x faster than EVM)

For builders:
- Full Solidity support - no rewrites
- $10K Fast Grants in 72h
- $100K+ hackathons
- Modular scaling - Contract - Rollup - Parachain
- Devs stay where they are, scale when they need.

For users:
Subsecond finality

- ~0.01$ gas
- One UX for the full stack of Web3

No more alt-tab chaos between chains.
You log in, you do everything.
Like it should’ve been from day one.

For investors?
DOT now powers liquidity, staking, governance, and gas

- 216+ projects already live

- Polkadot ETF decision in June 👀

- Utility fuels demand. It’s textbook.

So while everyone’s chasing memecoins and $2 gas savings on L2s…
@Polkadot is quietly doing what Ethereum should’ve done years ago:

One protocol.
One UX.
One vision.

No hype. Just working Web3.

#Polkadot #PolkadotHub #DeFi #Web3 #SmartContracts

[The @TheDotsTalks]

Yappers, check your DMs! 🚨

The official Polkadot X account has messaged all eligible yappers for the April campaign!

If it’s your first time on the leaderboard, follow the instructions in the message. You must complete the setup by May 10 to qualify

Congrats to everyone! 🎉